Airports compared - FSX and FS2020

[larshall 4]

https://www.pcgamer.com/see-how-the-new-microsoft-flight-simulators-airports-compare-to-its-predecessor/

 

Edited June 25, 2020 by larshall
Spelling

[polosim 840]

" Vanilla " simulators with 14 years of separation from each other. Impressive.

[mjw25 42]

Ya gotta love this !!!  I do...

[edpatino 1,960]

1 hour ago, polosim said:

" Vanilla " simulators with 14 years of separation from each other. Impressive.

I was about to say the same. Worhtless comparison.

Cheers, Ed

[n4gix 4,947]

1 hour ago, edpatino said:

I was about to say the same. Worhtless comparison.

Cheers, Ed

I beg to disagree Ed. The purpose of the comparison is to point out just how far we've come in terms of realistic world representation. In that respect it's succeeded brilliantly!

[Jazz 1,046]

1 hour ago, edpatino said:

I was about to say the same. Worhtless comparison.

Cheers, Ed

You utterly missed the point.

[Tuskin38 6,460]

Yeah it's not worthless, it's showing am unmodded sim vs a newer unmodded sim. Showing how the base has evolved in the last 14 years.

Once the sim is actually released, probably be even better comparisons videos to show since authors won't be limited to officially released images and footage.

Edited June 25, 2020 by Tuskin38

[edpatino 1,960]

1 hour ago, n4gix said:

I beg to disagree Ed. The purpose of the comparison is to point out just how far we've come in terms of realistic world representation. In that respect it's succeeded brilliantly!

Well, compared to something that happened 14 years ago is not fair anyway.

Cheers, Ed

 

[Tuskin38 6,460]

24 minutes ago, edpatino said:

Well, compared to something that happened 14 years ago is not fair anyway.

It's completely fair. It's a new entry in the franchise.

Edited June 25, 2020 by Tuskin38

[ChaoticBeauty 6,692]

It might be worth noting that the default representations in today's simulators are not that much better compared to what we had 14 years ago.

[n4gix 4,947]

48 minutes ago, ChaoticBeauty said:

It might be worth noting that the default representations in today's simulators are not that much better compared to what we had 14 years ago.

And we have a winner! If the same exact comparison were to have been between P3D v5.x and MSFS, the results wouldn't have been all that much different...

...and P3D v5.x was released just a week ago.

[bean_sprout 1,201]

It's all about the data IMO.

Cheers

bs

[Ron Attwood 3,464]

1 hour ago, n4gix said:

If the same exact comparison were to have been between P3D v5.x and MSFS, the results wouldn't have been all that much different...

Add a sprinkling of Orbx...

[edpatino 1,960]

1 hour ago, n4gix said:

And we have a winner! If the same exact comparison were to have been between P3D v5.x and MSFS, the results wouldn't have been all that much different...

...and P3D v5.x was released just a week ago.

In your opinion, of course.

Cheers, Ed

[Tuskin38 6,460]

3 hours ago, Ron Attwood said:

Add a sprinkling of Orbx...

That wouldn't be a fair comparison then. The MSFS media doesn't have addons (yet).

Default Vs. Default is the only fair comparison for right now.

Edited June 25, 2020 by Tuskin38