32 minutes ago, HiFlyer said:

Perhaps I am wrong, but my feeling is that for a company that releases new airports at a breakneck pace, they take interminable amounts of time to fix those airports once released.

I cannot argue with that. It took 18 months to get the runway centreline alignment fixed at EGHI Southampton, and the low resolution texture taxiway signs and inconsistent airfield terrain textures (admittedly, this latter one appears to be a Bing problem, but it still needs to be sorted out) are still outstanding issues.

It’s gone out to influencers, so it’s probably out soon

Now if only the FSS ejets were in better shape

Edited Wednesday at 03:09 PM5 days by Tuskin38

Sad state of affairs where we have a world class LCY scenery but only mediocre regional jets and props...

The closest international airport to me, although I'm yet to fly from there. If it works well with the Orbx London City pack I could maybe be persuaded.

On 5/22/2026 at 4:37 PM, The_Flying_Potato said:

Managed to land there yesterday and come to a complete stop in an A320Neo. :-)

Try this next!

Edited Wednesday at 03:20 PM5 days by btacon

On 5/24/2026 at 12:07 AM, falcon71 said:

Just one detail to consider:

The Orbx version is already outdated. They still have the displaced thresholds on the runway, which no longer exists. This can make a huge difference with the tight performance calculations at this airport.

Up to this date that have never affected any of my calculations. The airport works fine for me.

4 hours ago, St Mawgan said:

The closest international airport to me, although I'm yet to fly from there. If it works well with the Orbx London City pack I could maybe be persuaded.

We don't officially guarantee nor advertise compatibility.

That being said, you'll be fine to use the both together. Majority of the custom POIs included in the scenery don't overlap with Orbx London or default Microsoft POIs.

There are a couple that may overlap (like Thames Barrier and Cable Car), but you will be able to disable them via iniManager options if you want to run the two together.

Edited Wednesday at 07:39 PM5 days by IniJamir

What about PG? Is it workable with PG disabled?

Edited Wednesday at 07:49 PM5 days by Christopher Low

1 hour ago, Christopher Low said:

What about PG? Is it workable with PG disabled?

based on their previous releases, use your imagination

KBUR (Burbank) Orbx V.1 I like. But then they brought out V. 2 which is the only airport that stutters like mad if I try to land there. So, I stick with V.1. I think V.2 of other Orbx airports may be a problem.

Whilst the IniBuilds version of the airport clearly looks better, I can understand the comment by one user on the FSElite website. That grass (and the underlying textures) looks a bit strange when compared to the lovely 3D procedural grass that we get as standard in MSFS 2024.

On 6/3/2026 at 4:12 PM, thepilot said:

Sad state of affairs where we have a world class LCY scenery but only mediocre regional jets and props...

Try Just Flight's BAe146 and Avro RJ - they are/were common sights at London City, and both are excellent.

Edit - duplicate, sorry

Edited Saturday at 11:41 AM2 days by St Mawgan

8 hours ago, Christopher Low said:

That grass (and the underlying textures) looks a bit strange when compared to the lovely 3D procedural grass that we get as standard in MSFS 2024.

They’re apparently working on it