Virtualcol stop A220 developemt for MSFS

[GoranM 3,764]

Just now, Ridvan Celik said:

Well it is the MSFS forums

I'm aware.  I have MSFS, so I feel justified in being here.

1 minute ago, Ridvan Celik said:

poke the hive you get the bees. 

Not sure what you mean by that one.  I was sent a link to here by someone in our discord.  They told me we were being discussed in the MSFS forums, so I decided to see what was being said.

[bobcat999 8,479]

Watch out guys. They are coming out from under the bridge again with pointless posts about XP12 in the MSFS forum. 

Just to be clear. I won't be buying XP12 to fly an A220 that isn't built yet.

[Fiorentoni 4,224]

16 minutes ago, GoranM said:

I'm aware.  I have MSFS, so I feel justified in being here.

Not sure what you mean by that one.  I was sent a link to here by someone in our discord.  They told me we were being discussed in the MSFS forums, so I decided to see what was being said.

Why not developing for MSFS? The A220 does not have to have all the extra goodies (FBO, system monitor etc.) the CL650 has, so it's realistic and possible within the environment of MSFS (see Fenix or PMDG). With your fame and quality you'd be selling more in a month on MSFS than you've sold in the entire history of XPL. Also XPL might be as dead as P3D by the time you release for XPL, so it's also not a very future-proof platform (no judging, just looking at the exponentially dropping user numbers for XPL12)

[GoranM 3,764]

Just now, Fiorentoni said:

Why not developing for MSFS? The A220 does not have to have all the extra goodies (FBO, system monitor etc.) the CL650 has, so it's realistic and possible within the environment of MSFS (see Fenix or PMDG). With your fame and quality you'd be selling more in a month on MSFS than you've sold in the entire history of XPL. Also XPL might be as dead as P3D by the time you release for XPL, so it's also not a very future-proof platform (no judging, just looking at the exponentially dropping user numbers for XPL12)

It's impossible for me to give you a legitimate, objective response in this forum, without provoking a reaction from the obvious few in here, who love to hate on anything and everything not MSFS.  I mean, just look at the post directly above yours.  🤷‍♂️

I prefer to answer those kinds of questions in private.  

[Ray Proudfoot 8,954]

20 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said:

Why not developing for MSFS?

Because this is the XP forum. If you wish to ask that question do it in a private message.

[rick celik 1,243]

15 minutes ago, GoranM said:

It's impossible for me to give you a legitimate, objective response in this forum, without provoking a reaction from the obvious few in here, who love to hate on anything and everything not MSFS.  I mean, just look at the post directly above yours.  🤷‍♂️

I prefer to answer those kinds of questions in private.  

Honestly, from a business perspective, I don't know what you could say that will convince anyone that xp12 is a better platform to develop for in the current market. Especially an airplane that is missing from the current selection across platforms. But each to their own... you know what's best for you and your business. 

[rick celik 1,243]

3 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Because this is the XP forum. If you wish to ask that question do it in a private message.

Other way around. This is the MSFS forum.

Edited May 31, 2023 by Ridvan Celik

[Sethos 4,335]

8 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Because this is the XP forum.

No it's not.

[Alvega 2,124]

9 minutes ago, Sethos said:

No it's not.

Thought I was lost now, had to confirm I was on the MSFS forum, lol.

[GoranM 3,764]

8 minutes ago, Ridvan Celik said:

I don't know what you could say that will convince anyone that xp12 is a better platform to develop for in the current market. 

No offense, but this is why I like to address such things in private. Some people are not open to my response.  And that's fine.  To those who are interested, I'm happy to let them know.  There's already a few in here who have asked me in private.  1 of them as recently as about a month ago.  

 

[Ray Proudfoot 8,954]

1 hour ago, Ridvan Celik said:

Other way around. This is the MSFS forum.

Yep, my mistake. I hadn't had my breakfast! 🤣

[Matchstick 1,886]

2 hours ago, Ridvan Celik said:

Yes just to fly it in a subpar cartoon environment 😱

How to say you don't use XP without saying you don't use XP 😉

[rick celik 1,243]

26 minutes ago, Matchstick said:

How to say you don't use XP without saying you don't use XP 😉

Or how to say I used xp, fs98 through to p3d all the way up to v5 and then msfs came along and now I use that. Let’s not start the xp vs msfs argument and let our eye sight do the judging on visuals. 

[rick celik 1,243]

36 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Yep, my mistake. I hadn't had my breakfast! 🤣

I was about to say you’re starting the wine early on in the week 😎 (was dinner time here in Sydney) 

[Krakin 5,761]

2 hours ago, GoranM said:

No offense, but this is why I like to address such things in private. Some people are not open to my response.  And that's fine.  To those who are interested, I'm happy to let them know.  There's already a few in here who have asked me in private.  1 of them as recently as about a month ago.  

 

I'd be happy to hear your points. Feel free to DM me.