Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Keyholebud

What would you like the "Testers" to Test?

Recommended Posts

I feel this would be a good topic for those who will be testing the Tech Alpha 1 or 2. What would you like to see tested in the new simulator to see if they are working well?

I would like to see them test:

Systems, Navigation, GPS, ILS, VNAV, LNAV, VOR, and how well they work.

Weather and winds, crosswinds, tail winds, pressure, temp, icing, and the effect on the flight dynamics.


32' Samsung Odyssey G7 Curved Monitor 240 Hz AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming K7 | Intel i7-7700K 4.2 MSI AMD RX Vega 56 8 GB HMB2 500 GB WD Black NVMe PCIe SSD M.2 X4 1 TB WD Black SSD 64 GB PC3200 DDR4 Saitek X52 Pro MSFS 1-9 FSX, FSX-SE, FSW , X-Plane 9, 10, 11, DCS everything, Falcon 4 BMS IL-2 yadda yadda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seeing as it is "whatever goes" type of alpha, I guess they are more into general feedback. You know, what do you think feels wrong, what should we add - that kind of feedback. They can't expect too much from bunch of unvetted testers, to a degree where someone's flight experience might have peaked with Battlefield titles. 

Not saying that this feedback in not valued, but most likely have their own tech team who will do validation of any component requirements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Evros said:

Seeing as it is "whatever goes" type of alpha, I guess they are more into general feedback.

Kind of speculation on your part. With the interviews from the Dev's that is not the case. Plus the Tech Alpha application process was a list of questions, a Speed test and a Dxdiag upload. Vetted. But we got It, you don't care. Anyone else?


32' Samsung Odyssey G7 Curved Monitor 240 Hz AORUS GA-Z270X-Gaming K7 | Intel i7-7700K 4.2 MSI AMD RX Vega 56 8 GB HMB2 500 GB WD Black NVMe PCIe SSD M.2 X4 1 TB WD Black SSD 64 GB PC3200 DDR4 Saitek X52 Pro MSFS 1-9 FSX, FSX-SE, FSW , X-Plane 9, 10, 11, DCS everything, Falcon 4 BMS IL-2 yadda yadda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From the FS Elite developers interview: "We will listen to everything." (11:33).  Part of a discussion of the tech alpha starting at 10:00 that suggests it's very much a "'whatever goes' kind of alpha."

Also - testers will test what Microsoft and Asobo want them to test, not what users want them to test.

Sorry to disappoint.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 7


Alan Ampolsk

"Ah, Paula, they are firing at me!"
-- Saint-Exupery

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Typically with an alpha test build there is software included that is recording telemetry data and sending it to base periodically. Coincidence with the FSX beta, I think not. So just running the software on a wide range of hardware configurations and letting them collect the crash dumps will be helpful. Next I expect they’ll be interested in user impressions on the software’s ergonomics and reports of anything that doesn’t look right. The best service to the user community the testers can do is to do as much as Asobo wants so development can be as efficient as possible. Slow is quick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alan_A said:

Also - testers will test what Microsoft and Asobo want them to test, not what users want them to test.

Exactly!

  • Upvote 1

Cheers, Søren Dissing

CPU: Intel i9-10900KF @5.2Ghz HT off | Cooler: ASUS ROG Ryujin 360 | GPU: ASUS Strix RTX3090 OC | MoBo: ASUS Maximus XII Hero | RAM: 64Gb DDR4 @3600 | SSDs: 1Tb Samsung M.2 970EVO Plus (Win10), 1Tb Samsung M.2 970EVO Plus (MSFS), | Case: Fractal Design Torrent | Monitors: HP Reverb G2, 28" ASUS PB287Q 4K | Additional Hardware: TM TCA Captain's Edition, Tobii 5 | OS: Win 11 Pro 64 | Sim: MSFS | BA Virtual | PSXT, RealTraffic, AIG

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be glad if they could test if, for instance, reciprocating engine mixture bug has finally been fixed... Been there since ever, and makes your engine consume more as you initially lean mixture above a certain altitude ( I belive it starts around 3000+ ft ISA ), to only then start to reduce, as it should from the start.

This has always plagued MSFS reciprocating aircraft.

Some new turboprop modelling would be welcomed too. None of the mass civil sims do it correctly, namely modeling a free-runing turbine like that in the Pt-6... 

Test it testers, and get the feedback into the team....

Edited by jcomm

Limited by Main Thread... 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm guessing they're very keen to see how a larger pool of users playing and actually streaming data over the internet works, assuming this is implemented in the this early Alpha build, will be quite key for them to monitor. As far as i'm aware, all builds that have been shown to press, streamers etc have been cached?

 

Anyways, as well as simply flying and keeping my eyes open for anything glaring, i'm looking forward to pushing certain scenarios to the extremes to see how things are being handled there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Alan_A said:

Also - testers will test what Microsoft and Asobo want them to test, not what users want them to test.

 

+1

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jcomm said:

Some new turboprop modelling would be welcomed too. None of the mass civil sims do it correctly, namely modeling a free-runing turbine like that in the Pt-6... 

Didn’t X-Plane claim they model a pt6 correctly in 11.40+ with experimental mode on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Peter Clark said:

Didn’t X-Plane claim they model a pt6 correctly in 11.40+ with experimental mode on?

Maybe, but it's not working like a Pt-6, at least in as far as RPM vs FF go, given fixed Condition.


Limited by Main Thread... 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The average speed of streaming in different continents without it you will not run 4k streaming, and may not be able to stream MSFS at the best detail at 1080p.


 

Raymond Fry.

PMDG_Banner_747_Enthusiast.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not selected for the first Alpha but please, don't report the obvious shortcomings like "bad" photogrammetry and such. But like others said, they will decided what needs to be tested (very likely that they will even use geo-restriction as to where you can fly).


MSFS Alpha Tester, please don't ask me any questions regarding the alpha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe whether the A320 can land in the Hudson 🙂
(Sorry, couldn't resist)

Edited by siggy

Siggy Schwarz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's focused testing sessions, it isn't up to us to decide what they will test 🙂 They will receive such indications for whoever will be in charge of the closed alpha testing phase 🙂


Chock 1.1: "The only thing that whines louder than a jet engine is a flight simmer."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...