Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Marcel_Felde

How to improve performance of instruments in the virtua...

Recommended Posts

Guest Marcel_Felde

Hello together,The virtual cockpit is a nice addition in FS, but in most addons it is not usable, as the framerate of the gauges (not the framerate of FS while using the virtual cockpit!) is poor. Also you may have 30 FPS while sitting in the 3d cockpit, the instruments look like a gif animation. For me, that was a show stopper. While developing the DA-20 Katana, I spent some time to find a way for fluent moving needles, attitude indicators and compass cards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Robert Sanderson

Hi Marcel,Man this is a subject near and dear to me!Bill Leaming was kind enough to point this fact of VC life out to me last August, as I have 17 VCockpit sections in my Hurricane's panel config file and a very poor gauge refresh rate.I used FSDS2 to create the aircraft for FS2004, and as xml animations are not possible with that program, many of my VCockpit sections concern invisible gauges to make the controls clickable and gauges for visible animations such as trim wheels and knobs. As you say, the problem is independent of framerates, and with only one VCockpit section the refresh rate is quite good and the gauges are smooth. As a partial workaround, you can map the same gauge to different locations. I did this with my cockpit lights, but I'm really waiting for a new version of FSDS as using GMAX/MakeMdl is not an option as far as I'm concerned!It would have been nice if the patch for FS2004 had fixed this issue for us!Take care,Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Marcel_Felde

Hi Robert,>as I have 17 VCockpit sections in my Hurricane's panel I assume that you had one needle movement a flight simulator session? ;-)Why isnt't GMax/MakeMdl an option for you? Too much new stuff to learn?Greetings,Marcel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Robert Sanderson

"I assume that you had one needle movement a flight simulator session? ;-)"At best! Seriously, the effect wasn't that bad, just annoying. For example, the tachometer will move in 50 rpm increments instead of smoothly. I figured no one will do much IFR flying in a warbird, but for other types of aircraft this is a serious limitation.Way too steep a learning curve with GMAX, and MakeMdl ain't exactly user friendly. I can create a fairly good-looking exterior model in a week with FSDS2, I'd be a year learning all the ins and outs of GMAX, if ever. I just returned from vacation, and I'm picking up with my aircraft projects. A really great Xmas present would be a new version of FSDS that supported the new animations and part tags, and it wouldn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Way too steep a learning curve with GMAX, and MakeMdl ain't>exactly user friendly.What on earth do you mean "MakeMdl ain't exactly user friendly?" I rarely - if ever - pay any attention whatsoever to MakeMDL! It's simply another automatic and intermediate process to convert a .gmax source to a compiled .mdl file.I only use MiddleMan & Model Commander in the export path to allow me to toggle on/off certain features of MakeMDL so I don't have to hand edit the MakeMDL.cfg file each time... :)For 99% of the compiled models I make, I simply use the saved defaults of MiddleMan.OTOH, I will acknowledge the learning curve of GMax, but to be honest, I would encounter an equally difficult learning curve with FSDS2! Although I own FSDS2, I only bought it to assist my partner in crime Bobby Hayes & Louis Sinclair to implement VC gauge backlighting in FSDS2...Starting from 'ground zero,' I'll posit that the learning curve for either modeling program would be about equal. However, for someone who's already at the "Adept Level" in either program, the learning curve would be much steeper than it would for someone at the 'ground zero' level... :)


Fr. Bill    

AOPA Member: 07141481 AARP Member: 3209010556


     Avsim Board of Directors | Avsim Forums Moderator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Marcel and everyone.The statement:>The framerate drops with the amount of panel entries in the virtual cockpit section of the panel.cfg. Use one panel only, the gauges work fine. With two panel entries, the gauges are still usable. Try to get more panel entries in the cfg, and your gauges will stutter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Marcel_Felde

Hello,Of course do texture sizes, coding and the amount of polygons lower the framerate (of FS), but I am only speaking of the gauges in the vcp, how fluent they work. And if you have more than 3 panel entries in the panel config, you don't need to care of the complexity of your cockpit, because the instruments allready stutter (again, I am not talking about the framerate of FS, which can be 70 fps, your gauges will still not be usable).I hope I made clear what I mean... ;-)Regards,MarcelPS: Robert, let me also encourage you to give gmax a try. I must confess, it is not easy to learn, and yes, makemdl aborts exportation process sometimes for some reasons, and you have to search where the trouble comes from. But it is a powerfull tool, and you will be able to add much more features to your airplanes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>Hi Bill, when I began trying to model aircraft for FS2004 last>March, I naturally started with GMAX as it


Fr. Bill    

AOPA Member: 07141481 AARP Member: 3209010556


     Avsim Board of Directors | Avsim Forums Moderator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.>And if you have more than 3 panel entries in the panel config, you don't need to care of the complexity of your cockpit, because the instruments allready stutter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Marcel_Felde

>Thanks Marcel. You and Bill have done a good job selling GMAXHow do you wish to pay? :-)If you have problems/questions, feel free to contact me via email. Greetings,Marcel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Marcel_Felde

I have a quite different experience here: one additional panel -and let it have only 1x1 pixel- drops the framerate more a lonely big panel probably could. But I can only speak for my system. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Robert Sanderson

"How do you wish to pay? :-)"The check's in the mail!:)"If you have problems/questions, feel free to contact me via email."Thank you Marcel, I will do that.Take care,Robert

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest LilSki

First off I would like to say I was the guy Robert talked to about the welding verticies. And I would also like to disagree with n4gix if I could :)Yes you can turn off weld vertices and optimize as this is what I do for all my models. But the weld verticies ONLY applies to the exterior model. I can make a part as small as I want on the exteriors with less than 1mm between vertices and will not have a problem. The second you go into the VC if anything is within 4mm it gets welded or misaligned. I've done many tests with this and have come up with nothing. Makemdl will always weld verticies in the VC. Now before you flame me to death remember I am doing small GA aircraft. This may not be a problem in the larger GA to heavy VC's as things are generally bigger. But if I want some 1/4 nuts around the windows or a some small linkages for rudder cables it cannot be done. If you have my L-16 you will notice a few bolts on the trim lever plate and some places on the frame. Those are the smallest bolts I can possibly have in the VC. Anyway on the VC gauge refresh I haven't looked much into this issue as my last aircraft has very few gauges. Of course the gauge texture sizes are going to play a large role and also the amount of gauges in the VC. Since my last aircraft had fully custom gauges I had to play around with the texture sizes to find the best medium between speed and quality. Although I did notice the larger the gauge textures are the slower the actual frame rate will be.But really it's up to MS to design a new VC gauge system IMO.Kevin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...