January 15, 20224 yr a) Is it systems-wise as deep as PMDG? I know that's a pretty general question, but I think anyone who has both can answer that. I am happy with a generel "yes, absolutely" or "no, rather like Aerosoft/QualityWings". b) Does it have random failures like PMDG or FSL or Leonardo? I often set random failures on every other flight (setting: 1 failure in 10 hours). And does it have as many failures as PMDG? c) Does it have (working) panel states like PMDG or FSL or Leonardo? (= saving panel state with all button/switch/dialer positions and aircraft fluids etc.) It's really important for me to have a reason to do the complete checklist, not knowing that every switch will always be in the right position. d) If c) = yes, does it also save the engine oil and hyd fluid amount? For transparency: I'm a community mentor at the BATC discord. However, I do not get paid for it in any way.
January 15, 20224 yr a) Yes, but overall feeling is it lacks some "organic feel" to the system like the new PMDG things. On some system it did better than PMDG, even including few maintenance part.
January 16, 20224 yr Author Anyone else for b) to d)? For transparency: I'm a community mentor at the BATC discord. However, I do not get paid for it in any way.
January 16, 20224 yr I don’t use systems failures or save panel states so I can’t answer there but it does have a state of last exit. Systems wise it is every bit as accurate as NGXu. I catch myself for a second forgetting which one I’m using. IMO graphics and performance has a very slight edge. My only issue is the spool time and throttle response is too sensitive in IFly. Vic green
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.