Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
bobcat999

What will you do with your performance increase?...

Recommended Posts

On 7/3/2021 at 6:58 AM, Der Zeitgeist said:

My goal is getting a stable 60 FPS on my Ryzen 3900X paired with my RTX 3070 at 1440p. From what I've seen, this might be possible. 

Chasing FPS, rather than smoothness of flight, is a fallacy going back to FSX and FS9. In MSFS, locking at 30 FPS generally gives ideal performance, as attested by many here including me. Reminds me of the Horsepower Wars of the 1960s, when having a car with a higher horsepower engine than your neighbor -- even if the speeds achievable with the higher HPs were legal only on a race track --- served mainly as a boost to the (usually) male ego.

Edited by cobalt

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do 2 ch...... at the same time (You all remember the line from Office Space insert it here) lol with all the new performance increase...lol

 

This performance will help all of us stuck in the gpu shortage but the prices are coming down (just like I predicted) lol - market will get flooded on ebay for used cards...

 

Edited by Skywolf

Active Pattern: MSFS2020 | In Hangar: P3Dv6, P3Dv5.4  

How I Evaluate Third Party Sim Addon Developers

Refined P3Dv5.0 HF2 Settings Part1 (has MaddogX) and older thread Part 2 (has PMDG 747)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I might attempt to finally try flying an airliner like the A320 or 787.

Right now on my weak old system airliners are off limits because I get very poor performance. It will be interesting to see how it compares to the current build. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cobalt said:

Chasing FPS, rather than smoothness of flight, is a fallacy going back to FSX and FS9. In MSFS, locking at 30 FPS generally gives ideal performance, as attested by many here including me. Reminds me of the Horsepower Wars of the 1960s, when having a car with a higher horsepower engine than your neighbor -- even if the speeds achievable with the higher HPs were legal only on a race track --- served mainly as a boost to the (usually) male ego.

I think chasing FPS up to your display refresh rate (60 for most) is a worth while endeavor. The differences between 30 and 60FPS are noticeable, especially if you pan any view at all or spend any time looking at terrain closer than the horizon.

I was fortunate enough to achieve 60FPS at 4K (mostly ultra terrain and high graphics settings) before I stopped playing a few months back. I’m hoping if I come back to it a few months from now, that it’s feasible to maintain that performance with higher LOD (>200) and/or some live traffic. Flying around with empty skies and airports before was an immersion killer. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it came just in time to prevent my brain to buy a 3080ti monster, what I will do is to save that money for another month, until my brain comes again...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My wallet and my wife will be very happy as I wont have to invest in a new state of the art pc....I'm perfectly fine and quite happy with locked 30, I may increase eye candy a bit with the extra headroom.

  • Like 1

Windows 11 | Asus Z690-P D4 | i7 12700KF 5.2GHz | 32GB G.Skill (XMP II) | EVGA 3060Ti FTW Ultra | TrackIr v5 | Honeycomb Alfa + Bravo

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, cobalt said:

Chasing FPS, rather than smoothness of flight, is a fallacy going back to FSX and FS9. In MSFS, locking at 30 FPS generally gives ideal performance, as attested by many here including me. Reminds me of the Horsepower Wars of the 1960s, when having a car with a higher horsepower engine than your neighbor -- even if the speeds achievable with the higher HPs were legal only on a race track --- served mainly as a boost to the (usually) male ego.

Apart from high-detail handcrafted airports and flying complex airplanes, I currently get 40-50 FPS in normal flight (limited by the CPU/main thread). So getting a stable 60 should be quite achievable after sim update 5. Going beyond 30 FPS gives you a much smoother experience, and this doesn't have anything to do with the male ego.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm simply looking to achieve a stable and smooth 30fps in all situations. If I get that, I will be extremely happy.

  • Like 2

Howard
MSI Mag B650 Tomahawk MB, Ryzen7-7800X3D CPU@5ghz, Arctic AIO II 360 cooler, Nvidia RTX3090 GPU, 32gb DDR5@6000Mhz, SSD/2Tb+SSD/500Gb+OS, Corsair 1000W PSU, Philips BDM4350UC 43" 4K IPS, MFG Crosswinds, TQ6 Throttle, Fulcrum One Yoke
My FlightSim YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@skyhigh776

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, cobalt said:

Chasing FPS, rather than smoothness of flight, is a fallacy going back to FSX and FS9. In MSFS, locking at 30 FPS generally gives ideal performance, as attested by many here including me. Reminds me of the Horsepower Wars of the 1960s, when having a car with a higher horsepower engine than your neighbor -- even if the speeds achievable with the higher HPs were legal only on a race track --- served mainly as a boost to the (usually) male ego.

Times have changed my friend, with a modern engine taking advantage of the latest tech, high frames should and ultimately will be proved to be achievable.

Asobo are dragging the FS genre and av community thinking into the 21st century - some clearly are still resisting though 😂

 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Ryzen 5900x - 32gb 3600Mhz RAM - Asus Strix X570-F Motherboard - ASUS TUF OC RTX 3090 - AOC AGON 32" 144Hz - LG OLED55CX5LB 55" Smart 4K Ultra HD HDR OLED - 1TB Sabrent Rocket M.2 + 2TB PCIe4.0 NVMe drive's - Samsung EVO 670 SSD 250gb - 2TB 3.5" HDD - Honeycomb Alpha Flight controls Yoke - Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog. T Flight Rudder Pedals - Trackir

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 I take your point, but if I am experiencing perfectly smooth flight at 30 FPS, how would higher FPS improve this? Is the goal to have the highest possible number appear in your FPS window? Or is it smooth flight? For me personally, I care only about the latter and don't give a hoot about the former.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cobalt said:

 I take your point, but if I am experiencing perfectly smooth flight at 30 FPS, how would higher FPS improve this? Is the goal to have the highest possible number appear in your FPS window? Or is it smooth flight? For me personally, I care only about the latter and don't give a hoot about the former.

Beautifully said.


How long does it take for 'smug' to wear off after buying an EV?

"It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled". Whoever said it wasn't wrong!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, cobalt said:

 I take your point, but if I am experiencing perfectly smooth flight at 30 FPS, how would higher FPS improve this? Is the goal to have the highest possible number appear in your FPS window? Or is it smooth flight? For me personally, I care only about the latter and don't give a hoot about the former.

Try comparing perfectly smooth 30fps vs perfectly smooth 60fps...there is a perceptible difference (but the latter was unfathomable / unachievable before). I'm finally looking at jumping into VR with a bit more available headroom. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not just the performance increase, but the restored tree lod will hopefully allow me to get back to my UK tour north of Carlisle, and then on to the Nordics.

Gonna give msfs a rest until the update I think, and try and clear at least some of my backlog of unplayed Steam sale games!

  • Like 1

i910900k, RTX 3090, 32GB DDR4 RAM, AW3423DW, Ruddy girt big mug of Yorkshire Tea

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DylanM said:

Try comparing perfectly smooth 30fps vs perfectly smooth 60fps...there is a perceptible difference (but the latter was unfathomable / unachievable before). I'm finally looking at jumping into VR with a bit more available headroom. 

How can there be a perceptible difference between two perfect flights? Or two perfect anythings, for that matter? The phrase "a distinction without a difference" comes to mind here!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully run clouds on ultra. Right now have them on High. Also, enjoy better FPS in built up areas. Running a 5700XT, typically 30-40 FPS. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...