Should 3rd party developers be held to the same standards as the Microsoft Flight Simulator Franchise?

[Guest bdg52]

Here was an interesting thread about FSX compliance. It was quite awhile ago but I do remember the heat. There are other threads way back, and very interesting to hear the 3pd's responses.http://forums.avsim.net/dcboard.php?az=sho...&mesg_id=364018Bob

[N400QW 205]

The decision to go with seperate FS9 or FSX product line has proven to be correct even though it was made when there was no knowledge of FSX/SP1 or FSX/SP2 and now FSX/SP2/DX10 Compliance.It should be noted that Liberty XL2 was our first FSX offering and it has recently been updated to full SP2/DX10 Compliance at no additional cost to original owners and new customers alike.:-)In case anyone is unaware, we have followed the same path with ALL of our FSX offerings and only have two left to complete. They are our Cirrus SR20/SR22 Series and our Beechjet/Hawker 400 Series.Both Series are undergoing those rebuilds as we speak and of course all new Eaglesoft FSX offerings will be SP2/DX10 Compliant right out of the gate:-)