M600

26 minutes ago, Greazer said:

M600

Simbol is doing that apparently....and if it's as in depth as his Sting it should be really lovely.

Since no one seems to be looking on their website:

Golden Eagle

Piper Malibu

Piper Saratoga (since the twin variant is already released by them)

390 Premier

Hawker H25B

Edited September 3, 20223 yr by Dillon

10 hours ago, JacquesBrel said:

A better PC12.

Agree - bring on SWS.  This aircraft is a nightmare to paint without a model LOD00.  Why do they do that??

2 hours ago, ryanbatc said:

Simbol is doing that apparently....and if it's as in depth as his Sting it should be really lovely.

I think it will be a M500, close enough!

1 minute ago, Greazer said:

I think it will be a M500, close enough!

He said he also is doing the 600...probably a few years away though.

None.

2 hours ago, Dillon said:

Since no one seems to be looking on their website:

Golden Eagle

Piper Malibu

Piper Saratoga (since the twin variant is already released by them)

390 Premier

Hawker H25B

absolutely the Saratoga - In using MSFS most of the time I miss this baby - and don't really want to waste my time

back in P3D -  and I used to own its predecessor the early PA32 300 in the 70s 

i also endorse the earlier request for the Aero Commander - and would add the PA 31 T Chieftain - and the

B/jet Dassault F50

 

The Embraer 120. Carenado did a decent job on the one for P3D

13 hours ago, V1ROTA7E said:

Not a huge fan of Carenado....but, in X Plane their planes weren't bad.

Carenado did models and textures, and a third party did systems and flight dynamics for X-Plane. 

We know they can do better (V35B and Mooney).

I loved the PA-23 apache in FSX, and the Navajo.  They (Carenado) are a bit hit and miss, but I have been happy with the V53B, the C337, Seneca and Mooney.
Maybe people should give them a chance to fix up the PC-12 first, like other devs seem to get the chance to fix up their imperfect products.
The technicalities aside, as mentioned by Bert, I find I can actually still enjoy the aircraft in the sim, and it will be better with the few technical issues fixed up and a bit better short field performance.

I stopped buying Careno aircraft a while ago and cannot see myself pickping up that habit again.

 

 

Edited September 3, 20223 yr by darshonaut

3 hours ago, bobcat999 said:

I loved the PA-23 apache in FSX, and the Navajo.  They (Carenado) are a bit hit and miss, but I have been happy with the V53B, the C337, Seneca and Mooney.
 

These are the four I have and I enjoy them all.

17 hours ago, Stoopy said:

I would like to see a Carenado Beech D18S that can be trimmed to fly hands off reasonably straight and level for more than a few minutes like any normal aircraft without slowly pitching up farther and farther into a very high AOA and deep stall or pitching down more and more until it just lawn darts into the ground.

I can get the Boeing 247 to track perfectly hands off no autopilot long enough to take the trash out or do other bidding as demanded by my domestic overlord but flying the '18 is an exercise in constantly chasing some Twilight Zone airplane gremlin having his way defiling the elevator trim control cables. 

Let me ask,how much total time do you have in either plane in real life? The Beech 18 is a handful to fly IRL. 

8 minutes ago, Donka said:

These are the four I have and I enjoy them all.

Sure.  All good.  Obviously I meant V35 above not V53 , but you got it, and the V35 is one of my favourites at the moment.  I just wish it had a tip tank model!  

I just took the PC-12 for a flight again around the Canary Islands, and while I accept it needs the work mentioned, it really isn't that bad. 
I am not getting the Beech 18 sounds, or the lack of performance.  I am on SU10 beta though, so I think there is a performance fix for certain gauges in there.
As someone else said, it is also fully loaded by default.  Half baggage (200lb) and removal of two of the six passengers, and it is much better.