Updated list of Future aircraft

[idloveit 18]

Still no 757 in sight :( 

[bobcat999 8,444]

9 minutes ago, Puddin said:

Lancaster ..4 merlins in harmony. The Derwent/ Ladybower reservoir is going to get some..can’t wait.

@Puddin I think the dam is now modelled quite well in the latest Orbx UK scenery pack.  I will check tonight.

As for the rest.  It's a great list - I want most of the stuff in there - Priority on the Kodiak and Twin Otter for me!    

Obviously the Microsoft JU-25 is mislabelled (JU-52).  That made me sit up and take notice for a minute!

Edited August 20, 2021 by bobcat999

[Puddin 70]

3 minutes ago, bobcat999 said:

@PuddinI think the dam is now modelled quite well in the latest Orbx UK scenery pack.  I will check tonight.

As for the rest.  It's a great list - I want most of the stuff in there!  

Obviously the Microsoft JU-25 is mislabelled (JU-52).  That made me sit up and take notice for a minute!

Yes a much needed update from Orbx makes it doable with the towers modelled.

I don’t know how if I can use the coat hanger bomb site in VR!

Certainly will try a full flight at night when this materialises.

Always left in awe on what our forebears achieved without the modern aids we have now.

[cepact 517]

I'm tired of waiting. I've had enough of the FBW A320. I desperately need a decent long-hauler (PMDG 777 / 747). I wish I could jump in time to next year

[idloveit 18]

24 minutes ago, idloveit said:

Still no 757 in sight 😞

Ignore this - i just re-read the list!

[Dominique_K 10,133]

36 minutes ago, Noooch said:

I just made an thread about that list on the official forum calling for more novelty 🙂

https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/please-3rd-parties-be-original/443977

A CL 415 would be nice, I would fly more often in my region. We have a lake not far where they scoop their water !

And I would welcome a A400M or C-130 too.

But, ASobo has to do its homework on the turboprop simulation first. 

[HighTowers 1,434]

2 hours ago, Glenn Fitzpatrick said:

Two totally different aircraft .

Or did you mean the PC21 ?

No I mean the PC-12.  Still single engine but a turbo prop.  Its a blast to fly.  That extra power is great in mountainous regions

[bobcat999 8,444]

29 minutes ago, Puddin said:

Yes a much needed update from Orbx makes it doable with the towers modelled.

I don’t know how if I can use the coat hanger bomb site in VR!

Certainly will try a full flight at night when this materialises.

Always left in awe on what our forebears achieved without the modern aids we have now.

Yes, a coat hanger, and two lamps focused downwards on the water for a height reference. No GPS magenta line to follow in those days!   

[af1134 9]

5 hours ago, roland said:

No proper King Air in the pipeline, very disappointing!

 

100% agree

[Glenn Fitzpatrick 3,798]

2 hours ago, HighTowers said:

No I mean the PC-12.  Still single engine but a turbo prop.  Its a blast to fly.  That extra power is great in mountainous regions

Oh, well Iris is a small Aussie developer that specialises in military stuff most of the time, hence the PC9 .  His P3D stuff is things like the C-27J Spartan and the F22 Raptor.

The Jabiru is not a typical Iris product.

Edited August 20, 2021 by Glenn Fitzpatrick

[flyinpilot212121 724]

Are the airplanes in this list confirmed somewhere by the developers? I see they have majestic dash 8 listed, but don’t remember ever hearing from them at all in regards to msfs? 

[ckyliu 1,749]

13 minutes ago, flyinpilot212121 said:

I see they have majestic dash 8 listed, but don’t remember ever hearing from them at all in regards to msfs? 

The list contains links to their main source for each aircraft. In Majestic's case, this is a third party in September 2020 quoting Oleksiy Frolov saying “certainly thinking of adding MSFS as a platform for our Dash-8 addons” - hardly a firm commitment.

Edited August 20, 2021 by ckyliu

[Pilot2PC 25]

They forgot to include the freeware KC-10 by Aero Dynamics, made in collaboration with real KC-10 pilots/engineers :

Spoiler

 

 

Edited August 20, 2021 by Pilot2PC

[flyinpilot212121 724]

47 minutes ago, ckyliu said:

The list contains links to their main source for each aircraft. In Majestic's case, this is a third party in September 2020 quoting Oleksiy Frolov saying “certainly thinking of adding MSFS as a platform for our Dash-8 addons” - hardly a firm commitment.

Ah gotcha, I didn’t click any links but not holding my breath for the majestic to make it to msfs unfortunately, hope I’m wrong tho.

Thanks

[crosswind 825]

15 hours ago, jbdbow1970 said:

Leonardo's Maddog X MD82 (they did not even mention) will be in MSFS before the Majestic Q400 and at this moment a big? if it ever will be.

While your statement regarding the Maddog may be correct in being released before the MJC Q400, it is what it is.

One is always more than welcome to be vocal about our business practices, and intensions regarding the simulation community.  However, if you are going to speak on our behalf then make sure that your information is at least correct. 

1.  Our time line to releasing a product are decisions that we make and are not determined by being rushed to release because of what other developers are doing. 

2.  You previously mentioned in another post "Majestic Q400 they will be replaced just like FS Labs with the A320 with a better version". If that is to be, we have no control over that.  It is a free market open to anyone, and the new platform has seen some impressive work coming forward from new development groups and we hope it continues as it just makes this hobby/profession even better.  Everything good/bad thing or experience in life only lasts for a time, but until then we will still plan on doing what we do, and that is providing quality add-ons for the community and our business clients.

We at Majestic did not just hint to or hesitate to the fact that we will be developing for the MSFS platform.  We are in fact going to be bring our products over to MSFS, BUT not before we complete the current Q400 COCKPIT and TRAINING projects for the P3D platform.  This however does not mean that work has not begun on the MSFS platform, just at a slower pace, as there is quite a bit that will need to be done before we can consider our projects MSFS 2020 ready.

Rome was not built in a day, nor was the new simulator platform, so in time this too may or shall come to pass.

 

Cheers

 

Edited August 20, 2021 by crosswind