Traffic Global or Ultimate Traffic Live?

[Drumcode 1,892]

Luis, which shader program are you using? 

[UAL4life 237]

2 hours ago, IanHarrison said:

When I enquired from Flight 1, I was told that UTL is no longer supported and would not be developed further. TG was the only AI which would have any progress.

Ian Harrison

Even if they didn’t say this. One can make the claim based on their actions alone that UTL is DOA. 

@dal330200

wow that’s a great idea using both PSX and UTL. I’m gonna try it thanks!!

Edited October 31, 2018 by UAL4life
Added shtuff

[331BK 96]

i also have both, but currently use UTL.

Only issiue i have is not much traffic in the air 😞

 

[signmanbob 592]

8 hours ago, GSalden said:

Here I have combined the TG aircraft with the FSPXAI payware aircraft and use them with PSXseeconTraffic.

I wish you could point me to a video that shows how to do this.

 

Bob

[GSalden 4,655]

4 hours ago, signmanbob said:

I wish you could point me to a video that shows how to do this.

 

Bob

Read the AILGenerator manual which explains how to add aircraft .

[fluffyflops 1,845]

Let's us not forget the base schedules for ut live are 2 and a half years old as this morning we enter into iata winter 2018 to 2019.

For the THIRD TIME Tom and flight1 have let updates on their product slip away and theres no power pack to easily amend and change things.

From day one UT live has been a perfect example of how this new pay to beta obsession has left us with a half finished pile of junk which In reality  was a rehashed ut2 with a fancy snazzy time, some imported oag and sabre data with incorrect iata airline codes from 5 years ago hastily sold to the community as a 'brand new product'. It wasnt and we got duped again, as said before for the third time. 

 

Edited November 1, 2018 by tooting

[Dave_YVR 968]

 The schedules for UTL are based on Summer of 2017 which to my math is only a year and half old, which also keep in mind that the program has been out just as long. Either way, UTL in its current unfinished form is still miles ahead of what TG will offer. 

 Personally, I don't use either even though I have own and have tested both of them. A descent custom setup is just that much better, the OP asked for opinions and I just call it as I see it.

Edited November 1, 2018 by Dave_YVR

[fluffyflops 1,845]

I thought they where winter 2016-2017 if I remember rightly

[TimF 3]

Thanks for all your contributions folks, some really useful info here. Think I'm going to shelve TG for now and take a spin with UTL. I mostly fly SE Asia, a region where TG = mostly empty skies/airports at present. When (if) TG is finally ready I may return to it.

[Dave_YVR 968]

5 hours ago, TimF said:

Thanks for all your contributions folks, some really useful info here. Think I'm going to shelve TG for now and take a spin with UTL. I mostly fly SE Asia, a region where TG = mostly empty skies/airports at present. When (if) TG is finally ready I may return to it.

  UTL will have included schedules for the area but might not have all of the liveries, so you may find that you will need to add and assign some paints for that region. It all depends on what parts of SE Asia you spend your time.

 

7 hours ago, tooting said:

I thought they where winter 2016-2017 if I remember rightly

 Even if it was from that time period, it's still far better than the 2 legs a day 24 hr mess included in the other project.

[Drumcode 1,892]

I think I am finally going to try PSXseeconTraffic, just to see how it works. How long does it usually take to get it all configured when I have UTL and all other models ready in the folders already? Can you actually control the model/paint assignment through the interface? What happens to the plane in the live schedule which I don't have the model/paint for? 

[kiek 1,212]

7 minutes ago, Drumcode said:

How long does it usually take to get it all configured when I have UTL and all other models ready in the folders already? 

Can you actually control the model/paint assignment through the interface?

What happens to the plane in the live schedule which I don't have the model/paint for? 

Install and run AILGenerator pointing to your folders with AI aircraft.Takes no more then 5 minutes.

Run PSXseeconTraffic and change the AI liveries folder parameter to point to your AILGenerator folder.

The rest goes automatic. If you do not have the livery for an airline+type it will try similar types for that airline. If not found it will try a generic (fabric) livery of the wanted type, if not available it will try another airline with the type and so on. All this can be found in the Manual.

Nico Kaan

[Mace 1,902]

7 minutes ago, kiek said:

Install and run AILGenerator pointing to your folders with AI aircraft.Takes no more then 5 minutes.

Run PSXseeconTraffic and change the AI liveries folder parameter to point to your AILGenerator folder.

The rest goes automatic. If you do not have the livery for an airline+type it will try similar types for that airline. If not found it will try a generic (fabric) livery of the wanted type, if not available it will try another airline with the type and so on. All this can be found in the Manual.

Nico Kaan

Since we're talking about it -- can I use PSXseeconTraffic to *supplement* my UTL setup?  Or must I disable UTL to have PSXseecontraffic going?  

[Drumcode 1,892]

1 hour ago, kiek said:

Install and run AILGenerator pointing to your folders with AI aircraft.Takes no more then 5 minutes.

Run PSXseeconTraffic and change the AI liveries folder parameter to point to your AILGenerator folder.

The rest goes automatic. If you do not have the livery for an airline+type it will try similar types for that airline. If not found it will try a generic (fabric) livery of the wanted type, if not available it will try another airline with the type and so on. All this can be found in the Manual.

Nico Kaan

Just read in the manual that programs like Radar Contact will not recognize this traffic, correct? 

[ZKOKQ 984]

18 minutes ago, Drumcode said:

Just read in the manual that programs like Radar Contact will not recognize this traffic, correct? 

Correct. I use LiveATC, works great. Eventhough there is no interaction, it is still immersive. I followed an Emirates A380 into YSSY once, and because of foul weather, there were many planes in holding pattern. So I was able to follow his hold and follow him in when cleared.