Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Walouigi

FDC Live or PFE?

Recommended Posts

Opinions on either of these? I love the Super MD-80 and need some extra audio to round this package out. I am familiar with FDC in FS9, but not PFE. If you were to own only one of these, which would it be?Thanks in advance,Noel


Noel

System:  7800x3D, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, Noctua NH-U12A, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL Ripjaws S5 Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Edge Sync for near zero Frame Time Variance achieving ultra-fluid animation at lower frame rates.

Aircraft used in A Pilot's Life V2:  PMDG 738, Aerosoft CRJ700, FBW A320nx, WT 787X

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HelloWhy only one, They both do totally different things.PFE is purely an ATC program that is a replacement for the default ATCFDC has no ATC element but lots of cockpit ambiance.Both Are Very good at what they do but the two programs areabout as different as it is possible to get.Great support by Dave March,Get both

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently moved over from Radar Contact (ATC) to PFE (also ATC). Although I feel Radar Contact is somewhat more 'user friendly', I still prefer PFE. That's by no means a crit of RC, which is great.I've been having a query with an 'optional' part of PFE and, as posted above, the support is good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>I recently moved over from Radar Contact (ATC) to PFE (also>ATC). >>Although I feel Radar Contact is somewhat more 'user>friendly', I still prefer PFE. That's by no means a crit of>RC, which is great.>>I've been having a query with an 'optional' part of PFE and,>as posted above, the support is good.Thanks Phil, can I ask you, which sound sets seem more realistic and natural *sounding* (versus content per se)?


Noel

System:  7800x3D, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, Noctua NH-U12A, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL Ripjaws S5 Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Edge Sync for near zero Frame Time Variance achieving ultra-fluid animation at lower frame rates.

Aircraft used in A Pilot's Life V2:  PMDG 738, Aerosoft CRJ700, FBW A320nx, WT 787X

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Hello>Why only one, They both do totally different things.>PFE is purely an ATC program that is a replacement for the>default ATCWell, I'm not sure I want different ATC, not that the default one is accurate or too desirable. I guess it's partly the cost of buying two, but even more, the time cost in learning yet another piece of software. I'm already wiling away alot of hours in the flight simming world!Thanks for your insights :()


Noel

System:  7800x3D, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, Noctua NH-U12A, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL Ripjaws S5 Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Edge Sync for near zero Frame Time Variance achieving ultra-fluid animation at lower frame rates.

Aircraft used in A Pilot's Life V2:  PMDG 738, Aerosoft CRJ700, FBW A320nx, WT 787X

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest jshyluk

Here is my AVSIM review of FDC:http://www.avsim.com/pages/0307/FDC/FDC.htmIn the "History" section (how many of you folks actually read that??), I describe how FDC Live Cockpit! is the successor to Dave March's S-Combo program, which was itself a stand-alone utility to be used with ProFlight2000 by AETI. Dave got the rights to ProFlight2000 and updated it into PFE.The whole thing is like heads and tails on a coin. The heads and the tails look totally different, but they are two sides to a unified product. Jeff ShylukAssistant Managing EditorSenior Staff ReviewerAVSIM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PFE is a must in my book. I implement it in virtually every flight. Dave continues to periodically add new provisions and features. However, I do agree with mad dog, why not both? Dave sets the benchmark in kind, and immediate help. Good luck:RTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>>I recently moved over from Radar Contact (ATC) to PFE (also>>ATC). >>>>Although I feel Radar Contact is somewhat more 'user>>friendly', I still prefer PFE. That's by no means a crit of>>RC, which is great.>>>>I've been having a query with an 'optional' part of PFE and,>>as posted above, the support is good.>>Thanks Phil, can I ask you, which sound sets seem more>realistic and natural *sounding* (versus content per se)?PFE (imho)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...