EMBRAER PHENOM 300E released

[mtr75 653]

45 minutes ago, ryanbatc said:

I think it won't show the weird flight path if all you are doing is flying a straight-ish line.  It should work (well aside from the active leg issue which always happens to me) if the IAF is almost directly in front of you.

But notice I got the exact same weird arc that you did, which I hadn’t seen before. 

[himmelhorse 1,276]

Hello all,

For those who are unaware, I notice that FSElite has Dev Ouroboros featuring a new Phenom100 in development with a Phenom 300 to follow. 

I don't know if this is the right page to bring this up, but it is, I think great news for the community wanting some biz jets.

Regards

Tony

[ryanbatc 12,846]

30 minutes ago, himmelhorse said:

Hello all,

For those who are unaware, I notice that FSElite has Dev Ouroboros featuring a new Phenom100 in development with a Phenom 300 to follow. 

I don't know if this is the right page to bring this up, but it is, I think great news for the community wanting some biz jets.

Regards

Tony

I think it's right on subject I also read this today.  Basically just having a little jet to fly around in with g1000 nxi would be great.

[Gaiiden 98]

2 hours ago, himmelhorse said:

For those who are unaware, I notice that FSElite has Dev Ouroboros featuring a new Phenom100 in development with a Phenom 300 to follow. 

freeware waaat? Looks gorgeous. Will def donate if it turns out gud

[mtr75 653]

On 4/28/2022 at 3:20 PM, ryanbatc said:

I think it won't show the weird flight path if all you are doing is flying a straight-ish line.  It should work (well aside from the active leg issue which always happens to me) if the IAF is almost directly in front of you.

So I’ve basically figured out what this is. In my case, my SimBrief flight plan ended at a VOR on the field and then added the RNAV approach after that. So basically per the sim’s brain it had to get to the VOR on the field and then from essentially the field back to the IAF to start the approach. And it just can’t figure out how to do that. Same with you, starting and ending at the same place with an RNAV approach in the middle. 

Usually when SimBrief makes a suggestion like that (a final flight plan fix very near the destination, usually a VOR on the field) I remove the final fix and insert an approach. That way the flight plan doesn’t double back, as it were. This time I left it. And as I briefed the approach I realized what I should have realized earlier, which is that I didn’t need that last fix. So I removed it from the G3000. Only at that point, I was on the leg to that VOR. So when I removed it the G3000 just went haywire. 

So while this is clearly an issue in the sim, this is the first time I’ve seen it, and if I properly lay out the flight plan in the G3000 it can be easily avoided. 

Edited April 30, 2022 by mtr75

[ryanbatc 12,846]

That might be the other side of things - I never build a flight plan other than in the sim itself.  It seems to do better when importing a MSFS flight plan or using the flight planner screen before you fly.  

[blueshark747 1,843]

On 4/30/2022 at 10:16 AM, ryanbatc said:

That might be the other side of things - I never build a flight plan other than in the sim itself.  It seems to do better when importing a MSFS flight plan or using the flight planner screen before you fly.  

A bit off topic but did you see what else is coming?

https://fselite.net/content/a-freeware-bombardier-challenger-300-is-in-development-for-msfs/

[ryanbatc 12,846]

7 hours ago, blueshark747 said:

A bit off topic but did you see what else is coming?

https://fselite.net/content/a-freeware-bombardier-challenger-300-is-in-development-for-msfs/

Looks a ways off but a good start.

[Ahmad310 0]

Has anyone be successful at getting the WT G3000 to work in the Phenom 300?