Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Guest

Altitude Density - is it modelled

Recommended Posts

Guest Twister

I guess we can conclude this issue by saying that Density Altitude is reasonably well modelled in FS2K2.Nice to know.Cheers.Twister

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I just wanted to make sure that we are all on the same page, and there is no miss understanding, since this applies to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Be sure to catch the latest edition of FLYING magazine. A lenthly article regarding the use of mixtures & CFI's........L.Adamson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Very nice article, avcomware, I'm sure . I just wanted to add a little comment on shooting the approaches without resetting the altimeter. Of course it's a huge mistake not to reset the altimeter with the local or if none is available the regional setting (by FSS), which leads to a difference of several hundreds of feet in your example. But there is another thing that almost nobody does : correcting the published minimas for the non-standard temperature. Imagine making an approach into a highly elevated aerodrome where the temperature is way colder than the standard temp for that pressure altitude. The altimeter will "over-read" because it's simply measuring pressure. You will however be much lower than you think, because the air being colder hence denser will be more "compact". The result is that pressure will diminish quicker with vertical distance than if the air would have been at standard density, thereby "compressing" the vertical scale of pressure altitudes. Not correcting the minimas in this case also leads to differences enough to make you hit the ground when reaching the minimums (MDA/DA). If you take an ILS approach CAT-I with a typical DH of 200 feet, and the airport is at 2500 feet of elevation, with a big enough deviation those 200 feet can easily be brought down to the terrain level ! The same applies for the glideslope check altitude at the outer marker. The published value must be corrected for non-standard temp otherwise one might think he's on a false glideslope signal. Of course, this doesn't apply to CAT-II & III approaches which use the Radio Altimeter instead of the baro altimeter to determine the minimums. Tables to correct for those deviations exist, and in fact correction is only significant from certain amount of deviation from standard atmosphere. Now actually all this is only used where the deviation is big enough to be significant. No need to correct for 10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...