Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
styckx

With the exodus of freeware developers from FlightSim.To

Recommended Posts

Just now, Matchstick said:

Right, so you have no evidence and you admit at least one of your points is a pure "conspiracy theory".

*Plonk*

And that triggers you why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Soulflight said:

The freeware market is exactly not a market and shouldnt create competition.  

Why ? Competition is good even if there is no market involved !

14 minutes ago, Soulflight said:

 

  Experience with other platforms* tells me that this is usually the result of a professional marketing concept being applied. UT all the nice functions of flightsim.to can be part of the strategy to get more donations from people than whats actually needed to cover their expenses.  

Then what ? Whats is wrong about getting a few bucks extra ? Good for them, I'd say.

  • Like 2

Dominique

Simming since 1981 -  4770k@3.7 GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was an extreme example once where someone was selling a modified FSX stuffed with freeware addons claiming its a new sim. I forgot the name of it but maybe others remember. Not everyone will agree to the idea of someone else making money with their freeware work.

"Evidence that flightsim.to is profit oriented blablabla plonk":

The "about" section of their website states:
"Who Runs It?
No company. No investor. Flightsim.to is run by a handful of enthusiasts of the flight simulation community - just like you!"

However, under "Legal Contact", you can see flightsim.to is definitely declared as a business in germany with a sales tax ID number. The owner of the website stated an adress in hamburg which you can look up in google street view and shows an office building.

Again, i am visiting flightsim.to as often as i visit avsim. But i dont get why people get massively angry as soon as i state that flightsim.to could be profit oriented? They are openly reselling payware addons and getting a share with it, which probably is why their website looks so professional.

If you are fine with it, be fine with it. As long as they are respecting freeware as freeware, i am also fine with it. But: if avsim is a 100% free time project, asking them to compete with commercially run services isnt exactly fair.

 

 

Edited by Soulflight
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dominique_K said:

Why ? Competition is good even if there is no market involved !

Then what ? Whats is wrong about getting a few bucks extra ? Good for them, I'd say.

I don't think the issue is someone earning a few bucks because there is a bit leftover from donations after the bills have been paid. The website looks professionally done and if they are just enthousiasts as they say they have done a marvellous job.

They started the site suggesting it is a non-profit website run by enthousiasts and this has encouraged hundreds of freeware developers to share their work via this website. I have no issue with them paying the bills by running ads or even subscriptions for premium access as long as the freeware remains accessible without subscriptions. Hopefully they earn enough from ads and premium accounts to continue to do so because they cannot suddenly switch to a paid-access-only model without betraying the trust of freeware developers who shared their work.

  • Like 1

Flightsim rig:
PC: AMD 5900x with Dark Rock Pro 4 cooler | MSI X570 MEG Unify | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo | Gigabyte Aorus Master RTX 3090 | Corsair RM850x | Fractal Define 7 XL
AV: Acer Predator x34 3440x1440 monitor | Logitech Z906 speakers
Controllers: Fulcrum One Yoke | MFG Crosswind v2 pedals | Honeycomb Bravo TQ | Stream Deck XL | TrackIR 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Dominique_K said:

Shouldn’t we be happy that some new guys out there had an idea for a decently modern user-friendly UI to pool freeware  when the old guys were still on a 20-year old UI ? Isn’t it what is called innovation ? Have they to show any credentials ? Did they corner anything by no legit means or would it be, by any chance, that they were better and thats why simmers and devs flocked to them ? 

No one is saying it isn't a decent site for freeware.  All I'm asking is the timing of it and the release of MSFS is beyond coincidental to say the least.  I've never seen anything like that.  MSFS could have been a flop like FLIGHT so pre-supposing as special site for add-ons would be a little premature.  When MSFS was launched two sites just took over out of nowhere, NEXUSMODS and Flightsim.to.  NEXUSMODS was already established and eventually fell off as a favored MOD site.  Flightsim.to became the go to site.  If Flightsim.to was already an established site like NEXUSMODS things would make sense but Flightsim.to just appeared and took over.  Basically, overnight it cornered the market for Freeware upending all other sites that's been around for over 20 years.  That's one heck of a feat...🧐

Edited by Dillon
  • Like 3

FS2020 

Alienware Aurora R11 10th Gen Intel Core i7 10700F - Windows 11 Home 32GB Ram
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB DLSS 3 - HP Reverb G2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Dillon said:

My question is how did Flightsim.to even come into existence and is now the go to place for FS Freeware?  Prior to the release of MSFS no one ever heard of the site.  Freeware for FS was released primarily here at Avsim and Flightsim.com.  This site came out of nowhere...:wacko:

This is the question I wonder about every single time I use flightsim.to.

