June 29, 20241 yr 4 hours ago, Cpt_Piett said: I picked this sentence to quote, as for me, the biggest drawback of TLOD 50* is that the runway is blurry. Interesting. I see the center line of taxiways get blurry maybe 100' out from the nose of the plane when TLOD is low but the rest of the runway looks fine, and I can live with that since near the plane the centerline remains sharp. Noel System: 9900X3D Noctua NH-D15 G2, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL 64GB (2 x 32GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Front Edge Sync. Aircraft used in MSFS 2024: Fenix A320, Aerosoft CRJ, FBW, WT 787X, I-Fly 737 MAX 8, Citation Longitude.
June 29, 20241 yr 13 hours ago, AnkH said: I tried several times, but the input lag is just to big for me. So back to basic FG for me and of course, AutoFPS with TLOD turned down to 50 on big hubs. 50+ FPS on KLAX with 75% AIG AI Traffic is fine. It IS a lot smoother using 36FPS limit and lossless on x2 resulting in a total of 72FPS on top of AutoFPS and FG, but the input lag is just unbearable. The problem with that is, if you fly somewhere with mountains, like SLC or LOWI, the mountains look like melted ice cream. AMD 9950X3D | 64 GB RAM | RTX 5090 FMR: 747 FO, 757/767 CAPT, 737 Check Airman Current 777 CAPT
June 29, 20241 yr 2 hours ago, V1ROTA7E said: The problem with that is, if you fly somewhere with mountains, like SLC or LOWI, the mountains look like melted ice cream. Well, SLC or LOWI are far from being big hubs, no need for AutoFPS reducing TLOD down to 50 in such places... Greetings, Chris AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 2x32GB DDR5 6000MT/s RAM, MSI RTX 4090 Ventus 3X, Windows 11 Home, MSFS2024
June 29, 20241 yr With a second generation Ryzen and an Nvidia 3060 I have limited options, but with the Frame Gen and AutoFPS mods I get very satisfactory results when running the following: FSLTL Traffic (set to max), FSR, BATC, FS ATC, FSFO v5, MSFS2020 Enhanced Maps. I run MSFS at 2560x1440 with a mixture of Ultra, High and medium settings and get an average of 50FPS. EDIT: I forgot to mention, I also stream every flight using OBS Edited June 29, 20241 yr by SierraHotel AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 4.2 32 gig ram, Nvidia RTX3060 12 gig, Intel 760 SSD M2 NVMe 512 gig, M2NVMe 1Tbt (OS) M2NVMe 2Tbt (MSFS) Crucial MX500 SSD (Backup OS). VR Oculus Quest 2 Windows 11 25H2 YouTube:- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC96wsF3D_h5GzNNJnuDH3WQ 2k+ Videos & Streams BATC and FSFO FB Group:- https://www.facebook.com/groups/1571953959750565 Flight Sim First Officer (FSFOv6) and SoFly Beta Tester Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation!
June 29, 20241 yr Capn P did you do your XMP and HT testing yet? I'm finding the sim super smooth since. Before I was getting 22-28 before fg now I'm often at the locked 30. My weighting is 75/25 olod /ai 😎 Russell Gough SE London
June 29, 20241 yr Author 19 minutes ago, sloppysmusic said: Capn P did you do your XMP and HT testing yet? I'm finding the sim super smooth since. Before I was getting 22-28 before fg now I'm often at the locked 30. I did, should be a video out on my channel. 11% fps increase (more smooth too) with XMP on HT off. 17% increase with XMP on, HT off and a CPU overclock. 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
June 29, 20241 yr 3 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said: I did, should be a video out on my channel. 11% fps increase (more smooth too) with XMP on HT off. 17% increase with XMP on, HT off and a CPU overclock. Did you do a comparison between xmp on HT off and xmp on HT on? I'd love to see the exact impact of HT! I COULD do it myself but I'm not on the same level as you with in depth comparisons! I'll look for that video! Russell Gough SE London
June 29, 20241 yr Author 6 minutes ago, sloppysmusic said: Did you do a comparison between xmp on HT off and xmp on HT on? I'd love to see the exact impact of HT! I COULD do it myself but I'm not on the same level as you with in depth comparisons! HT + XMP off. HT on XMP off. HT off XMP on. Interestingly, HT off resulted in a significant performance decrease. Might not happen on all systems though. (EXPO/SMT are the AMD equivalents of Intel’s XMP/HT) Edited June 29, 20241 yr by Cpt_Piett 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
June 29, 20241 yr 9 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said: Interestingly, HT off resulted in a significant performance decrease Top man! Yes I was wondering if the talk about modern CPUs having the internal tech to assign workloads correctly was accurate or just talk. I'll stay with HT and XMP (Intel) on then! Thanks for doing the testing for the rest of us :D Russell Gough SE London
June 29, 20241 yr Author 1 hour ago, sloppysmusic said: I'll stay with HT and XMP (Intel) on then! I would try with HT off, you might get a bit more performance by doing that. Edited June 29, 20241 yr by Cpt_Piett 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
June 29, 20241 yr 13 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said: I would try with HT on, you might get a bit more performance by doing that. Yes that's what I've been using. Although had XMP off for 3 months after that firmware update. Working nice and smooth now in other games too. Russell Gough SE London
June 29, 20241 yr Author 5 minutes ago, sloppysmusic said: Yes that's what I've been using. Sorry, typo, I meant HT off. But things might be different with your CPU. HT on significantly decreased performance with my AMD chip. 7950X3D | RTX 4090 | 64GB DDR5
June 29, 20241 yr 4 minutes ago, Cpt_Piett said: Sorry, typo, I meant HT off. But things might be different with your CPU Oh really? Well everything is running smooth so I'll leave it on. 14900F here. I seem to have a good one! Russell Gough SE London
Create an account or sign in to comment