Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
P_7878

Hawker Siddeley Trident - The Pioneer Trijet

Recommended Posts

It was the first T-tail rear-engined 3-engine jetliner (first flight ahead of the legendary B727!). On record, it was also the first airliner to make a blind-landing in revenue service. It was among the first to be certified for CAT III operations, and was an extremely sophisticated aircraft for its time. The first auto-landing in a Trident was achieved in March 1964. The first on a commercial flight with passengers aboard was achieved in June 1965, with a Trident 1, from Paris to Heathrow.

In our virtual world, in FSX, one thing I enjoyed was flying such aircraft (many actually originating from FS9, but made flyable by community enthusiasts). Unfortunately, as we move forward, these simulations would completely disappear from the virtual skies (if not already). Of course, certain developers/publishers (such as Just Flight) are making an effort to bring back at least a few of these historic aircraft (e.g. BAC 1-11), but the commercial aspects vs production expenses negate (PW) reproduction of what we could freely get in the FSX world.

One such classic was David Maltby's HS-121 Trident-2. As I am looking into my (FW) FSX aircraft collection, this caught my attention primarily due to the authenticity of its VC. And, if we thought B727 was loud, a warning about the Trident's sound appears on David's Website as follows:

"WARNING - THESE AIRCRAFT SOUNDS ARE VERY LOUD:
David Maltby accepts no liability for damage to hearing, hi-fi equipment & speakers, property, ornamental fish (cold water or tropical), telescopes, trombones, facial hair or anything else either."

Here is this Trijet on a short (dawn) flight (on icy Iceland) from BIAR (Akureyri) to BIRK (Reykjavik). I've used the Lufthansa livery for this flight and found an occasion to demonstrate for myself the Orbx's Iceland FTX Global Demo - I don't have the full FTX Global). I've also attached one unit of CIVA INS for navigation. Thanks for viewing the images of this milestone aircraft (even if it's probably a rehash for some).

29526330867_dbf6b1d6ad_h.jpg

44414560742_2387d1a12f_h.jpg

29526329867_10e59ba7e2_h.jpg

29526329267_d3e38d2b27_h.jpg

29526328767_b41b434dc4_h.jpg

44414559202_31a2042578_h.jpg

29526327827_2c5036f301_h.jpg

29526327477_3ccb6bc021_h.jpg

44414558532_ed4c57a762_h.jpg

44414558402_cc6f923c11_h.jpg

29526326577_ba4570d216_h.jpg

29526326097_d7fd7baf75_h.jpg

44414557762_f96b6c0341_h.jpg

44414557622_ec056c707e_h.jpg

44414557252_dec1bf9b40_h.jpg

44414556832_baabee892e_h.jpg

29526324137_c7f08cc58f_h.jpg

Edited by P_7878
  • Like 4
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some nice shots of an interesting aircraft. Like you, I enjoyed using Davids fine product in FS9 and FSX.

As you say, the Trident was very advanced for its time. Its thin wing was designed for high cruising speed. I think it was the fastest passenger aircraft in regular service in those days. The problem was that the wing did not generate much lift at lower speeds. And in the sixties most runways were a lot shorter than they are now.

I was flying from RAF Luqa, Malta, when BEA introduced a Trident service from the UK. The longer runway at that time was 06/24 which was barely 2000 metres. Our Canberra PR9s required consideraby less than that, but watching the Tridents was interesting. More accurately, in the summer, it was horrifying. They were very noisy, like David Maltby's version, but they had very poor acceleration. The crash barrier at the end of the runway had to be lowered, and the Tridents wheels seemed to be barely off the ground with a hundred metres to go. I doubt if the Trident could have met current certification standards, unless it flew empty.

For take off and climbout, the trident relied heavily on its leading edge slats, which were a relatively new idea at the time. And in June 1972 a BEA trident crashed after take off from Heathrow, when the slats appeared to have been retracted much too soon. As a result, operating procedures were changed and various warnings were built in, to reduce the risk. Like so many procedures we take for granted now, which are the result of past accidents.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

John B

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love that Old School Cockpit

  • Like 1

100%75%50%d8a34be0e82d98b5a45ff4336cd0dddc

0D8701AB-1210-4FF8-BD6C-309792740F81.gif

Patrick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciated the notes and comments!

Yes, the key takeaway is:"So many procedures we take for granted now, are the result of past accidents". So, although this aircraft was not commercially successful, it surely contributed novel ideas for subsequent evolution of technology.

And, about "Old School Cockpit", it does have a certain appeal (especially in the SIM, for us "arm-chair" pilots who have the magical autopilot button "Pause"...🙂...), but seriously, such cockpit layouts keep us honest about where the roots are. So, I share the same thoughts.

Thanks all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...