First I thought this was a website that hosts payware stuff illegally because of the .to TLD. It took me a while to realise this is like AVSIM library but much much better.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 As none of us wants Bob's or Ray's blood pressure to rise, I will leave it here 😄 !


Dominique

Simming since 1981 -  4770k@3.7 GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are not using "Mod Manager" or other advanced features of flightsim.to, you may not understand why it is what it is (not just a file library). 

Nexusmods was/is a go-to for many games/titles but F.2 has become the premier in our hobby because of it's focus and features.

Negatively comparing F.2 finances as they were to what they are is a bit like condemning WorkingTitle for exiting the freeware market and getting paid by Microsoft/Asobo.

Of course, F.2 has to work with developers but the site is no-brainer go-to for users.

Edited by hs118
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Konterhalbe said:

This is the question I wonder about every single time I use flightsim.to.

First I thought this was a website that hosts payware stuff illegally because of the .to TLD. It took me a while to realise this is like AVSIM library but much much better.

I'd say because the site here and other popular file libraries are quite antiquated in their UI.  It was nice to see a fresh site with high res preview pics etc etc.

  • Like 4
  • Upvote 2

| FAA ZMP |
| PPL ASEL |
| Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 32GB 5600 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Flightsim.to is an excellent site for developers and consumers - well structured, illustrated and easy for updating the addons  - I hope the storm in the teacup will be soon forgotten.

  • Like 11
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, hansb57 said:

GAIST is a nice example. Nice and must be a lot of work. But 99% of the ships I only see when I open Little Nav Map and flying over water is not my favorite simming experience. What I want to do to obtain an add on is up to me, just as it is the developers choice and right to publish where and what they want.  I´m pretty sure I will not be missed by those developers and I can live without the hassle.

I cannot wait for the GAIST real time version to release.   Then we will see ships everywhere.

The average person has no idea how many ships their are,  using the Atlantic Ocean as an example there might be 4 or 5 vessels within the 50 mile radius of a vessel.

Take a look at Marine Traffic .com,   there are a staggering number of ships in the world.

https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-40.1/centery:31.1/zoom:5

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dillon said:

That's one heck of a feat...🧐

Ease of use. Modern looking UI. Large collection of content. 

 

It's not that hard to comprehend...

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bdub22 said:

Large collection of content. 

This came much later after Flightsim.to took the top spot over Avsim, Flightsim.com, NEUSMODS.  Add to that it only specializes mostly in MSFS add-ons.  Avsim I believe is still the king for the older sims.


FS2020 

Alienware Aurora R11 10th Gen Intel Core i7 10700F - Windows 11 Home 32GB Ram
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB DLSS 3 - HP Reverb G2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now we are complaining about well organized sites that give out flight sim freeware...... What next?

  • Like 6
  • Upvote 1

 

BOBSK8             MSFS 2020 ,    ,PMDG 737-600-800PMDG DC6 , A2A Comanche, Fenix A320,    Milviz C 310 ,  FSLTL  

TrackIR   Avliasoft EFB2    FSI Panel ,  ATC  by PF3  , A Pilots LIfe V2 ,  CLX PC , Auto FPS

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do people always bring up avsim.com and flightsim.com file libraries? They have not been relevant since FSX. They would buckle under a fraction of the bandwidth fs.to uses. Avsim forums can't even host images and people assume they can host terabytes worth of MSFS addons. I bet some of the mods were looking in horror as people suggested hosting files here.

Why did someone create fs.to? Maybe for the same reason freeware developers create freeware? Do they have ulterior motives when they put a "buy me a coffee" button on their page? It is an ulterior motive to try and make some money when something that started as a hobby turns into a full-time job?

  • Like 7
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...