Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Guest

Engine start order in 744 versus 742 -why different?

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,I recently noticed that the engine start sequence for the Boeing 747-400 is engine 4, then 3,2,1 in that order. However, in the 742 Ready for Pushback which I use, it is 4,1,2,3 which to me makes more sense. The way I understand it, starting two engines in symmetrical positions on the wings will distribute the sudden backlash of thrust force evenly on the airframe and gears, thereby reducing any tendency for the plane to suddenly move sideways (or any chance of it in any case). Can anyone with a type rating on the 744/742 comment on this difference in the engine startup order?Thank-you in advance,John


I love flying my "iddy biddy Jumbo"

 

CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400, socket 775/3GHz/1333MHz bus/6MB cache

MOBO: Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP@n/Intel X38 chipset

RAM: 4GB Kingston HyperX 1333MHz. rated 7-7-7-20, matched pair (2 x 2GB)

GRAPHICS: Sapphire Radeon 5770HD 1GB (w/ fan)

MONITOR: Samsung 24", 2494HM LCD wide-screen 1920x1080

SOUND: SoundBlaster Audigy 2 ZS

HARD DRIVES: 1xWestern Digital WD1600JD SATA 160GB (primary/Windows XP and system boot drive)

1xWestern Digital WD3200AAJS SATA2 320GB (secondary/Flight Simulator 2004 running off WinXP Pro 32-bit, games video editing drive)

1xWestern Digital 500GB Black series SATA2 (Windows 7 64-bit: FSX is running off Win7; Windows XP Professional 32-bit)

CASE: Antec Sonata III 500W

OS: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit for FSX; Windows XP Pro 32-bit for other things.

Share this post


Link to post

Sorry i don't have T/R but I think start procedures are largely airline specific. The one example I can think of that doesn't follow either of your procedures is DLH. Saw a video of them going through a start on http://www.a340.net/ and they do 4&3 together and then 2&1 the same way. I wouldn't think that any start order would have a tendency to move or stress anything on a 74x. Jay EklundCAT VI Senior Captain KDENhttp://online.vatsimindicators.net/812321/764.png


Jay EKlund

UVA/GCVA Pile-it

Share this post


Link to post

And in our E-3, the engine start order is 3,4,2,1.Jeff


Jeff

Commercial | Instrument | Multi-Engine Land

Share this post


Link to post

On the 747, hydraulic system #4 is the supply for normal brakes. This is why #4 is started first and the remainder of the start sequence is airline specific.As for the starting of 2 engines at a time, there's no limitation. The airframe can more than handle 2 engines on one side at idle power. Think of it this way, the 744 can sustain flight and land with 2 engines out on one side without adverse effects to the airframe.Cheers,JohnBoeing 727/737 & Lockheed C-130/L-100 Mechanichttp://www.sstsim.com/images/team/JR.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Guest

well, if the bleed air system can't provide enough to start two engines at once that would be a limitation :)Would be equipment specific of course.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
  • Donation Goals

    AVSIM's 2020 Fundraising Goal

    Donate to our annual general fundraising goal. This donation keeps our doors open and providing you service 24 x 7 x 365. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. We reset this goal every new year for the following year's goal.


    50%
    $12,670.00 of $25,000.00 Donate Now
×
×
  • Create New...