Microsof FSX's success: FS9 vs. FSX sales

[Guest RichardL]

Now there's a thought. Standard version for gamers and Advanced version for those of us who live at Avsim. Wonder why MS didn't think of that?Addition of Missions. What's that about? (please read as humor)

[Mace 1,927]

>>Perhaps it's me the dense one, but why should the migration be>necessarily from FS9 through FSX to FSX1?>It shouldn't. It's just that you will have a long long time to wait before FS11. And so to that poster it seems a long time to wait, I think that's what he was saying.Besides, you could fly both FS9 and FSX, depending on what you're going to do. I mean, fly the Project Tupolev Tu-154 in FS9, because it's so good. But then fly the Eaglesoft Twin Comanche in FSX, because it's so good. I really don't see what the big deal is. I do both all the time.RhettAMD 3700+ (@2585 mhz), eVGA 7800GT 256 (Guru3D 93.71), ASUS A8N-E, PC Power 510 SLI, 2gb Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8 (1T), WD 150 gig 10000rpm Raptor, WD 250gig 7200rpm SATA2, Seagate 120gb 5400 rpm external HD, CoolerMaster Praetorian

[tf51d 284]

Phil, please check your PM, (Unrelated but important issue)Thanks!

[AWACS 12]

I'm sticking with FSX, I only get 5 FPS over the South China Sea in FSXI :)