Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest JohnC

Exporting Gmax animation

Recommended Posts

Guest JohnC

I cannot seem to export the animation of ny rotating radar antenna. It works perfectly in gmax, and I can export a simple rotating box but not my more complex antenna. I tried Grouping the components of the antenna, and tried Boolean union, Neither worked. I read the animation SDK but it is not a model of technical writing. Nevertheless, I took all the precautions I could from it. Both the rotating part and the total bgl have prefixes of tick18_name.Additionally, when I Booleaned them together the vertical axis of rotation changed. Is there a way to set the (vertical) axis of rotation of a complex structure?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,For the export problem I do not have a clear answer. In general group parts is a cause of trouble, so it is better not to group them. But you write that also without grouping it does not work (and that should work).About the rotation axis, that is determined by the pivot point of your animation. You can set this point in GMax.


Arno

If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done.

FSDeveloper.com | Former Microsoft FS MVP | Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JohnC

Arno...thanks for the pivot point hint. I was sure a Boolean would do the trick with regard to animation but so far no luck. I left my GMAX Bible in Florida so I am temporarily stuck. The fact that the animation always works in GMAX and that I can animate a single box has a clue in there somewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JohnC

Arno, I was told on Turbo Squid to make the rotating part a child linked to a dummy box. I originally was able to rotate a simple box without doing this but a complex radar dish Booleaned together apparently needs this. In any case it worked. He (Fr Bill) warned me about grouping too, so I will use grouping only as a temporary construction aid. Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reporting the dummy link tip. I never needed it myself (yet), but it is good to remember this one if I encounter a problem like this :).


Arno

If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done.

FSDeveloper.com | Former Microsoft FS MVP | Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JohnC

You're welcome. With regards to grouping though, I can't see any other way to link a particular "bunch" of buildings to a dummy box when setting up several LOD's. Grouping DOES work there, for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not just link them all to the dummy one by one? That is how I normally do it. Or combine certain parts with boolean first.I used groups quite a lot when I started with GMax, but in the end I think it gives more trouble with MakeMDL then it solves.


Arno

If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done.

FSDeveloper.com | Former Microsoft FS MVP | Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JohnC

Hi Arno....I don't want to appear pigheaded, butI have 445 objects I would have to link to a dummy. Then, suppose I wanted to do a different LOD with a simpler structure, say 100 objects. I have to name the two "groups" anyway with different names and a different suffix....say x_LOD_100 and x_LOD_050. The only way I know to link two separate entities to one dummy at 0,0,0 is to group them, then link the groups. I may be missing something obvious here. It won't be the first time............

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John,With that many objects my approach does not sound that good indeed :). But you could of course all give them the LOD name and link them to the same dummy. But as I said, with that many parts I wouldn't choose that approach.


Arno

If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done.

FSDeveloper.com | Former Microsoft FS MVP | Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JohnC

Thanks for your insight and patience. I have learned much from your experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JohnC

..one last point howerver...if you have two separate groups of hundred of objects, and you ungroup them both.........you are stuck with a hopeless jumble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true, but how did you manage to get that many objects into one 3D objects? My buildings hardly ever use that many different parts.


Arno

If the world should blow itself up, the last audible voice would be that of an expert saying it can't be done.

FSDeveloper.com | Former Microsoft FS MVP | Blog

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest JohnC

I have a very detailed set of structures built up over 2 years while I was learning GMAX. If I had been more experienced, I would have taken a different approach to this complex, but it is what it is now. It's a 604k bgl without a lower LOD. Maybe you would like to see some screenshots?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...