ATR is out

[qqwertz 781]

So many people here complain about the lack of a manual, or that the plane wasn't "expert level". You probably misunderstand what "expert level" means: it's for experts, i.e., people who don't need a manual to operate it 😉

 

[JRBarrett 3,070]

41 minutes ago, Jeeeno said:

It doesn't even have "turns" displayed on ND as far I as I saw on the streams on yt. All legs are segments tied together. It's a feature on WT aircrafts which are free... 

Big nope. 

That is how legs display on the real aircraft. 

[Jeeeno 314]

17 minutes ago, JRBarrett said:

That is how legs display on the real aircraft. 

The HSI behaviour tells different things. 

[erict 9]

Is nose steering linked to rudder?  Still can't get nose steering to work on this thing.

[Fiorentoni 4,225]

3 minutes ago, erict said:

Is nose steering linked to rudder?  Still can't get nose steering to work on this thing.

I use the nosewheelsteering axis as with any other airplane.

[Torsen 495]

3 minutes ago, erict said:

Is nose steering linked to rudder?  Still can't get nose steering to work on this thing.

working perfectly fine if you setup a "nose wheel steering axis" and use it. But the rudder will be a fallback for sure as most won't have a separate axis.

Cheers T.

[Torsen 495]

33 minutes ago, Jeeeno said:

The HSI behaviour tells different things. 

can you elaborate on that one? What exactly is not like on the real thing? I can't find a difference to the real video posted and what I see in sim. But I may be blind on a detail!?

Cheers T.

[Jeeeno 314]

3 minutes ago, Torsen said:

can you elaborate on that one? What exactly is not like on the real thing? I can't find a difference to the real video posted and what I see in sim. But I may be blind on a detail!?

Cheers T.

The HSI behaviour reflects exactly the magenta line on the ND. In the real aircraft when it reaches a waypoint and the next one is on a different course, the CDI remain centered and it smoothly start a transition between the old course and the new one. The important thing is that the CDI remain centered and that's a sign that the real aircraft indeed draws a curve between waypoints even if it doesn't seem so. 

The Asobo ATR doesn't draw curves because once you reach a waypoint, the HSI instantly goes to the new course and the CDI is not centered anymore. Behaviour not correct. 

[Torsen 495]

5 minutes ago, Jeeeno said:

The HSI behaviour reflects exactly the magenta line on the ND. In the real aircraft when it reaches a waypoint and the next one is on a different course, the CDI remain centered and it smoothly start a transition between the old course and the new one. The important thing is that the CDI remain centered and that's a sign that the real aircraft indeed draws a curve between waypoints even if it doesn't seem so. 

The Asobo ATR doesn't draw curves because once you reach a waypoint, the HSI instantly goes to the new course and the CDI is not centered anymore. Behaviour not correct. 

Ah interesting. Now I noticed what you meant. Thanks for the explanation.

Cheers T.

[erict 9]

1 hour ago, Torsen said:

working perfectly fine if you setup a "nose wheel steering axis" and use it. But the rudder will be a fallback for sure as most won't have a separate axis.

Cheers T.

Doesn't work for me. I can see the tiller moving left/right but the actual nose gear doesn't move.

In testing I unassigned "nose wheel steering axis" then all of a sudden I could turn nose wheel with rudder. Thought I was good. Didnt change anything. Start new flight ready to taxi then again nose wheel will not turn lmao.

the ns switch I leave in down default position

 

 

[Fiorentoni 4,225]

8 minutes ago, erict said:

Doesn't work for me. I can see the tiller moving left/right but the actual nose gear doesn't move.

In testing I unassigned "nose wheel steering axis" then all of a sudden I could turn nose wheel with rudder. Thought I was good. Didnt change anything. Start new flight ready to taxi then again nose wheel will not turn lmao.

the ns switch I leave in down default position

 

 

Hydraulics are on?

[WestAir 2,522]

My only concern with low quality payware is that it might stop the creation of high quality payware.

Milviz might've made a fantastic ATR if this one hadn't been made first.

[Skyseek 18]

I don’t think this is going to even come near Flight 1 ATR for FSX.  That was the best ATR in my opinion. I was disappointed that it didn’t work in Windows 10.

It cost substantially  more, but completely worth it! I have hundreds of hours flight time in that AC.

 

It sets a pretty high bar in quality and realism.

 

 

 

[kdfw__ 542]

Unfortunately the systems.cfg file is not accessible so can’t fix the cockpit lighting. I hope fixes are forthcoming.
 

But for the price it’s a good start. 

[Bobsk8 12,728]

50 minutes ago, Skyseek said:

I don’t think this is going to even come near Flight 1 ATR for FSX.  That was the best ATR in my opinion. I was disappointed that it didn’t work in Windows 10.

It cost substantially  more, but completely worth it! I have hundreds of hours flight time in that AC.

 

It sets a pretty high bar in quality and realism.

 

 

 

I wish Majestic would create the Q400 for MSFS, one of the best sim aircraft ever.