Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Sky_Pilot071

High MSFS Clouds Are SO Good

Recommended Posts

I read these posts about low rez MSFS clouds but at the high setting at FL 280 they look SO good.  These are the best looking clouds that I've seen in any sim.   Please tell me what I am missing.  

Ok the Cirrus clouds are MIA but this post is not about that.

Cheers

sp

 

Edited by Sky_Pilot071
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The clouds are acceptable at 'high' setting, but really shine on 'ultra'. The overall weather depiction has really improved over the last year or so, so kudos to Microsoboblue for that.

I'm still hoping we get cirrus someday, though. 😇

  • Like 2

13900K | MSI RTX 4090 | 64 GB 3600 MHz | 4x SSD + 1x HDD | ASUS 42" 3840x2160 120Hz OLED
VirtualFly TQ6+ | Virpil WarBRD + Constellation Alpha | MFG Crosswind V2 | RealSimGear GNS530/430

spacer.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get that not everyone has an AMD 5900X or a 3060TI but complaining about High textures for volumetric clouds is just not happening for me.

sp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, I dunno, msfs clouds can look absolutely great sometimes, and also sometimes absolutely awful.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Sky_Pilot071 said:

I read these posts about low rez MSFS clouds but at the high setting at FL 280 they look SO good.  These are the best looking clouds that I've seen in any sim.   Please tell me what I am missing.  

Cumulonimbus clouds, Tornado clouds and Cirrus clouds.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sky_Pilot071 said:

I read these posts about low rez MSFS clouds but at the high setting at FL 280 they look SO good.  These are the best looking clouds that I've seen in any sim.   Please tell me what I am missing.  

Ok the Cirrus clouds are MIA but this post is not about that.

Cheers

sp

 

Do you ever pay close attention to clouds, and particulary at altitude? What is your locaton in the world?

 

 

Edited by fppilot

Frank Patton
MasterCase Pro H500M; MSI Z490 WiFi MOB; i7 10700k 3.8 Ghz; Gigabyte RTX 3080 12gb OC; H100i Pro liquid cooler; 32GB DDR4 3600;  Gold RMX850X PSU;
ASUS 
VG289 4K 27" Monitor; Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Crosswind 3's w/dampener.  
Former USAF meteorologist & ground weather school instructor. AOPA Member #07379126
                       
"I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." - John Deere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO the "ultra" clouds look too grey and have too much of an ash effect. "high" is the best you currently can get.

Are cirrus on the wishlist btw?

Edited by Soulflight

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, fppilot said:

Do you ever pay close attention to clouds, and particulary at altitude? What is your locaton in the world?

 

 

I fly in the Pacific Northwest and know what voxels are and these clouds definitaly don't need them.  If I have to pay any more attention to them then the really don't need help IMO.

sp

 

Edited by Sky_Pilot071
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, on high the clouds usually look excellent. Not always. And I wish for more variety. Also, I prefer to enjoy what the sim has to offer and don't examine every cloud with a microscope. 

Performance on high is also great. This is with Live Weather. I never use "presets".

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Soulflight said:

IMHO the "ultra" clouds look too grey and have too much of an ash effect. "high" is the best you currently can get.

Are cirrus on the wishlist btw?

Agree on that.

On a 55” display the ash effect shows a lot while on a 27” display it looks way better.

Also the use of DLSS 3 / balanced is not the most optimal way to see the best looking clouds. Although it depends on how high you fly over the clouds….

  • Like 1

13900 8 cores @ 5.5-5.8 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.3 GHz (hyperthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D4 - GSkill Ripjaws 2x 16 Gb 4266 mhz @ 3200 mhz / cas 13 -  Inno3D RTX4090 X3 iCHILL 24 Gb - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 1Tb - Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Thermaltake Level 10 GT case - EKWB Extreme 240 liquid cooling set push/pull - 2x 55’ Sony 4K tv's as front view and right view.

13600  6 cores @ 5.1 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz (hypterthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D - GSkill Trident 4x Gb 3200 MHz cas 15 - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16 Gb  - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 2x  Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Corsair D4000 Airflow case - NXT Krajen Z63 AIO liquide cooling - 1x 65” Sony 4K tv as left view.

FOV : 190 degrees

My flightsim vids :  https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't really tell the difference between clouds @ high and ultra. Which is lucky for me, cus Ultra clouds really tank fps. They definitely look a lot worse @ medium though.

Edited by s0cks
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Greazer said:

Cumulonimbus clouds, Tornado clouds and Cirrus clouds.

They had realistic looking cumulonimbus in the past - at least occasionally. Accurate, highly detailed cirrus (especially cirrocumulus) will probably require some kind of hybrid cloud system using textures. I don’t think it is possible to create detailed thin clouds using purely volumetric techniques.


Jim Barrett

Licensed Airframe & Powerplant Mechanic, Avionics, Electrical & Air Data Systems Specialist. Qualified on: Falcon 900, CRJ-200, Dornier 328-100, Hawker 850XP and 1000, Lear 35, 45, 55 and 60, Gulfstream IV and 550, Embraer 135, Beech Premiere and 400A, MD-80.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have my clouds set to high too and they look amazing IMO. If I set them to ultra, I do start to get frame drops with my 3070TI. Otherwise, I get a solid 60fps no matter what the cloud coverage is with them set to high.

  • Like 1

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those using high vs ultra thanks for mentioning. Using ultra almost since ever and will dial it back a notch to see whether it’ll give me some more cpu/gpu power for other stuff

  • Like 1

Phil Leaven

i5 10600KF, 32 GB 3200 RAM, MSI 3060 12GB OC, Asus ROG Z490-H, 2 WD Black NVME for each Win11 (500GB) and MSFS (1TB), MSFS Cache and Photogrammetry always disabled, Live Weather and Live Traffic always on, Res 2560x1440 on 27"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...