FSHUD feedback ?

[Kaiii3 1,967]

Traffic Files/AIGFP -> AIGFP files it can not read yet

Traffic Files/Scenery -> BGL files it can read

[Nemo 1,305]

I am using AIG bgl traffic and FSHud recognizes it well. However, AIG ai traffic manged by FSHud is still very small in numbers. At large airports like EDDF, EGLL, KSFO etc., I'm seeing only 12-15 a/c which is much to less imo. I expect at least 40-50 a/c for a lively airport.

Edited May 22, 2022 by Nemo

[Grzegorz 11]

1 hour ago, Nemo said:

I am using AIG bgl traffic and FSHud recognizes it well. However, AIG ai traffic manged by FSHud is still very small in numbers. At large airports like EDDF, EGLL, KSFO etc., I'm seeing only 12-15 a/c which is much to less imo. I expect at least 40-50 a/c for a lively airport.

That is why I asked for a refund. The premise of the app has potential, but it's all still in the early stages.
Reducing AI to control it is not the solution many of us would probably expect. From the previews it looked like FSHud would control what is in the sim, then that makes sense and is a revolution of such an app. I achieve similar results using proatc, ATCAPI, aiflow (programs available here on the forum). Maybe there is no active AI control but it succeeds quite well separation, runway use management and all this with a high level of AI in the sim (I use 75%). 
Last test before refund decision, at EPWA I had 7 aircraft, at EGLL 18. All flight plans I have in bgl format, 99% installed by OCI.
I will let it go for now, proatc is doing a good job so far, together with other applications

[IanHarrison 521]

On 5/16/2022 at 3:39 AM, Patco Lch said:

Or RC4?

RC4 gives better instructions to finals etc. but FSHudATC controls and injects its own AI which RC4 doesn't.

[Benbo 53]

This would be a definate purchase for me once all the issues are sorted out,but at the moment im more than happy with RC4