CS767 announced

[micstatic 4,299]

https://captainsim.net/products/y767/y763/

 

If they have better performance than their 757 ,maybe it will be a winner?

[Mroberts95 136]

Lame, one variant and no talk of others. Probably will be 70+ still

[regis9 3,999]

Thanks, notably v4.5 only at this point.  Will be interesting to hear their plans for v5.  I enjoy their 757...maybe not perfect but an enjoyable addon so I’ll likely be lined up early for this one.  

[Mroberts95 136]

3 minutes ago, regis9 said:

Thanks, notably v4.5 only at this point.  Will be interesting to hear their plans for v5.  I enjoy their 757...maybe not perfect but an enjoyable addon so I’ll likely be lined up early for this one.  

If the bring the 767 to v5 with more variants I’ll pick it up. Pass until then based on how crappy their 757 internals are etc

[Benjamin J 751]

Glad that we are finally getting a 767, and happy that the base pack will at least contain a fairly 'standard' model - but of course it's just the PW engines. I'm sure the GE will be an addon, similar to what they did with the 757. I'm also, as always, concerned about the performance. The exterior detail is insane. beautiful of course, but I can't see myself being able to use this without a slideshow.

I do like some of the listed features, which are very welcome from their 757, such as an updater. If there's one thing I detest it's having to reinstall addons to update them.

But in the end, for me this package is make or break with the availability of the freighter. I truly have very little reason to get it if not for a freighter variant.

But of course, just wait and see for now. Then wait for their 20$ sale 🙂 

[Wise87 1,275]

They stated sure when others asked about v5 so my guess is their will be a v5 version. Just not sure on release. 

Edited April 21, 2020 by Wise87

[spearmint_flyer 578]

I was an early adopter of the 757 and I will be an early adopter of the 767. Those are my favorite birds. My only gripe is that it was released when most airlines are saying goodbye to them. I truly enjoyed me early simming days with the LEVEL D 767 and have been missing them ever since I had to move on to P3D

 

[micstatic 4,299]

Everyone says the 757 had the worst performance in their hangar. True or false?

[spearmint_flyer 578]

1 minute ago, micstatic said:

Everyone says the 757 had the worst performance in their hangar. True or false?

Not for me, they must not have ever installed the FSLABS and I still fly it. 

 

[ideoplastic 86]

I didn't like the way they released the 757 in bits and pieces and full of bugs like the 757 which ended up costing a lot more than the aircraft series was worth. If the release were to be the pax version with all the different engines followed by the cargo variants, then yes, but unlikely to happen with CS.

[OzWhitey 3,353]

9 minutes ago, micstatic said:

Everyone says the 757 had the worst performance in their hangar. True or false?

False. FSL A320 is significantly worse.

[pedrotrindade 335]

I haven't flown the 757 in a while but I never had any performance problems (running in a i5 2500, gtx970, 8gb Ram, in V4 med/high settings).

[Reader 2,009]

1 hour ago, micstatic said:

Everyone says the 757 had the worst performance in their hangar. True or false?

"Everybody" just means those who wheel themselves out to launch the same old crock of words that they have done ever since once, ten years ago, a CS support person wrote something that upset them. 

Absolutely false. It is an excellent simulation unless there is an obsession with which way electricity runs down a cable, in which case there are other developers ready to take even more money to satisfy the demand.

Edited April 21, 2020 by Reader

[Bob Scott 7,714]

21 minutes ago, micstatic said:

Everyone says the 757 had the worst performance in their hangar. True or false?

No issue with performance here.

[regis9 3,999]

No issues with performance on the 757, the feelthere ejets and FSLabs Airbus are my two worst performing aircraft (still love to fly them both though).