4 hours ago, sem said:

im getting half the preformance at LBGG compared to KIAD, i dont hate on aerosoft, but you have to admit they overmarket their products with 'professional' ''mega airport'' ''extended'', or all the release and go approaches: let a company make a scenery, only update in 2 years with pbr, still a lot of bugs, profit. the preformance is something that a lot of people have noticed, and instead of aerosoft helping him by improving the airport with quality of life fixes, they picked it up, put their name on it, gave it a fancy font on the front and sold it.

LLBG has always been one of the best performing add-ons throughout all it's iterations and this one is no different.  Performance is smooth as butter for me.  They've been quite responsive with fixes and very responsive in the forums. I've seen lot's of other sceneries from other developers require a .1 release imeediately after release to clean up issues as well.  So your only "valid" gripe is no PBR and if that's a show stopper then no one is forcing you to buy it and use it.. 

2 hours ago, fluffyflops said:

because they want to put it in a box and get it on amazon as quickly as possible.  If people stopped buying unfinished junk they would stop releasing unfinished junk  

This is far from "junk"   

4 minutes ago, psolk said:

 They've been quite responsive with fixes and very responsive in the forums. I've seen lot's of other sceneries from other developers require a .1 release imeediately after release to clean up issues as well. 

they should be.  people paid good money YET AGAIN for a product that was YET AGAIN rushed out the door without proper "quality control". 

On 10/9/2020 at 3:24 PM, JoeFackel said:

The airport looks not bad so far and has good performance but i feel there is plenty room for improvement, especially vegetation and surrounding buildings.

I never played around with ADE myself, but is it very complicated to place trees and generic buildings that can be seen on the underlaying texture? 

ADE cannot do things like that. It’s for taxiways, runways, gates and all the lines that connect them amongst its many uses. Physical objects like trees require different tools.

1 minute ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

ADE cannot do things like that. It’s for taxiways, runways, gates and all the lines that connect them amongst its many uses. Physical objects like trees require different tools.

i believe someone someone has made an updated afcad for the Ils freq/ident and beam width  (which was apprently wrong??)  

you didnt think Aerosoft were ever going to release an accurate one did you.?? they rarely have done in the past

@fluffyflops, Aerosoft are just the publishers. That is a quick fix in any case. In all my years of buying 3rd party airports I’ve only ever seen one AFD that was error free when run through ADE fault finder. It’s common practice for AFDs to be neglected whoever the developer is.

6 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

@fluffyflops, Aerosoft are just the publishers. That is a quick fix in any case. In all my years of buying 3rd party airports I’ve only ever seen one AFD that was error free when run through ADE fault finder. It’s common practice for AFDs to be neglected whoever the developer is.

how long do you think it takes to load up a chart and copy and paste the correct freq/ ident ?? into AFD  what.. say 2 mins if that ??

how long do you think it takes to double check youve done it ??  what.. say another 2 mins...

Thats a whopping 4 minutes,  lets say rounded up to 5 minutes.   a whole 5 mins...  as mentioned before.  Its not rocket science is it Ray ?  a 5 minute job they cant be bothered to do and they wonder why they get a bit of  a hard time..

Its basics. pure basics..  It would be like me constantly forgeting to put notams into a flightplan at work.  Finally ive get sacked. 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited October 11, 20205 yr by fluffyflops

12 minutes ago, fluffyflops said:

i believe someone someone has made an updated afcad for the Ils freq/ident and beam width  (which was apprently wrong??)  

you didnt think Aerosoft were ever going to release an accurate one did you.?? they rarely have done in the past

I believe this is a single man development team "published" by Aerosoft.... Seems you are going to bash anything they publish at this point to the regardless of facts.  

2 minutes ago, psolk said:

I believe this is a single man development team "published" by Aerosoft.... Seems you are going to bash anything they publish at this point to the regardless of facts.  

which they didnt quality control properly like all their products of late.  Thats why I bash them,  Id bash anyone who constantly sold unchecked products. 

as mentioned it takes 5 mins to check the ils are correct. they cant even be bothered to do that.

 

Edited October 11, 20205 yr by fluffyflops

1 minute ago, fluffyflops said:

which they didnt quality control properly like all their products of late.  Thats why I bash them

Ok, we get it but this isn't a thread about Aerosoft so please stop beating the horse, it's dead now this is about LLBG

 

14 minutes ago, fluffyflops said:

how long do you think it takes to load up a chart and copy and paste the correct freq/ ident ?? into AFD  what.. say 2 mins if that ??

how long do you think it takes to double check youve done it ??  what.. say another 2 mins...

Thats a whopping 4 minutes,  lets say rounded up to 5 minutes.   a whole 5 mins...  as mentioned before.  Its not rocket science is it Ray ?  a 5 minute job they cant be bothered to do and they wonder why they get a bit of  a hard time..

Its basics. pure basics..  It would be like me constantly forgeting to put notams into a flightplan at work.  Finally ive get sacked. 

Who are “they”? I’ve already said Aerosoft are just the publishers. They don’t vet the scenery as far as I know any more than SimMarket vet theirs. They are just the shop.

@fluffyflops, if you want to vent your spleen over this I suggest you do it on the Aerosoft forum, not here. Mathijs rarely visits this place anyway.

19 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

@fluffyflops,Mathijs rarely visits this place anyway.

thats doesnt surprise me

Edited October 11, 20205 yr by fluffyflops

Found out no date for the new update to be released despite developer summiting to Aerosoft on Friday so my question is are Aerosoft inspecting the update is this something that is done? I noticed the hotfix was released in about an hour 

22 hours ago, psolk said:

LLBG has always been one of the best performing add-ons throughout all it's iterations and this one is no different.  Performance is smooth as butter for me.  They've been quite responsive with fixes and very responsive in the forums. I've seen lot's of other sceneries from other developers require a .1 release imeediately after release to clean up issues as well.  So your only "valid" gripe is no PBR and if that's a show stopper then no one is forcing you to buy it and use it.. 

if you dont demand better software you wont get it.

you are making the argument that LLBG is good preforming only to you while not comparing it to other airports. it shouldnt be ''allright'' paying 24 dollars for ''allright'' pixels isnt worth its price, it may be good but still, im not making the argument against the airport, im making the argument against aerosoft. its been made by one person, shipped and sold, i installed it and my orbx broke, the afcads were messed up and the sode gates were busted. nevertheless the general stigma with aerosoft is that they sell unfinished products, but there is no valid argument against this since its subjective. but the general 60fps pbr standard is here and to me it isnt holding up to it