Inibuilds making an A320neo as part of SU14

[james42 220]

Inibuilds sure are busy. A310, AN225, the upcoming A300 and now the A320 all in the last year or so. I'm guessing they must have a huge number of developers working on their behalf. Plus a fair amount of funding from Microsoft too I'm sure.

[bhx22 38]

Why what a waste of time 

 

[Tuskin38 5,942]

2 minutes ago, bhx22 said:

Why what a waste of time 

No it isn't, the default A320 is terrible. It needs an upgrade, and console pilots can't use the FlyByWire.

Edited September 28 by Tuskin38

[bhx22 38]

3 minutes ago, edpatino said:

Needless to me. FBW one is already good enough. Inibuilds, as mentioned before, needs to learn more about optimizing FPS in both their scenery and aircraft products in my opinion.

So true their airports are like static works of art, amazing to look at on pause but so badly optimised they should sort that mess out before making a plane we don't need.

Just my take.

[Pilot53 499]

I really wish it was an a321neo

[Tuskin38 5,942]

1 minute ago, bhx22 said:

So true their airports are like static works of art, amazing to look at on pause but so badly optimised they should sort that mess out before making a plane we don't need.

Just my take.

The A320 is a Microsoft sponsored project.

Also I'm pretty sure their aircraft team and scenery team are different developers.

Edited September 28 by Tuskin38

[bhx22 38]

1 minute ago, Tuskin38 said:

No it isn't, the default A320 is terrible. It needs an upgrade, and console pilots can't use the FlyByWire.

Ok fair enough if your a gamer.

[Tuskin38 5,942]

3 minutes ago, bhx22 said:

Ok fair enough if your a gamer.

There's serious pilots on the X-Box as well.

The A310 is on there, and it can't even use the built flight plan maker, you need do it manually, or use simbrief.
Wouldn't be surprised if the A320neo was the same.

Edited September 28 by Tuskin38

[bhx22 38]

3 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

There's serious pilots on the X-Box as well.

The A310 is on there, and it can't even use the built flight plan maker, you need do it manually, or use simbrief.
Wouldn't be surprised if the A320neo was the same.

I have no knowledge of the X-Box version but it sounds a pain but each too their own and i imagine its a lot cheaper to set up than the pc money pit.

[Tuskin38 5,942]

6 minutes ago, bhx22 said:

I have no knowledge of the X-Box version but it sounds a pain but each too their own and i imagine its a lot cheaper to set up than the pc money pit.

Yeah, there were some people on this very forum that opted for the x-box version because of the cost of upgrading or buying a new PC.

Thrustmeter's newest flight sim hardware supports both PC and X-box, and the X-Box also supports mouse and keyboard.

Only thing they don't get, obviously, is freeware mods.

Edited September 28 by Tuskin38

[blueshark747 1,765]

Do folks feel the default A320 is really that terrible?

My last flight in the thing was fine, it followed the flight plan and I had no issues with performance nor the buttons.

I never cared for A320s enough to go the FENIX nor FBW route though...

Edited September 28 by blueshark747

[Car147 2,166]

I just hope for a A350 at some point, but realise it's maybe a no go trying to get the relevant data/info for an aircraft that's pretty recent.

[Tuskin38 5,942]

inibuilds is working on modern airliner they haven't announced.

They confirmed on Discord that the A320NEO is not their secret project.

Edited September 28 by Tuskin38

[Gazzareth 691]

27 minutes ago, blueshark747 said:

I never cared for A320s enough to go the FENIX nor FBW route though...

No reason not to get the FBW as it's free .. .. in previous SIMs I would go on to comment about how default aircraft suck - but thanks to WT I can't use that line anymore.

FBW is nice though, I've had far worse payware...

 

G

[pilotter 227]

I would like to see a dash 8