April 22, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, ShawnG said: Which would make the PMDG 737 the most expensive add on in mainstream consumer sim history. once you add up the variants. Good thing I only care for the 737 and 738 I guess. 😄 Happy with MSFS 🙂 home simming evolved
April 22, 20224 yr 11 minutes ago, tweekz said: Good thing I only care for the 737 and 738 I guess. 😄 well if his estimate at 70-90 per variant ends up being true, you're still in the 140-180 range... I also maintain a healthy degree of certainty that the number of people on this forum who are going to buy MORE than one or two variants is far greater than the number of people on this forum who are SAYING they are only buying one or two variants to make a forum point. And those two groups will have a lot of overlap.
April 22, 20224 yr 30 minutes ago, ShawnG said: well if his estimate at 70-90 per variant ends up being true, you're still in the 140-180 range... Did PMDG rule out a tiered pricing structure? In other words, $60 for the first variant, then $20 for each additional one. To me this would make the most sense. Gary i9-13900K, Asus RTX 4080, Asus Z790 Plus Wi-Fi, 32 GB Ram, Seasonic GX-1000W, LG C1 48” OLED 4K monitor, Quest 3 VR
April 22, 20224 yr No interest in the 146. Of the others, whichever ships first. James David Walley Ryzen 7 7700X, 32 GB, RTX 3080
April 23, 20224 yr The 737 is an instant buy. Probably not the MD and definitely not the 146. The MD was pretty cool and all, but it just not for me. The 146 on the other hand, looked kind of neat but really wasn't anything special. There's a reason why only 370 or so were made. i7-13700KF, 32gb DDR4 3200, RTX 4080, Win 11, MSFS 2024
April 23, 20224 yr 6 hours ago, Gilandred said: Did PMDG rule out a tiered pricing structure? In other words, $60 for the first variant, then $20 for each additional one. To me this would make the most sense. They haven't said anything at all about pricing structure, other than a few vague statements. everything we have been discussing is conjecture. And you are correct about that pricing structure making sense, unless you are PMDG and you have to manage that across a bunch of different vendors selling the product, and the support requests thereof. Which isn't impossible, but it is something to consider, Also, they have never been anything other than a high-end developer in quality or price. mostly deserved except a few incidents. They will do what they will do. But I'm highly skeptical about anything I've heard here about them having seen the light about high volume sales and lower pricing unless I see it. I believe the previous poster will ultimately be correct. 70-90 average per variant. it'll be expensive as hell. it'll be broken up over a number of months which will make it seem less so, and if you only want a partial experience, you might do ok, but still...
April 23, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, Dave_YVR said: The 146 on the other hand, looked kind of neat but really wasn't anything special. I disagree, this plane is quirky or simply bizarre, that's why it will be a lot of fun to fly it. 3D model, texture, cockpit, systems, sounds seems really well done. We just need more info on the FMS.
April 23, 20224 yr tbh I'm just happy flying this FBW A32NX around at the moment (plus the Headwind 330). I like the airbuses right now. might look at this Fenix one that you all speak of. Owned the PMDG's right back to FS9 but might wait awhile this time round for the 900 and the max. With two kids under 10, my sim time is very limited (400-500nm flights) as it stands let alone trying to decide which plane I want to use on a given day. Edited April 23, 20224 yr by flyhalf Regards, Max (YSSY) i7-12700K | Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB 3600MHz DDR4 | Gigabyte RTX4090 24Gb | Gigabyte Z690 AORUS ELITE DDR4 | Corsair HX1200 PSU
April 23, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, Dave_YVR said: The 146 on the other hand, looked kind of neat but really wasn't anything special. There's a reason why only 370 or so were made. There are all sorts of boring, valid business related reasons that some really interesting aircraft weren't successful in the real world. But that's what's great about flight sim, the bean counters don't determine what you can fly. A 146 interests me way more than a lot of modern, highly computerized fuel efficient tubes with wings. Had a lot of fun with the QW Avro versions in sims past, hopefully they will be forthcoming as well.
April 24, 20224 yr "A 146 interests me way more than a lot of modern, highly computerized fuel efficient tubes with wings." The 146 is a lot of work, That's why I find myself flying the CRJ less and less. Too much attention I have to pay. For people who like to be that active with the aircraft Then Its for you. I like to enjoy the sim and sceneries. And if I want to be that involved then I can with the 747NG too. IF I don't want to I have that fun factor. Manny Beta tester for SIMStarter
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.