Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
JerryC

Intolerable framerate under I7-8700k and RTX2080

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, newtie said:

Those animals have a mind of their own,,,😆

Yep, they give me the "Hump"

  • Like 1

System: MSFS2020-Premium Deluxe, ASUS Maximus XI Hero,  Intel i7-8086K o/c to 5.0GHz, Corsair AIO H115i Pro, Lian Li PC-O11D XL,MSI RTX 3080 SUPRIM 12Gb, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 SSD, 1Tb Samsung 860 EVO SSD, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR4 3200Mhz RAM, Corsair R1000X Gold PSU,Win 11 ,LG 43UD79 43" 4K IPS Panel., Airbus TCA Full Kit, Stream Deck XL.

 

Share this post


Link to post
19 hours ago, 0Artur0 said:

Even the computer that runs our simulation of the universe would have issues running P3D in some situations 😉

 

LOL...  A computer does not run our Universe, a "Mentat" does...  With the spice Melange the Mentat lives eternally and has no issues with anything (if you've read the Dune series, you'll know what I am getting at <wink>)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

The Sim is called : Prepar3d , so not only be prepared for a smooth ride ( read: flight ), but also for blurries and stutt.t.t.t.t.ers 🤓

Edited by GSalden

13900 8 cores @ 5.5-5.8 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.3 GHz (hyperthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D4 - GSkill Ripjaws 2x 16 Gb 4266 mhz @ 3200 mhz / cas 13 -  Inno3D RTX4090 X3 iCHILL 24 Gb - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 1Tb - Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Thermaltake Level 10 GT case - EKWB Extreme 240 liquid cooling set push/pull - 2x 55’ Sony 4K tv's as front view and right view.

13600  6 cores @ 5.1 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz (hypterthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D - GSkill Trident 4x Gb 3200 MHz cas 15 - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16 Gb  - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 2x  Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Corsair D4000 Airflow case - NXT Krajen Z63 AIO liquide cooling - 1x 65” Sony 4K tv as left view.

FOV : 190 degrees

My flightsim vids :  https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0

 

Share this post


Link to post
On 6/24/2019 at 7:07 PM, w6kd said:

Each generation of new CPUs has produced improvements in single-core performance, through the combined effects of increasing the clock rate, and also by improving the instruction pipelining to increase the average instructions-per-clock cycle (IPC). 

 

Not true for the last generations 🙂

A 4770k has almost the same single core performance as a top 2019 CPU.

Share this post


Link to post
27 minutes ago, swiesma said:

Not true for the last generations 🙂

A 4770k has almost the same single core performance as a top 2019 CPU.

Well, to be honest, this is only true if you assume that all 4770K users have their CPU overclocked to 4.3-4.5GHz on all cores. When comparing stock clocks, the 9900K (as "top 2019 CPU") comes with a whopping 5.0GHz single core turbo (compared to the 3.9GHz single core turbo) and together with the completely newer backbone (chipset, DDR4 RAM), a 9900K will outperform a 4770K in almost any current single core benchmark by a margin that is not only explainable with the different clock rates.

As a user that switched from a 3770K running at 4.5GHz with 2133MHz DDR3 RAM to a 8700K running at 5.0GHz with 3200MHz DDR4 RAM (both builds using the same 1080Ti), all I can say that the difference in P3D was huge. And certainly bigger than the 11% clock difference would explain.

  • Upvote 1

Greetings, Chris

Intel i5-13600K, 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 RAM, MSI RTX 4080 Gaming X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS

Share this post


Link to post

Passmark Single-Thread-Performances:

9900K - Result: 2899 (Rank: 2 behind 9900KF)
4770K - Result: 2250 (Rank: 109)

Just saying.


System: i9 9900k@4.9 - 32 GB RAM - Aorus 1080ti --- Sim/Addons: P3D v5 + ProSim737
Signature3.png

Share this post


Link to post
26 minutes ago, swiesma said:

Not true for the last generations 🙂

A 4770k has almost the same single core performance as a top 2019 CPU.

Nice try, but no.  The Devil's Canyon CPUs won't run reliably at 5+ GHz like the Coffee Lake chips.  Best I could do with the 4790K was 4.7 HT off without crazy voltages.  Silicon Lottery reported that 100% of the 8086K chips they tested did 5 GHz, and well over half could run at 5.2 GHz.  Multiply that by a 10-15% IPC gain, and it's not at all "almost the same."

