Feelthere Developing New Ejets for P3D 4.4

[ugom13 0]

Apparently, the flaps are incorrectly modelled (it's like a mixture of 175/190 for all aircrafts). Can somebody confirm ?

E190

E175

FEELTHERE FAMILY

 

edit: after having double checked, the E190 seems ok. Only the E170/175 has a missing flap.

[JasonPC 173]

24 minutes ago, ckyliu said:

Well this was going to be a day one purchase for me. But based on feedback here and the expensive pricing, I am going to sit tight until more positive feedback arrives, it's patched, or it goes on sale. It seems it was rushed to be released before Christmas and shortcuts were taken.

$100 for the four variants compared to Aerosoft A320 family bundle at €80 which has more variations and engines in it, makes the new E-jets look overpriced. Similarly the Aerosoft CRJ700/900 bundle is €75 and seems to be higher quality.

Honestly don't buy the CRJ either I had to uninstall it. Posts being closed or deleted about a kernelbase.dll error that renders the plane unusable. I uninstalled it and have written it off as junkware.

[Adrian123 1,015]

IMO. The old version with some updated lighting and PBR.

[Arklight1 140]

1 hour ago, ugom13 said:

Apparently, the flaps are incorrectly modelled (it's like a mixture of 175/190 for all aircrafts). Can somebody confirm ?

E190

E175

FEELTHERE FAMILY

 

edit: after having double checked, the E190 seems ok. Only the E170/175 has a missing flap.

 

Be sure to report that on their forum if you haven't already. Vic said they are working on a SP.

[slait 169]

4 hours ago, Arklight1 said:

If you add both packs to your cart, a $20 instant credit is applied. 

We'll, that helps, but at $100 that's still in the NGXu range which still makes it a bit much for me.

[Shomron 251]

4 hours ago, ugom13 said:

Apparently, the flaps are incorrectly modelled (it's like a mixture of 175/190 for all aircrafts). Can somebody confirm ?

E190

E175

FEELTHERE FAMILY

 

edit: after having double checked, the E190 seems ok. Only the E170/175 has a missing flap.

What is the issue again? Are you saying the E175 wing is modelled identically to the E195? Can you attach a picture of the E175 wing?

[Arklight1 140]

Hi all, its important to post these issues on the Feelthere forum. I've seen a bunch of things mentioned here at Avsim but not posted there (including the information from the 195 pilot here), unless I've somehow missed it. Vic is very active in that forum, so if you want visibility regarding an issue it's very important to post there. He's a good dude 🙂

[ugom13 0]

3 hours ago, Shomron said:

What is the issue again? Are you saying the E175 wing is modelled identically to the E195? Can you attach a picture of the E175 wing?

I didn’t buy it for now (that’s why I asked for confirmation from people who bought it) but just from the pictures, it seems they missed the outer second flap on E175/170. 

[francy25 130]

1 hour ago, Arklight1 said:

Hi all, its important to post these issues on the Feelthere forum. I've seen a bunch of things mentioned here at Avsim but not posted there (including the information from the 195 pilot here), unless I've somehow missed it. Vic is very active in that forum, so if you want visibility regarding an issue it's very important to post there. He's a good dude 🙂

I am going to do a post on their forum with all the info.

Right now I am collecting all the missing things/bugs that I found.

[Shomron 251]

I've asked them to consolidate a thread with the issues and what's planned to be fixed as there were many issues reported.

Like Aerosoft did for the A330 after launch.

I will buy it only when I get visibility on what planned to be fixed and what's not...

[francy25 130]

1 hour ago, Shomron said:

I've asked them to consolidate a thread with the issues and what's planned to be fixed as there were many issues reported.

Like Aerosoft did for the A330 after launch.

I will buy it only when I get visibility on what planned to be fixed and what's not...

I have made a post in their forums with some initial elements to be fixed.

Problem is that my post is stil waiting for admin approval.

[JasonPC 173]

At least they are working on some fixes. It looks like they have some of the lighting issues fixed but some will likely remain. That’s the one thing that’s scary about this developer is that they recognize issues but eventually (or sometimes initially) state that they have no plans to fix them. But when charging full price like this, they had better support their product.

[ComSimPilot 623]

I was about to purchase this on day one, but after these issues I'll wait. It is good that I see the developers active in their forums but I think I'll wait to see how fast they will address the issues before I buy. I have no problem if there are bugs as long as the developer is committed to fix them all and even add more features.

[Wise87 1,275]

I bought the plane and there are too many items that just don't work, need fixed or they left out. You can't even import flightplans because they didn't bother to add a folder to import the FP from. You can't use the panel back lights in the daytime which would help in reading the panel. Don't try a dawn to dusk flight because you have to wait for the lights to come on.  The autopilot panel is hard to read and the baro standard and heading sync button doesn't even work. You can't even use the FMC for fuel, doors or panel states in 2019. This plane is defiantly not worth the $60 as it is currently. Lets hope the developer fixes many of the issues. 😞

[HighTowers 1,434]

Just watched Chewys stream on the first flight.  All in all he seems quite pleased with it and enjoyed the flight. The items mentioned above are indeed there but rather minor. By no means a deal breaker and FT is aware and will be fixing them.  Biggest thing to fix would be to have better lighting in the VC during the day. Anyhow, says its way better than the SSG Embraers.  Recommend watching the stream from the perspective of a general simmer.  

Kinda odd everyone focuses on the negative points but rarely mention the positives. The external modelling looks fantastic.  For most simmers, it looks to be fairly complete with a nearly fully featured FMC. For the real world pilots out there, theres obviously going to be things not right. How can you compare vs a 50$ sim.  The systems look to be fairly detailed too watching that flight.  Think its pretty good for having an ERJ in the sim albeit a little expensive to have both variant packages.