Newly released UFO footage.

[martin-w 3,113]

One of them looked like a guy on a bike riding through a field. 🙄

 

 

Edited September 23 by martin-w

[Swe_Richard 1,119]

Well, yeah... each time I hear about UFOs I kind of tend to think 'DISTRACTION' for some reason... 😉

 

[FBW737 366]

Grainy footage of identified flying objects render then almost unidentifiable. That was a guy on a bike for sure and the one near the end was a party balloon some kid lost his grip on the string. All the others are either military or civilian aircraft and perhaps even a couple of birds. Perspective can be very misleading! One of these so called leaked videos is definitely of a microlight trike. And I've changed my mind about he party balloon floating by the truck. It's a plastic shopping bag getting inflated and moved around by light wind.🤣

Edited September 23 by FBW737

[dmwalker 530]

If I am interpreting correctly, several of these UFOs were from 2 to 7 nm from the cameras. From 12:32 to the end, I couldn't see a thing and I was starting to get eyestrain. I thought the guy on the bike was actually this:

 

Edited September 23 by dmwalker

[spilok 1,089]

UFO footage is NEVER clear...always "grainy".  You would think that with the camera technology we have today in this world, that one time, 1TIME, we would be able to discern the UFO with clarity and EXTREME DETAIL!

I don't get it!

 

Stan

[martin-w 3,113]

Honestly, its like they are trying to wind us up. 

 

[martin-w 3,113]

9 minutes ago, spilok said:

UFO footage is NEVER clear...always "grainy".  You would think that with the camera technology we have today in this world, that one time, 1TIME, we would be able to discern the UFO with clarity and EXTREME DETAIL!

I don't get it!

 

Stan

 

Well it is IR from range I guess. There have been a few clear images... like the one below from Scotland, 30 years ago. The so called Calvine UFO. Two guys were poaching and claimed they photographed this craft below. 

 

 

Another famous photo...

 

 

 

Edited September 23 by martin-w

[spilok 1,089]

1 minute ago, martin-w said:

 

Well it is IR from range I guess. There have ben a few clear images... like the one below from Scotland, 30 years ago. The so called Calvine UFO. Two guys were poaching and claimed they photographed this craft below. 

 

 

 

30 years ago!  This is 2023, and we have no clear images after 30 years?

[martin-w 3,113]

11 minutes ago, spilok said:

30 years ago!  This is 2023, and we have no clear images after 30 years?

 

I guess if there was one, then people would just claim it was PhotoShop. 

I suppose we could say that 95% plus of sightings are natural phenomenon and only a very small percentage are mysterious, and most of those probably have a natural explanation, so there aren't that many genuinely mysterious occurrences to photograph. 

If its a relatively rare event, usually at speed and altitude, then maybe that would explain it. I have one of the best phone cameras around, but it would struggle with anything a distance away. 

Edited September 23 by martin-w

[jason74 99]

5 hours ago, spilok said:

UFO footage is NEVER clear...always "grainy".  You would think that with the camera technology we have today in this world, that one time, 1TIME, we would be able to discern the UFO with clarity and EXTREME DETAIL!

I don't get it!

 

Stan

its the same with bigfoot always grainy ,very poor video quality which make me think 100% fake. The only UFO footage to have any credibility is the USN Super hornet footage 

Edited September 23 by jason74

[dmwalker 530]

Why are the crosshairs so fuzzy from 0:46 to 1:53 while others are so sharp? Is that just older technology?

[Fielder 3,326]

Mission accomplished (Larson)

 

[Fielder 3,326]

Larson's Farside is still active. ^He published this online only a few days ago.

[stans 656]

I'm guessing that all the modern grainy images from the average person are from smart phone cameras set on maximum magnification.  I know my iPhone 11 takes nice pics up close, but anything at distance and then to use the camera's "magnification" results in a grainy image.

[martin-w 3,113]

1 hour ago, stans said:

I'm guessing that all the modern grainy images from the average person are from smart phone cameras set on maximum magnification.  I know my iPhone 11 takes nice pics up close, but anything at distance and then to use the camera's "magnification" results in a grainy image.

 

Yep. My S21 Ultra has an awesome camera, but as soon as you go for max magnification its utterly blurry. The sensors are small in phones, so we cant expect SLR quality. Not that I know much about this digital stuff and megapixydixywixywincles, my training and experience involved sloshing stuff around in a dish and agitating film in a dev tank. 😁