January 4, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, greggerm said: A famous example of a "tight fit" (C-17 at Peter O. Knight Field after its mistaken landing nine years ago...)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=805M1svwp_8 This is little bit different. This an accident. I was referring for normal ops. Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASELMy System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSDPut my hands on (pic/dual/given)7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22
January 4, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Krakin said: So you're knocking the sim because you have some skill? Have you visited the Kodiak threads recently? Because I see a lot of folks in there asking for help with flying the thing since it's characteristics are so realistic. I definitely agree about the Kodiak. It's been my most crashed plane so far. As for game vs sim; the hall sensors in my Cessna joystick seem to be playing up and the clamps keep coming off the wooden desk in the cockpit. Plus I also only seem to have one windscreen, the visibility has a tendency to drop to zero but comes back when I give the Cessna cockpit mouse a shake. Currently circumnavigating the world in a mix of Cessna and Piper aircraft. My Default Setup; MSFS, Honeycomb Alpha, Thrustmaster Hotas X, TrackIR, Samsung Galaxy Tab, JustFlight Piper Arrow. Simworks Quest Kodiak 100. Wishlist; Honeycomb Bravo, Honeycomb Charlie. 1:400 Airline Model Collector.
January 4, 20224 yr 15 minutes ago, Maxis said: Please let me know when you guys have that Area fixed and ill get it at that point. Thanks Ditto! Chris Camp
January 4, 20224 yr 50 minutes ago, Steve Dra said: A piece of software that attempts to replicate real world activities can be as realistic as the person operating it desires. You beat me to it. Any sim/game/whatever is what you make of it. Edited January 4, 20224 yr by regis9 Dave Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 5090, 55" Samsung Q80T, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU
January 4, 20224 yr With the way the world is now , a little escape from reality for me is very helpful . I enjoyed the heck out of that video .
January 4, 20224 yr 3 hours ago, Lange_666 said: Now turn it around and take off again... That's what slew is for. 🙃 ns AMD RYZEN 9 5900X 12 CORE CPU - ZOTAC RTX 3060Ti GPU - NZXT H510i ELITE CASE - EVO M.2 970 500GB DRIVE - 32GB XTREEM 4000 MEM - XPG GOLD 80+ 650 WATT PS - NZXT 280 HYBRID COOLER
January 4, 20224 yr So, a sim is not meant to replace real life. I have flown MANY real life Level D training sims. Full motion sims, no motion sims. You can screw around in them too. You can fly under a bridge. You can try wild short landings. Sometimes it works out. Sims are meant to help you with procedures, flows, and in the case of MSFS, its fun! Its fun to take in the scenery, and operate aircraft in as realistic a way as is possible. Will it feel like the real deal? No... there is no feeling at all. But it sure is fun, and for me personally can come in handy when I want to practice an instrument flight or otherwise before I try it in real life.
January 4, 20224 yr MSFS is what you do with it. And it's something we should celebrate. Gamers, young simmers, old simmers, hard core simmers, coders, designers, developpers, multiplayers, solo players... the list is long. Edited January 4, 20224 yr by vbazillio Vincent B. Check my free MSFS sceneries : https://flightsim.to/profile/vbazillio/trending and my hardware configuration.
