1 hour ago, Manny said:

Yes, we give it  a 4 star/5 star cause for $23 bucks, we get more than Coronado gave us on their  GA 182 for $35.

Why are you incapable of properly spelling 'Carenado'?  Do you have some personal vendetta against them that you don't want to type out their name correctly for some reason so it won't show up in searches?  Or do you need to just make a little extra dig against them every time you mention them (beyond comparing their MSFS products to this half-baked 737 in a negative light)? What's the beef here? Did they break into your house and steal your puppy or something? 

The 182 has a coherent internal/external 3D model that is a lot more complete than this 737.  It's a correct representation of the aircraft it's supposed to be, not thrown together bits of 6 other things. 

You know what I want to be doing in MSFS, is paying $24+ for poorly made addons and then digging through forum threads to find community "fixes" for them.  Yup, that's how I want to spend my time. I already spend enough time tracking community fixes for Asobo's planes without needing them for things I paid 10x as much for.

Quote

Enough money to keep investing into the project and fix the biggest issues including the ugly/missing textures. I hope this is just the start and they will keep updating it, shades of Zibo 737.

0 evidence this developer will do that.  They will probably just move on to the next aircraft that they can buy some off the shelf assets for and throw together with stuff that's already in the sim for a quick buck.

Edited February 10, 20215 yr by marsman2020

2 minutes ago, marsman2020 said:

Why are you incapable of properly spelling 'Carenado'?

I think it’s spell check... happens to me especially when set to US English, only if set to Latin American Spanish would it likely not correct, but never checked.

carenado is Spanish for cowl or fairing, BTW...

Be sure to take notes there will be a quiz!

16 minutes ago, marsman2020 said:

Why are you incapable of properly spelling 'Carenado'?  Do you have some personal vendetta against them that you don't want to type out their name correctly for some reason so it won't show up in searches?  Or do you need to just make a little extra dig against them every time you mention them (beyond comparing their MSFS products to this half-baked 737 in a negative light)? What's the beef here? Did they break into your house and steal your puppy or something? 

 

Maybe it's a language thing, because Carenado and Coronado have distinctly different meanings.

Apparently Carenado is a technical aircraft term meaning fiberglass, or faring. 

Coronado means crowned, and there's a famous Coronado Hotel in San Diego.

1 hour ago, FS++ said:

Not sure I understand the issue keep in mind MSFS 2020 doesn't support 2D panels.

What you can popup is a screen, like a G1000 PDF screen. What you will note is this 'popup' does not include the G1000 knobs that a true G1000 2D popup gauge (vs just a screen popup) would include. So in this case you still have to use the G1000's VC knobs to make changes. However, if you popup a touch screen, like on the center console of the TBM 930 or perhaps an FMC, then you can click on the popup screen's touch keys to make at least some changes.

Al

Edited February 10, 20215 yr by ark

37 minutes ago, marsman2020 said:

 

The 182 has a coherent internal/external 3D model that is a lot more complete than this 737.  It's a correct representation of the aircraft it's supposed to be, not thrown together bits of 6 other things. 

 

I don't dislike Coronado. (My spell check does not flag it as misspelt) I bought their Mooney and the their Twin. I would have bought the 812 if it had analog guages. Instead they "stole" the G1000  from ASOBO I believe? LOL 🙂

3 hours ago, WestAir said:

To be fair, the highly acclaimed FBW A32N can't even fly a star right now, has half the proper fuel flow, and has a CoG fifty feet from its real life counterpart*. This is with several devs, not just one.

Credit where it's due right now.

*hyperbole

Ouch !! that stung lol !

7 minutes ago, Manny said:

(My spell check does not flag it as misspelt)

Because it’s not misspelled, it’s just not the same word...🤣

On 2/8/2021 at 6:01 PM, jbdbow1970 said:

Well its already better than the Default 737. I'm sure some mods could fix it up a bit.

You mean default 787?

On 2/8/2021 at 6:25 PM, Manny said:

Did you purchase Coronado's 182? How much did you pay for that? if not, how much would you pay for it? Do you believe the work gone into this is less than the 182 from Coronado?

You mean Carenado?

2 hours ago, TomCYYZ said:

A reviewer at Simmarket mentioned that the Squawk function was "INOP". Isn't it necessary for Pro-ATC or any other ATC program as well as for use on Vatsim?

I'm pretty sure this add-on isn't really aimed at Vatsimmers. Technically it isn't completely inoperable; it auto-fills the code when the default ATC assigns a code to you after you have used the read back function. But it is true that it can't be manually set, which is something to be aware of if you aren't using the default ATC as this would indeed be a bit of a deal-breaker. 

Edited February 10, 20215 yr by Chock

Well I've flown it a few times but it's not for me. Doesn't feel authentic. Cockpit is horrid. More like a toy. I'm not bashing it because it was only £20. C'est la vie.

20 minutes ago, perohijo said:

You mean default 787?

Sarcasm notice the green font.

No I mean IMO there should have been a working default 737 in the sim in the first place than stuff like this would not be happening. I mean what was MS/Asobo thinking?(oh everyone is going to go out and buy a 150$ PMDG 737) and we just take a cut from them (marketplace). I don't blame this guy one bit for delivering a 737 even if its low quality it flies better than the default airliners LMAO, heck I may just go buy 5 copies in spite of the naysayers, naw not really.

Just now, jbdbow1970 said:

Sarcasm notice the green font.

No I mean IMO there should have been a working default 737 in the sim in the first place than stuff like this would not be happening. I mean what was MS/Asobo thinking?(oh everyone is going to go out and buy a 150$ PMDG 737) and we just take a cut from them (marketplace). I don't blame this guy one bit for delivering a 737 even if its low quality it flies better than the default airliners LMAO, heck I may just go buy 5 copies in spite of the naysayers, naw not really.

yeah I just downloaded it. We'll see. You right, you would think that Microsoft would have placed priority on the 737, but since is Asobo, and Asobo is french.....there you go. I'll fly it and if it works, albeit not like a real study aircraft, at least I hope it flies ok until something better comes up. 

Although there are a few issues with the accuracy of the model, it still looks pretty nice in some different liveries:

Edited February 10, 20215 yr by Chock

Has anyone spotted a Southwest livery, doesn’t matter if desert, beach ball (canyon blue) or hotdog on a stick (heart livery)