 


Bob Scott | President and CEO, AVSIM Inc
ATP Gulfstream II-III-IV-V

System1 (P3Dv5/v4): i9-13900KS @ 6.0GHz, water 2x360mm, ASUS Z790 Hero, 32GB GSkill 7800MHz CAS36, ASUS RTX4090
Samsung 55" JS8500 4K TV@30Hz,
3x 2TB WD SN850X 1x 4TB Crucial P3 M.2 NVME SSD, EVGA 1600T2 PSU, 1.2Gbps internet
Fiber link to Yamaha RX-V467 Home Theater Receiver, Polk/Klipsch 6" bookshelf speakers, Polk 12" subwoofer, 12.9" iPad Pro
PFC yoke/throttle quad/pedals with custom Hall sensor retrofit, Thermaltake View 71 case, Stream Deck XL button box

Sys2 (MSFS/XPlane): i9-10900K @ 5.1GHz, 32GB 3600/15, nVidia RTX4090FE, Alienware AW3821DW 38" 21:9 GSync, EVGA 1000P2
Thrustmaster TCA Boeing Yoke, TCA Airbus Sidestick, 2x TCA Airbus Throttle quads, PFC Cirrus Pedals, Coolermaster HAF932 case

Portable Sys3 (P3Dv4/FSX/DCS): i9-9900K @ 5.0 Ghz, Noctua NH-D15, 32GB 3200/16, EVGA RTX3090, Dell S2417DG 24" GSync
Corsair RM850x PSU, TM TCA Officer Pack, Saitek combat pedals, TM Warthog HOTAS, Coolermaster HAF XB case

Share this post


Link to post
11 minutes ago, JoeFackel said:

Passmark Single-Thread-Performances:

9900K - Result: 2899 (Rank: 2 behind 9900KF)
4770K - Result: 2250 (Rank: 109)

Just saying.

9900K running at 5.0GHz, the 4770K was running at 3.9GHz. 29% clock difference, 29% difference in Passmark points.

Just saying ;-)


Greetings, Chris

Intel i5-13600K, 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 RAM, MSI RTX 4080 Gaming X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS

Share this post


Link to post

Just saying!!! have my old 4790K at 4.8ghz with corsair 2666 c10 binned mems as base system ( testing P3D as base system ) run tested with this GPU.s  1060, 1070, 1080TI, 2080 , 2080TI.

have compared it with the never chips with same gpu , compared to a  +5ghz 9900k its a snail ,,, Just saying

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post

That is what I wrote above: the closer the clock rates, the lesser the difference. Yet you get DDR4 with the newer platform and we should be aware that not everybody is overclocking their CPUs that much...


Greetings, Chris

Intel i5-13600K, 2x16GB 3200MHz CL14 RAM, MSI RTX 4080 Gaming X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS

Share this post


Link to post

4790K with fast mems 4.4ghz comared to a 9900K with 3600mhz c16 mems XMP ( no 4266 c16 ) the single tread difference was 18% difference with same clockspeed 9.5%  in my tests.

it can be small differences to what other get , i know some tests is done with ddr4 2133 and 1600mhz DDR3 , i used 2666 c10 XMP DDR3 and 3600mhz C16 DDR4 for ddr3 you cant go much higher than that DDR4 i can run 4266mhz c16 as i do in my sim PC. The diff to a allout 4790k 5ghz fast mems compared to a allout 9900K is approx 25% .

You have a span for non OC 9900k with slow mems compared to a allout 4790k diff the new one is only 5% faster on othe hand a allout 9900k compared to non OC 4790k with value select mems is over 50%

It all depends how you have set up your system old or new , 

Edited by westman

Share this post


Link to post
On 6/24/2019 at 5:01 PM, w6kd said:

An overloaded camel trying to get in to London Heathrow.  I can't top that.

 

Is that what WWII era pilots mean when they talk about "flying the hump"?

  • Upvote 1

Intel 10700K @ 5.1Ghz, Asus Hero Maximus motherboard, Noctua NH-U12A cooler, Corsair Vengeance Pro 32GB 3200 MHz RAM, RTX 2060 Super GPU, Cooler Master HAF 932 Tower, Thermaltake 1000W Toughpower PSU, Windows 10 Professional 64-Bit, 100TB of disk storage. Klaatu barada nickto.

Share this post


Link to post

Premature benchmark leaks of the 10th gen Intel chips have shown a significant increase in IPC and single core performance.

I think this would have a noticeable effect on P3D  

Might be finally time to upgrade my 6700k 😎

Share this post


Link to post

Premarure screenshot leaks indicated that FSX would look like heaven on Earth, but that one didn't work out too well. We must be cautious.

Edited by Christopher Low

Christopher Low

UK2000 Beta Tester

FSBetaTesters3.png

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...