January 4, 20224 yr Sims are meant to be fun. If you believe it's real life you need help! 9800X3D | 5080 | 32GB | 2TB NVME | Dell Ultrasharp U3415W 34" | 3440 x 1440 60Hz
January 4, 20224 yr Author 2 hours ago, Rudiii said: I much prefer the above Serious Simulators which are specifically designed to be Serious Simulators where no one has ever done anything that isn't in the realm of a Serious Simulator. Yeah, in fact I wrote in the past that IMHO all of them are just computer games. Calling them simulators looks like an attempt to justify to our wives (and ourselves) why, at 40+ yo we are still gaming 🙂 1 hour ago, Steve Dra said: A piece of software that attempts to replicate real world activities can be as realistic as the person operating it desires. 1 hour ago, sd_flyer said: Actually it's common thing with many small airports. Big jet can land but unable to take off! I doubt that a 747 can stop in 650 m... also, wasn't it supposed to stall and fall into the water at less than 100 knots? Instead it continued to climb for many seconds between 100 and 90 knots (look between 0:37 and 0:45). Come on, I am not saying I expect MSFS to be a real simulator, but certain basic numeric parameters of the flight model should be respected. 7800X3D | 2x32 GB DDR5-6000 CL32 | RTX 5080 | Alienware OLED 34" | 1 Gbps fiber
January 4, 20224 yr 6 minutes ago, MrFuzzy said: Yeah, in fact I wrote in the past that IMHO all of them are just computer games. Calling them simulators looks like an attempt to justify to our wives (and ourselves) why, at 40+ yo we are still gaming 🙂 So VERY TRUE ! Justify to ourselves actually... Just imagine me now playing ww2 air combat... How realistic / useful ... That being said, some good years ago I recorded a landing of the PMDG 747 @ LPCS rw 35 🙂 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ermIWKskJQQ Edited January 4, 20224 yr by Anatoli-Kagari9 Flying gliders since 1980 Flightsimming since 1992 AMD Ryzen 5600x, 32GB RAM, GPU Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti 8 GB, 1 TB and 500 GB nvme2 SSD drives, HP 27" 60Hz LED monitor @ 1920x1080, T16000, Hotas from old X52 Pro, Saitek Combat Rudder Pro (2010 model)
January 4, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, MrFuzzy said: I doubt that a 747 can stop in 650 m... also, wasn't it supposed to stall and fall into the water at less than 100 knots? Instead it continued to climb for many seconds between 100 and 90 knots (look between 0:37 and 0:45). Yep, I noticed that, too. Then again, you can't expect faithful systems in a default model of any simulator. I remember that the default 737 in FSX used about twice as much fuel than the real airplane, and when I tried the default 737 in X-Plane many years ago, it felt more like a Cessna. Having said that, you now can get great aircraft for both of these simulators. More choice will come to MSFS as well. For now, just enjoy how difficult it is to start the engines of the PMDG DC-6 in cold weather. They really simulate that the oil gets thicker etc. 🙂 Peter
January 4, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, Rudiii said: I much prefer the above Serious Simulators which are specifically designed to be Serious Simulators Don't kid yourself. X-plane feel and mechanics are still a game compared to RL or "serious" sims... Edited January 4, 20224 yr by DylanM
January 4, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, DylanM said: Don't kid yourself. X-plane feel and mechanics are still a game compared to RL or "serious" sims... I am kidding. Not sure about kidding myself, however. Currently circumnavigating the world in a mix of Cessna and Piper aircraft. My Default Setup; MSFS, Honeycomb Alpha, Thrustmaster Hotas X, TrackIR, Samsung Galaxy Tab, JustFlight Piper Arrow. Simworks Quest Kodiak 100. Wishlist; Honeycomb Bravo, Honeycomb Charlie. 1:400 Airline Model Collector.
January 4, 20224 yr 40 minutes ago, jpe828 said: So, a sim is not meant to replace real life. I have flown MANY real life Level D training sims. Full motion sims, no motion sims. You can screw around in them too. You can fly under a bridge. You can try wild short landings. Sometimes it works out. Sims are meant to help you with procedures, flows, and in the case of MSFS, its fun! Its fun to take in the scenery, and operate aircraft in as realistic a way as is possible. Will it feel like the real deal? No... there is no feeling at all. But it sure is fun, and for me personally can come in handy when I want to practice an instrument flight or otherwise before I try it in real life. How dare you? I have flown the FWB A320 numerous times and i am adding plane captain to my LinkedIn curriculum! Jokes aside, you are absolutely right. Chock 1.1: "The only thing that whines louder than a jet engine is a flight simmer."
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.