Anyone have experience with this one?

[Kaboki 437]

justflight.com
https://www.justflight.com › product
WB-Sim 172SP Classic Enhancement - Just Flight

 

Im looking for something to scratch that A2A itch and came over this product. Is it any good?

 

 

[Noel 4,499]

Not sure but do you have experience with the other one?

[edzunu 29]

WB-Sim 172SP Classic Enhancement is very nice addon, you can manage engine faults, oil refill, etc....and save states.

[regis9 4,014]

I like it…it’s now my go to for “realistic” low and slow GA flying.  Fun to know if you do something wrong you could pay the consequences 😀

[Kaboki 437]

15 minutes ago, Noel said:

Not sure but do you have experience with the other one?

Wich other one?

[s0cks 116]

1 hour ago, regis9 said:

I like it…it’s now my go to for “realistic” low and slow GA flying.  Fun to know if you do something wrong you could pay the consequences 😀

Does it improve the interactivity of the aircraft model? In other words, do the doors open?

[Kaboki 437]

Not much feedback, but the few that gave didn't say anything negative so I decided too go for it. But the Justflight store doesnt work for me, get error in the payment screen. Is this thing sold elsewhere that might work for me..?

Anyway, thank you all for the feedback, except the mocking one, was that really neccesary?

[orchestra_nl 930]

You probably know this already but this addon only works if you have the deluxe / premium version of MSFS.

Your post triggered me to watch some youtube reviews on this and they seem generally to be favourable. There might be better GA out there but if you want a 172.this is the best (and only) addon to get.

I've read nothing about whether or not the developer has improved the flightmodel, but the default flight model was already quite good so it might not need any update.

[Johnny Wyatt 152]

Next time better to write an informative title, instead of "this one" you write "with WB-Sim 172SP Classic Enhancement from Just Flight".

Respect your readers.

[Kaboki 437]

1 hour ago, Johnny Wyatt said:

Next time better to write an informative title, instead of "this one" you write "with WB-Sim 172SP Classic Enhancement from Just Flight".

Respect your readers.

Yeah, maybe also respect that not all of us is british or americans so its not always easy to articulate myself in a foreign language. Strange though that most people understood what I ment except you and that other guy....

[Kaboki 437]

2 hours ago, orchestra_nl said:

You probably know this already but this addon only works if you have the deluxe / premium version of MSFS.

Your post triggered me to watch some youtube reviews on this and they seem generally to be favourable. There might be better GA out there but if you want a 172.this is the best (and only) addon to get.

I've read nothing about whether or not the developer has improved the flightmodel, but the default flight model was already quite good so it might not need any update.

Thanks, yeah Im aware of the deluxe/premium requirement. To bad I cant buy it though:(

[Noel 4,499]

1 minute ago, Kaboki said:

Strange though that most people understood what I ment except you and that other guy....

No one understood what you meant until they opened the cryptic title.  That's all and you were given good advice on how to let people who actually can respond by incorporating a little more information in the title.  Has nothing to do with being American or British as you very well know.

[Bert Pieke 7,585]

7 minutes ago, Kaboki said:

To bad I cant buy it though:(

Have you tried this one?  Adds some ooomph to the C172.. nice 🙂

https://flightsim.to/file/42097/rf172-reims-rocket-cessna-r172-hawk-xp-ii

[Kaboki 437]

53 minutes ago, Noel said:

No one understood what you meant until they opened the cryptic title.  That's all and you were given good advice on how to let people who actually can respond by incorporating a little more information in the title.  Has nothing to do with being American or British as you very well know.

Whatever, wasnt aware of any laws howto create a topic title. Now that the forum police have corrected me Im sure I'll get it right next time....

[Kaboki 437]

52 minutes ago, Bert Pieke said:

Have you tried this one?  Adds some ooomph to the C172.. nice 🙂

https://flightsim.to/file/42097/rf172-reims-rocket-cessna-r172-hawk-xp-ii

No, havent tried that one(do i need to specify wich one,Noel?). Not really what im looking for. But thanks for the tip:)