25 minutes ago, pmplayer said:

Maybe in another year..😜

cheers 😉

yeap 😉 

1 hour ago, Mike S KPDX said:

wow, I kinda of forgot.  after flying the bus for the last 3-4 years, seeing these images just hammers home just how dated this thing is.  looks like it walked out of 1969.  I am going to have to spend some time looking some of boeing newest stuff, they have to move on from this sooner or later.

Even in the sim world I'm not a huge fan of the 737. I love the T7 and others but the 73 is just...past its sell-by date? I prefer the Airbus A320 family even in the sim world haha. 

2 hours ago, Lucas Gomes said:

The Head Up Display control panel is missing. It will be a disappointment compared to NGXu if it doesn't have HUD on final release.

May just not be selected as an option on these screenshots.

 

1 hour ago, liamp51 said:

Even in the sim world I'm not a huge fan of the 737. I love the T7 and others but the 73 is just...past its sell-by date? I prefer the Airbus A320 family even in the sim world haha. 

Interesting. I like the 737 for exactly that reason. It's sort of the perfect mix of modern automation and the tech from when airliners were more of a handful to fly. I just flew the FSL A321 for a few days in P3D and today the NGXu and the 737 is just more fun to fly, personally speaking. I enjoy the Airbus but it sometimes borders on a little boring for me.

Why can't asobo make their default airliners, Flyable.... I mean the 747 and a 787 at least.. Only  the A320 is sort of flyable.

When it flies bout 30K or something, it goes haywire..

 

The captian sim 777 is also broken it cannot work with ATP (the Trasnponder) doesn't work/.

 

The PMDG  taking their own sweet time... They have to go from 737 to 747 and 777 BTW all that comes out it would be 2-3 years.

 

So far the only thing flyable is the A330 which is decent. flyable...

Edited December 9, 20214 yr by Manny

45 minutes ago, Manny said:

I mean the 747 and a 787 at least..

Working Title will be working on the 747 and 787 next year.

11 hours ago, Alaska738 said:

Give me my 737. 

Right? This is going to simply amazing, their best work to date 100%, visually at least. If they could do 787 that would be prime, or if they allowed some of their resources to work alongside WT on the stock 787 as they're now "partners" of Asobo, that would work too. 

I’m really excited for the 737… but my hearts really on the 757 if that becomes a thing….which sounds like is. But I’d say 2023 minimum for that one. 

Edited December 10, 20214 yr by Ridvan Celik

8 hours ago, Manny said:

Why can't asobo make their default airliners, Flyable.... I mean the 747 and a 787 at least.

I swear sometimes it seems like some people here are using some other simulator besides MSFS.  Why can't you the 787?  I fly it nearly every day using LNAV/VNAV to all types of approaches and to be straight it's not a lot different than flying any other Boeing including the vaunted NGX.  In fact, assigning my old Cessna Trim Wheel as a ground steering tiller is nearly identical to the NGXu.  I do use the Heavy Division mod for added functionality but even the OEM one flew just dandy but with a bit less functionality.   

Here we go flying out of CYVR yesterday, marveling at how it all works so very well, with incredibly good performance:

And into KSFO earlier today:

8 hours ago, Noel said:

I swear sometimes it seems like some people here are using some other simulator besides MSFS.  Why can't you the 787?  I fly it nearly every day using LNAV/VNAV to all types of approaches and to be straight it's not a lot different than flying any other Boeing including the vaunted NGX.  In fact, assigning my old Cessna Trim Wheel as a ground steering tiller is nearly identical to the NGXu.  I do use the Heavy Division mod for added functionality but even the OEM one flew just dandy but with a bit less functionality.   

 

Did you fly above 40K feet?

 

Yes, I do, was that not supposed to be possible?  I'm at 41K feet right now otw from KDEN >KIAD.  If you mean why doesn't Asobo make perfectly accurate airliners then absolutely who could argue with that.

8 hours ago, Noel said:

I swear sometimes it seems like some people here are using some other simulator besides MSFS.  Why can't you the 787?

True. No idea why folks keep complaining about the 787. Install the mod, and you're pretty much good to go.

Ricardo, I asked this on Discord and was told by someone their mod does in fact support manual elevator trim control, but the same control I use for the TBM and Citation L have no effect in the 787-10, which led me to believe it's being 'auto-trimmed'.  Are you able to manually adjust elevator trim?

10 hours ago, Drumcode said:

Right? This is going to simply amazing, their best work to date 100%, visually at least. If they could do 787 that would be prime, or if they allowed some of their resources to work alongside WT on the stock 787 as they're now "partners" of Asobo, that would work too. 

That would be great but it seems to me that quality wings is working on it?

18 hours ago, threegreen said:

May just not be selected as an option on these screenshots.

 

Interesting. I like the 737 for exactly that reason. It's sort of the perfect mix of modern automation and the tech from when airliners were more of a handful to fly. I just flew the FSL A321 for a few days in P3D and today the NGXu and the 737 is just more fun to fly, personally speaking. I enjoy the Airbus but it sometimes borders on a little boring for me.

I agree, seems like the Airbus just flies itself, not much to do but look out the window. 

1 hour ago, Noel said:

If you mean why doesn't Asobo make perfectly accurate airliners then absolutely who could argue with that.

At least on that point, Jorg answered that question in possibly the first ever Q&A they did. They never intended to do study-level aircraft -- a corporate decision -- to leave it up to the well-established third-party community.