Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest lou ross

Method to deal with "Off Course" comments

Recommended Posts

Guest lou ross

Long distances between waypoints provokes these messages- I think it could be due to MS straight-line nav vs. great circle, but I could be way off on that one. Anyway, when the controller tells me I'm off route, the easiest way I've found is to request deviations due to wx. The other suggestion was to add many short distance waypoints, but that's a lot of work. Deviations for wx allows long distance flights. Any comments? lr.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started having that problem when using high-altitude airways. If I used long-range VORs, I would get that error. If I monitored via GPS, I noted the difference and if I followed the flight plan on the GPS correcting to the displayed track, I did not generate those warnings.It seems there is a coarse rounding error when attempting to change the courseetting on VOR CDI displays in that you get quite a deflection step for a one degree change if you are quite some distance away attempting to home on a VOR and/or using your flight plan radials. It does not take too much of an off course deviation VOR CDI indication to go beyond acceptable limits when the VORs are widely spaced as in the high altitude routes.I believe buried in the RC manual is a statement regarding GC deviation vs direct paths when flight planning causing errors on long legs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest lou ross

Understand what you're saying. I'm using the FMC routing in PIC767. I'll look thru the RC manual, I could have missed that info. lr.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i had put in a great circle route calculation when i started 3.1 work. but it broke something else (i can't remember what it was), so i took it out, and reverted to the old code.sorry. many intersections between distant points is the way to go, at the moment. i'll make a note to fix it for good in 4.0.jd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what does your navigation trigonometry tell us is the max leg between navigation points before we get those off course errors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've had my fill of trig, with the conflict detection routine. actually my good friend john burgess did the trig, i just coded it.my guess is you could get by with 120-150 mile legs.just a swagjd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually you can get away with 300ml legs as long as you're not too far north or south of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...