imaginesim next project guess thread

[micstatic 4,313]

thanks.  Will give it a try.  

[DaveS 144]

2 hours ago, SAX702 said:

 

Washington–Reagan TS     New York–LaGuardia DD

 

Just to update, DCA also has DD and LGA has been done by IS 

[Bob Scott 7,715]

Tropicalsim's KDCA was never updated for P3D beyond v1.2, so really Drzewiecki Design's version (part of their Washington airports package) is the only native version for P3D v3/v4 users.

[DaveCT2003 1,820]

5 hours ago, DaveS said:

Just to update, DCA also has DD and LGA has been done by IS 

DD also did KLGA, but ImagineSim's KLGA not only looks great, they developed KLGA to match the post construction drawings (I'm not sure if constriction has finished or not, but if not then it has to be getting close). I don't remember what the IS KLGA performance was like though, which is very important given the proximity to KJFK and KEWR (Newark). If I get a chance this weekend I'll try to test and report here.

DD's KDCA (Washington X) and the surrounding Washington's DC area  was nicely done and I don't recall experiencing or even hearing about any performance issues with the scenery so I would be surprised to see it redone.

I hope this is helpful!

[micstatic 4,313]

I find the performance at LGA to be pretty good especially considering the area involved.  Imaginesim version i mean

[DaveCT2003 1,820]

5 minutes ago, micstatic said:

I find the performance at LGA to be pretty good especially considering the area involved.  Imaginesim version i mean

Excellent, many thanks!

[duckbilled 310]

While I am running the SSJ DTW beta in P3D, I don't think a lot of people got access to it. I know I never gained access to the beta forums (got the email, but nothing else), so I don't know if development of that has halted again or if it is still going. I think DTW would be a good candidate considering there are really no modern options for the airport unless you got your hands on the SSJ Beta.No, I am not including Blueprint.

[DaveCT2003 1,820]

2 hours ago, duckbilled said:

While I am running the SSJ DTW beta in P3D, I don't think a lot of people got access to it. I know I never gained access to the beta forums (got the email, but nothing else), so I don't know if development of that has halted again or if it is still going. I think DTW would be a good candidate considering there are really no modern options for the airport unless you got your hands on the SSJ Beta.No, I am not including Blueprint.

Hey brother. I've been a member of the SSJ Beta team dince 2009. Since its always been freeware, (something new is KDTW being donationware, which I'm very happy to see). As such, the guys have a different priority for completing the project hut they always come through for us. The wuality if their work is such that I'd be surprised to see a payware developer fo the same airport,  but you never know!

 

[sfgiants13 83]

14 hours ago, DaveCT2003 said:

Hey brother. I've been a member of the SSJ Beta team dince 2009. Since its always been freeware, (something new is KDTW being donationware, which I'm very happy to see). As such, the guys have a different priority for completing the project hut they always come through for us. The wuality if their work is such that I'd be surprised to see a payware developer fo the same airport,  but you never know!

 

 

I can't remember where I saw it (it may have been the LVFR forums) but there was talk of a payware developer taking over.  Nothing ever came of it but the idea was out there.

Edited October 18, 2019 by sfgiants13

[Benjamin J 751]

18 hours ago, DaveCT2003 said:

DD also did KLGA, but ImagineSim's KLGA not only looks great, they developed KLGA to match the post construction drawings (I'm not sure if constriction has finished or not, but if not then it has to be getting close). I don't remember what the IS KLGA performance was like though, which is very important given the proximity to KJFK and KEWR (Newark). If I get a chance this weekend I'll try to test and report here.

This is NYC, don't overestimate their capacity to build 😛

Construction is well underway but is not even close to being finished. However, they are doing a tiered construction scheme, and so I believe concourse B was already opened and is currently in use. Most of the rest of the terminal is still awaiting construction however. And let's not even begin talking about the proposed airtrain connection to the subway... I believe they havent decided yet where it should even connect, and if so, how. It'll be a little while longer, I think 😉 

[Kevin_28 164]

2 hours ago, sfgiants13 said:

 

I can't remember where I saw it (it may have been the LVFR forums) but there was talk of a payware developer taking over.  Nothing ever came of it but the idea was out there.

I know someone brought up the possibility of LatinVFR taking on KDTW when it was still in pre-beta stage due to Ian's absence. Ricardo stated that if he were to take on the project, he would build it from scratch and not use SSJ's code. As it is DTW is in beta, and since it's being actively (?) developed, it's unlikely LatinVFR will take that on. They're usually pretty big on not taking on scenery when other devs are doing it.

[Richard Muñoz 0]

On 10/17/2019 at 7:51 AM, DaveCT2003 said:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<SimBase.Document Type="AddOnXml" version="4,0" id="add-on">
  <AddOn.Name>KPHL Scenery SunSkyJet v1.0a P3Dv4</AddOn.Name>
  <AddOn.Description>SunSkyJet Philadelphia Intl Airport</AddOn.Description>
  <AddOn.Component>
    <Category>Autogen Texture</Category>
    <Path>C:\Users\Dave 4770K\Documents\KPHL SunSkyJet V1.0a P3Dv4\Texture</Path>
  </AddOn.Component>
  <AddOn.Component>
    <Category>Texture</Category>
    <Path>C:\Users\Dave 4770K\Documents\KPHL SunSkyJet V1.0a P3Dv4\KPHL_SunSkyJet\texture</Path>
  </AddOn.Component>
  <AddOn.Component>
    <Category>Effects</Category>
    <Path>C:\Users\Dave 4770K\Documents\KPHL SunSkyJet V1.0a P3Dv4\Effects</Path>
    <Layer>155</Layer>
  </AddOn.Component>
  <AddOn.Component>
    <Category>Scenery</Category>
    <Path>C:\Users\Dave 4770K\Documents\KPHL SunSkyJet V1.0a P3Dv4\KPHL_SunSkyJet</Path>
    <Name>KPHL SunSkyJet v1.0a P3Dv4</Name>
    <Layer>145</Layer>
  </AddOn.Component>
</SimBase.Document>

 

Yes, great scenery. I noticed that in FSX, the ILS 27L was off. I mentioned it on their forum. Wasn't sure if anybody was having the same issue. https://www.sunskyjet.com/newforum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=91

Question regarding the addon.xml for P3Dv4.5. Do I need to include the LAYER as well??

[Richard Muñoz 0]

disregard this one. Submitted the thread twice by mistake.

Edited October 22, 2020 by Richard Muñoz
dulpicate

[787flyer 633]

BTW: Imagineism did announce that DFW will be their next big one.

[simsuper80 12]

they really should update shanghai. so many devs out there abandon there outdated airports to work on other projects. they could really learn from flightbeam for example.