Searching the bottleneck

[Chandler 13]

Hi all,

I was wondering, if any of you guys have a clou, what the problem could be. As you see, I got modest FPS on my system, but no CPU core nor the GPU are nearly at its full capacity. Could there be another issue I'm not seeing? At least one should be at its limit, or is this a normal picture? I honestly have expected more than this. Thanks for any advise...

Edited November 11, 2018 by Chandler

[Chandler 13]

So I figured out, it was probably related to the FS Labs Airbus, tried it again with the PMDG 747 and now the load is at 100% at core 0 and the frames are doubled. Maybe there was something wrong with it.

Edited November 11, 2018 by Chandler

[fghdgdfdfgfgf 111]

hmmm  ....maybe the memory is the bottleneck with the FS Lab graphic. 

I know Westman is an FS Lab user with a big mem overclock ...Westman, you out there? can we get a fs lab 3200 vs 4000+ test.  🙂

[fghdgdfdfgfgf 111]

BTW  ...nice over clock  ....or so it seams.

Can we see a full graphic on the PMDG 747?

[Chandler 13]

2 hours ago, FunknNasty said:

BTW  ...nice over clock  ....or so it seams.

Can we see a full graphic on the PMDG 747?

Sure her you go, 747 @ LHR

[Chandler 13]

2 hours ago, FunknNasty said:

hmmm  ....maybe the memory is the bottleneck with the FS Lab graphic. 

I know Westman is an FS Lab user with a big mem overclock ...Westman, you out there? can we get a fs lab 3200 vs 4000+ test.  🙂

Yeah the Corsair is not very good, but it was build in, so I'll change that in the near furture...

Edited November 11, 2018 by Chandler

[ComSimPilot 623]

Wow, the difference in FPS is huge. I'm impressed with an 9900K and still the FSL eats so many frames. What it needs really to run smoothly at Heathrow? I have an 7700K and have similar experience.

[fghdgdfdfgfgf 111]

21 minutes ago, Chandler said:

Yeah the Corsair is not very good, but it was build in, so I'll change that in the near furture...

Yeah, that is a nice overclock (it seems*). The core usage is also encouraging.  Cheers!

I hope Westman chimes in with regard to the FS Lab memory question.

[Chandler 13]

13 minutes ago, Daedalus said:

Wow, the difference in FPS is huge. I'm impressed with an 9900K and still the FSL eats so many frames. What it needs really to run smoothly at Heathrow? I have an 7700K and have similar experience.

Yes the FSLabs is weird, it doesnt use core 0 as much, in the same scenario I got around 40 FPS with the FSL 319.

[Chandler 13]

3 minutes ago, FunknNasty said:

Yeah, that is a nice overclock (it seems*). The core usage is also encouraging.  Cheers!

I hope Westman chimes in with regard to the FS Lab memory question.

5.3 was only for a test, its not stable, 5.2 is max durable so far.

[fghdgdfdfgfgf 111]

4 minutes ago, Chandler said:

5.3 was only for a test, its not stable, 5.2 is max durable so far.

I'd take the 5.2 and call it a day! A good day!  🙂

[Ray Proudfoot 8,954]

My professionally built computer from Chillblast in England with a 8086K was overclocked to 5.0. Maybe they could have got it a little higher but stability is everything. Would 0.2 give me a noticeable difference? I doubt it.

[Luke 782]

What's the GPU usage at?

Cheers!
 

[fghdgdfdfgfgf 111]

2 hours ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

My professionally built computer from Chillblast in England with a 8086K was overclocked to 5.0. Maybe they could have got it a little higher but stability is everything. Would 0.2 give me a noticeable difference? I doubt it.

Down to the last nano second

-Nasty Built of Silicon Valley 

:-)

[Chandler 13]

8 hours ago, Luke said:

What's the GPU usage at?

Cheers!
 

Its around 50%.