Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. If I leave my LG OLED I take my remote, press the speech recognition button and say: „Screen off“. This sets the screen off but the TV is still running.
  3. Yet another update that has little to do with anything judging by the "changelog". Just because they don't release incremental beta updates for the A320 doesn't mean that's not the reason for this delay.
  4. Thx Alex, that's what I did in combination with the range rings! BR Hans
  5. Aerosoft Cologne-Bonn and iniBuilds Cologne-Bonn The most major change is currently being implemented in the real world. Due to the shifting of the magnetic heading RW32/14L and R will be renamed after 60 years to 31/13L and R with the next AIRAC on Thursday. This needs to be reflected in the signage in the sim as well.
  6. LatinVFR's TJSJ: Similar ground issues and terribly inaccurate parking spot placements.
  7. Just a hunch, but possibly the Bing servers are the issue. If you haven't tried the map enhancement tool - you should! Its freeware/payware and it just works. https://flightsim.to/file/19345/msfs-2020-google-map-replacement
  8. Maybe something management can discuss to fill the position. It’s wasted real estate space on the webpage that if used would bring additional traffic. I have some ideas.
  9. They're leaving that bombshell til last! 😄
  10. In this instance, for "early access," read: 'preview' or 'pre-release demo'. Unfortunately, Flightbeam has been guilty of early access airports. KDEN and KMSP were both quick releases with some features missing at launch with the promise of later updates, likely to prevent competitors stealing a march on their back catalogue. Anyway, Jo Sund's exceptional artwork again means his ENGM is a confirmed purchase for me.
  11. Ah, makes more sense. So an advanced review copy rather than early access.
  12. AFAIK, it's only some of the default models where the doors can be 'modded' to open (The C152, C172 and TBM). I believe this is because Asobo did model the doors as separate parts, but just didn't do the animation code (for some odd reason). I don't think the models for any of the default airliners can be modded so that the doors can be opened. Could be wrong.
  13. Not in the dialog windows which read coordinates (userpoints, jump to coordinate and others). You can use measurement lines for this: Alex
  14. Anyone dare to make a guess as to performance in MSFS with the Super model at 3,840 × 3,840 plus the wider FOV?
  15. Well...yet another update that has nothing to do with the A320
  16. That was never my impression I looked at single thread and multi performance and it is about in line with expectation, +25%. In this sim it's probably more than 25% but as I lock rate at 45 or so now that's good enough when we're stutter-free. Right now I'm in the FBW 320n and locked at 45fps at another KORD gate, whereas wide open it's 78fps, but haven't loaded FSLTL yet. My former locked rate was not quite there. I would need to lock at KORD at around 33 or so in this plane, so 45 is a meaningful change as that is in the realm of much greater doesn't add much compared to the diff between 34 and 45. TBH, adding 4090 was the best move here, and that is w/o using frame generation. The added VRAM and running Render Scale at 150% really made a nice difference visually. Had I not needed to move the 9900K into a different role I would not have done the upgrade. 7880X3D was also chosen for its modest cooling needs as I prefer air.
  17. Hi, is it implemented, to add / enter a position to the flight plan by Place-Bearing-Distance (PBD) information? For example: FUN211.0/006.0 (Funchal, 211.0°, 6.0 NM) Thx and BR Hans
  18. Which problems? Long standing problems that haven't been addressed in the past months/years? They won't begin with it just in the last 2 weeks of the beta. Or are there any regressions in SU15 Beta that make the experience worse than SU14?
  19. Yeah I think we are all under the consensus that FSL will be laughed out of the MSFS market if they want to hold on to their old P3d pricing structure. The $49 I paid for the Fenix on day one is probably one of the best Flightsim purchases I've ever made. Will gladly hand over the price they ask for the 319/321....getting the major majority of the A320 series for way less I think FSL may charge for the equivalent content, if they ever bring the A320 to the MSFS market (which even if they do, I think its years out at minimum)
  20. It will not be released as an early access...He just has an early access copy.
  21. Today
  22. Surely it would be a pretty hard sell if it was that bad?
  23. I absolutely love UK2000's new EGNC ..... I'd wanted a payware version of that airport in the sim for years, for lovely, short, local test flights to/from Newcastle. I hear what you're saying about the aviation museum though. It's not fab but I don't look at it too often. And yes the Eddit Stobart trucks 🙂 Still the main buildings and ground area is great I think, for the price. (I don't have high standards for airports - in fact I'd prefer more bundles of 'lite' airports, at a reduced price). I find the terrain is a mess on quite a few of the included handcrafted airports, undulating all over the place, as someone said like a rollercoaster. In my (usually unpopular) opinion, I find the Burning Blue Designs airfields greatly overrated, with dull, low res textures and signage on the buildings. They have tons of detail, but most look like they're from FS9.
  24. As mentioned in a previous thread on this topic there is a payware load screen replacement available - Stripr by //42
  25. Early Access... for airports is a thing now?! Well it was always going to be Aerosoft that came up with that idea. 😄 I'm not knocking Jo Erland's work though ..... he's made some stunning sceneries over the years.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...