Nothing sofar. 
I guess LM has learned from the release of V5 that needed 2 Hotfixes.

56 minutes ago, GSalden said:

Nothing sofar. 
I guess LM has learned from the release of V5 that needed 2 Hotfixes.

LOL! If I were LM and I had V5.1 ready to go and it was the very best release ever and I mean perfect, I would not release it for a few more weeks. Why...right now the entire flight sim world is just nothing but FS2020 nut cases running a muck screaming about the pretty pictures. The flight sim sector of the interwebs have become the Portland of the real world.🙈

9 minutes ago, shivers9 said:

LOL! If I were LM and I had V5.1 ready to go and it was the very best release ever and I mean perfect, I would not release it for a few more weeks. Why...right now the entire flight sim world is just nothing but FS2020 nut cases running a muck screaming about the pretty pictures. The flight sim sector of the interwebs have become the Portland of the real world.🙈

That might just be what LM intends to do.

Asobo is not able to fix all issues within a few weeks. It has to be done without rush.
And as we know that 3rd party Airliners will not be present this year ( AS stated more than a few months ) , I guess that when the MSFS dust has come down that will be the moment LM might release V5.1 with hopefully an improved EA....

Yeah, flying on Cessna is starting to tire

I wonder how quickly gamers get tired of it? You fly and nothing happens. No action.

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by BMW969

13 minutes ago, BMW969 said:

Yeah, flying on Cessna is starting to tire

I wonder how quickly gamers get tired of it? You fly and nothing happens. No action.

If you haven't you might try the TBM930 it's not bad at all.  What 'action' are you getting in other flying games?  I find the whole distinction between game and sim largely arbitrary.  FSCaptain helps add meaning to P3D for me--w/o it, it would just be another flight game.

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by Noel

29 minutes ago, Noel said:

I find the whole distinction between game and sim largely arbitrary.

I think it really boils down to each one of us. MS going back many years has sort of fostered that idea of always calling it a game. The reason for that I think has been about the money. The truth is that I and folks who like the home cockpit type set up, for lack of a better name, do not pay the MS dev cost. There is just not enough of us. It is the younger guys who have never seen more than the back of the seat in front of them on a tube liner that pays the bills and makes it possible for the rest of us to have the base of a sim. We then have what we need to start with multi monitors, switches and other add ons. We do that because we like the tactile feel those buttons and add ons. It does not mean that gamers are stupid or that we are smarter. It is that we "simmers" have different wants and needs. 

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by shivers9
speeling error LOL

3 minutes ago, shivers9 said:

I think it really boils down to each one of us. MS going back many years has sort of fostered that idea of always calling it a game. The reason for that I think has been about the money. The truth is that I and folks who like the home cockpit type set up, for lack of a better name, do not pay the MS dev cost. There is just not enough of us. It is the younger guys who have never seen more than the back of the seat in front of them on a tube liner that pays the bills and makes it possible for the rest of us to have the base of a sim. We then have what we need to start with multi monitors, switches and other add ons. We do that because we like the tactile feel those buttons and add ons. It does not mean that gamers are stupid or that we are smarter. It is that we "simmers" have different wants and needs. 

Here's the thing I see:  most people on AVSIM and similar sites believe to call themselves a 'simmer' has ego-oriented connotations they feel aren't ascribable to 'gamers', so IMM it's largely an arbitrary, ego-oriented identification.  If you went to the extreme of home cockpit complete w/ multiple screens, high end yokes and intruments, on to full motion simulation platforms, then I think you've earned the 'right' to call yourself a simmer.   The rest of us pretenders on no uncertain terms are....gamers, and God knows, that is a bad label to admit to in this environment!  At least MS was honest about it, whereas LM demanded thru their EULA you don't dare admit to using the product for 'entertainment', which again I dare say is 97% of all use of non-commericial P3D buyers.

2 minutes ago, Noel said:

Here's the thing I see:  most people on AVSIM and similar sites believe to call themselves a 'simmer' has ego-oriented connotations they feel aren't ascribable to 'gamers', so IMM it's largely an arbitrary, ego-oriented identification.  If you went to the extreme of home cockpit complete w/ multiple screens, high end yokes and intruments, on to full motion simulation platforms, then I think you've earned the 'right' to call yourself a simmer.   The rest of us pretenders on no uncertain terms are....gamers, and God knows, that is a bad label to admit to in this environment!  At least MS was honest about it, whereas LM demanded thru their EULA you don't dare admit to using the product for 'entertainment', which again I dare say is 97% of all use of non-commericial P3D buyers.

You just want to blow off steam and argue. I don't want to play.

  

14 minutes ago, Noel said:

At least MS was honest about it, whereas LM demanded thru their EULA you don't dare admit to using the product for 'entertainment', which again I dare say is 97% of all use of non-commericial P3D buyers.

Perhaps LM had other reasons unknown to us mortals. Like LM not wanting to ever be slightly seen as an entertainment company when in fact they are a hugely successful Military Contractor that sells Military Aircraft and Weapon Systems, or FAA regulations or even MS requiring just that. Food for thought.

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by RamonB
Quote

Whatever.  I'm a gamer who uses flight sim software and golf software, and enjoy them both immensely.  The difference between RL golf and RL piloting is similar--one is pretend, the other is real w/ real consequences.  In this regard TGC2019 is a better 'sim' than any desktop 'flight simulator' is, where there are no consequences for mistakes made.  FSCaptain helps a bit in this regard by monitoring your performance as a pretend pilot.

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by Noel

3 minutes ago, Noel said:

LOL!

If You know the real reason, then by all means. Please do tell us?

Just now, RamonB said:

If You know the real reason, then by all means. Please do tell us?

I'm sorry Ramon that was directed at Sam who wrote off my comments as being argumentative.  His statements of course weren't argumentative which was a direct response to my comment, but my response was deemed argumentative.  LOL!

4 hours ago, BMW969 said:

Have you heard anything about P3Dv5.1? It's time to show up!)

Lets hope when they are ready and the product shines. (Unless its night flying Lol ) 

I haven't fired up MSFS in over a week, I've been flying Airliners in P3Dv5 which satisfies my needs. MSFS does look great for VFR, but for IFR it has a long way to go to get anywhere near P3Dv5.

12 minutes ago, Noel said:

I'm sorry Ramon that was directed at Sam who wrote off my comments as being argumentative.  His statements of course weren't argumentative which was a direct response to my comment, but my response was deemed argumentative.  LOL!

Understood, All is well.

Cheers.

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by RamonB

1 hour ago, Noel said:

Here's the thing I see:  most people on AVSIM and similar sites believe to call themselves a 'simmer' has ego-oriented connotations they feel aren't ascribable to 'gamers', so IMM it's largely an arbitrary, ego-oriented identification.  If you went to the extreme of home cockpit complete w/ multiple screens, high end yokes and intruments, on to full motion simulation platforms, then I think you've earned the 'right' to call yourself a simmer.   The rest of us pretenders on no uncertain terms are....gamers, and God knows, that is a bad label to admit to in this environment!  At least MS was honest about it, whereas LM demanded thru their EULA you don't dare admit to using the product for 'entertainment', which again I dare say is 97% of all use of non-commericial P3D buyers.

I’m not a gamer. I use racing car simulators, some use train simulators, farming simulators and who knows what else simulators. 
 

But now all of a sudden, after years of Microsoft producing ‘flight simulators’, the latest Microsoft Flight ‘Simulator’ is now all of a sudden a game? 
 

Until I can shoot angry pink flying bunnies attacking me from the sky for points, it’s a simulator.