Henrik Nielsen's Global AI Ship Traffic for MSFS

[JimBrown 596]

Flightsim.to must be getting hammered by everyone downloading the new package... I'm getting about 15 Kb/s on a 400 Mb/s connection.

This could take a while... Maybe I'll try tomorrow when most people are back at work. 😉

...jim

 

[KL791 2,272]

We try hard to test their limits, but still I think the first release of the Global AI Ship Traffic V1 was the biggest test from our side as it was both a very big package and announced up front 😄 Hope to put them to the real test with GAIST Ultra sometime in November 😄 😄 😄

[jetlag 65]

With traffic on the Swiss lakes? 🙂

[CarlosHenriqueDutra 28]

Once again thanks for giving all of this to the community for free.

[Car147 2,277]

An amasing piece of work, and to think you and others on your team have done this for the good of the community is highly commended.

[cobalt 798]

Just curious -- I see some ships on the Great Lakes, but far fewer than are showing up on Little Nav Map. Is this normal, and what might be the reason?

[Bernard Ducret 790]

Great, great job really! Today in Singapore, Barcelona and San Diego it was amazing!

I also had a good laugh in San Diego: the American fleet must not leave port very often - if at all (I know it is not part of your package), because trees are growing on most destroyers, aircraft carriers, frigates and so on...

Perhaps Asobo tried to camouflage the US Pacific fleet behind this vegetation on the Pentagon request.

Edited October 6, 2021 by Bernard Ducret

[FlyAndFight 37]

Thank you for all of the hard work involved in providing the community with a priceless gift (for free!).

[KL791 2,272]

13 hours ago, cobalt said:

Just curious -- I see some ships on the Great Lakes, but far fewer than are showing up on Little Nav Map. Is this normal, and what might be the reason?

Yes, it is normal - in LittleNavMap you will - depending on what you have installed and your settings - see the follwoing:

• "Global AI Ship Traffic Great Lakes" - ships should display in LittleNavMap AND on the surface of the lake
• "Global AI Ship Traffic V2" ships will appear in LittleNavMap but NOT appear on the surface of the lake due to the bug in MSFS resulting in AI ships no displaying at the surface of elevated water surfaces
• default leisure boats; they will be in LittleNavMap but they do not display on the Lake Surface due to the bug in MSFS due to the same bug

If you in LittleNavMap point your mouse on a ship icon it will display the ship name. Ships belonging to the "Global AI Ship Traffic Great Lakes" and which should appear all have names ending with _L, _E, S, or _O depending on which lake. _L for Lake Huron and Lake Michigan, _S for Lake Superior, _E for Lake Erie, _O for lake Ontario. Those not having this ending will not display until Asobo fixes the bug. You will often see two ship icons almost on top of each other as routes in "Global AI Ship Traffic Great Lakes" is a copy of the original routes with only minor adjustments.

Once Asobo fixes the bug, the traffic for the Great Lakes already included in Global AI Ship Traffic V2 will display and you can uninstall the Global AI Ship Traffic Great Lakes...

 

Edited October 7, 2021 by KL791

[cobalt 798]

Many thanks. Now I understand.

[Stoopy 1,571]

I just want to give a huge THANKS, one more time, to all involved in this fantastic project, 

So there I was, diddy-boppin' around the San Francisco Bay in the Bell 47G so I could check out some of the ships up close, after passing over them in the MilViz Corsair while preparing to land at Oakland after a flight up the coast from Van Nuys.  Anyway, getting up close to some of these vessels reveals the awe-inspiring level of detail and work put in by the team.  It's like the gift that keeps on giving!

Also, I assume the cool Catamaran that I spotted off the end of RWY26 at KOAK (last shot below) is one of yours as well?  Very nice.  

I patiently await the day when perhaps we might be able to land on the shipborne helipads  🤙

Edited October 8, 2021 by Stoopy

[mikegrr 109]

Does the water fix on flightsim.to for LA allow more ships to be seen in the Los Angles area, or San Diego?

[bofhlusr 453]

4 hours ago, Stoopy said:

I just want to give a huge THANKS, one more time, to all involved in this fantastic project, 

So there I was, diddy-boppin' around the San Francisco Bay in the Bell 47G so I could check out some of the ships up close, after passing over them in the MilViz Corsair while preparing to land at Oakland after a flight up the coast from Van Nuys.  Anyway, getting up close to some of these vessels reveals the awe-inspiring level of detail and work put in by the team.  It's like the gift that keeps on giving!

Also, I assume the cool Catamaran that I spotted off the end of RWY26 at KOAK (last shot below) is one of yours as well?  Very nice.  

...

Very nice pictures.

Are you able to land in RWY30 in KOAK??

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/t7pzblwa9fiv1so/Microsoft Flight Simulator - 1.19.9.0 2021-09-19 16-57-40.mp4?raw=1

[Prop and Classic 23]

Hi guys, I have Ship Traffic from ORBX (Vessels Enhanced AI & Vessels Global Shipping). Is this traffic compatible with the installed traffic from ORBX? Can I put it next to it without conflicts it in the simulator? 

[David Roch 1,982]

Yes, no problem at all.
Ship traffic sliders at 100%.