Jump to content
jcomm

FSHUD feedback ?

Recommended Posts

Traffic Files/AIGFP -> AIGFP files it can not read yet

Traffic Files/Scenery -> BGL files it can read


AIGtechBanner_Kai_AVSIM.png

Share this post


Link to post

I am using AIG bgl traffic and FSHud recognizes it well. However, AIG ai traffic manged by FSHud is still very small in numbers. At large airports like EDDF, EGLL, KSFO etc., I'm seeing only 12-15 a/c which is much to less imo. I expect at least 40-50 a/c for a lively airport.

Edited by Nemo

- Harry 

i9-12900K (12 Cores, 16+8 Threads, max 5.2 GHz, Aorus X 360 AIO H20, ASUS Z690 ROG Strix F), 32 GB RAM (DDR5 5200, CAS 38), RTX 3090 (Alpacool Eiswolf 360 AIO H2O).  Windows 11 Pro (1TB M.2 SSD C drive).  MSFS 2020 (MS Store, installed on C, MSFS Content on seperate 2TB M.2 SSD).   P3Dv5.3 (1TB M.2 SSD).

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, Nemo said:

I am using AIG bgl traffic and FSHud recognizes it well. However, AIG ai traffic manged by FSHud is still very small in numbers. At large airports like EDDF, EGLL, KSFO etc., I'm seeing only 12-15 a/c which is much to less imo. I expect at least 40-50 a/c for a lively airport.

That is why I asked for a refund. The premise of the app has potential, but it's all still in the early stages.
Reducing AI to control it is not the solution many of us would probably expect. From the previews it looked like FSHud would control what is in the sim, then that makes sense and is a revolution of such an app. I achieve similar results using proatc, ATCAPI, aiflow (programs available here on the forum). Maybe there is no active AI control but it succeeds quite well separation, runway use management and all this with a high level of AI in the sim (I use 75%). 
Last test before refund decision, at EPWA I had 7 aircraft, at EGLL 18. All flight plans I have in bgl format, 99% installed by OCI.
I will let it go for now, proatc is doing a good job so far, together with other applications

Share this post


Link to post
On 5/16/2022 at 3:39 AM, Patco Lch said:

Or RC4?

RC4 gives better instructions to finals etc. but FSHudATC controls and injects its own AI which RC4 doesn't.


Intel i7 6700K @4.3. 32gb Gskill 3200 RAM. Z170x Gigabyte m/b. 28" LG HD monitor. Win 10 Home. 500g Samsung 960 as Windows home. 1 Gb Mushkin SSD for P3D. GTX 1080 8gb.

Share this post


Link to post

This would be a definate purchase for me once all the issues are sorted out,but at the moment im more than happy with RC4

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...