Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. P2ATC manages it about 80% of the time for me, sometimes it likes to throw out nonsense altitude restrictions OR on vectors turns you way too late. G
  3. Thanks, however I don't see a file labeled gamelauncherhelper.exe in the MSFS folder, just FlightSimulator.exe. I looked in some of the sub folders too and did not see it there either.
  4. If thatยดs the roadmap I would say that the only thing that worked for BATC was the marketing? We saw working traffic/pushback videos months ago. Were they fake? Whatยดs going on here?
  5. Not sure what you even mean by changing a code. You just download the flightplan(s) [= airlines] and it will download and install all models and liveries it needs by itself.
  6. Ok, so where does it mention April??? ...The Horses are getting restless
  7. Thank's a lot P_7878! And looks very good your "Liberty", very detailed and realistic, not so simple clean, I like that...๐Ÿ™‚
  8. Great shots, thanks for showing.
  9. FSS simulates this real well in MSFS with their EA E175's. ๐Ÿ˜’
  10. Hi all, don't take this too serious, it was only a first attempt to do such a long flight of a big airline including time shift and so in the sim. But it was fun and most interesting and I realized that it can well be done in Aerofly, have to practice it. Thank you very much for viewing! Cheers Andreas
  11. Yea, wish it worked without requiring SteamVR though. SteamVR kills my msfs...Currently I must use VDXR and the OpenXR Toolkit to run msfs well enough in VR with my older machine here. Works pretty nice, much better than in years passed...so I'm not willing to go back to Steam's XR.
  12. Watch the video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=McYhsOw21Zw If you just want simple approaches to repeat, FSiPanel standard is plenty. IIRC, the failure triggers in Advanced are more detailed than the ones available to use in the Fenix MCDU.
  13. Thank's a lot PM, glad you like it! ๐Ÿ™‚ Thank you very much Bernd! ๐Ÿ™‚ The chopper has a service ceiling of 21.000 feet and the basecamp is a little less than 18.000, so it works. Of course it must be watched that there is not too much power left up there.
  14. As I mentioned I've decided not to buy it. For me it really boils down to personal preference. And the fact that I'm trying hard to refrain myself from buying every single new aircraft. When I want something a bit more complex (GA), I use the King Air. For a bit more simplicity, I'll go with the TBM850. Both are excellent in their own ways. As for airliners, I use the A300 when I feel like the added challenge. Or try a very challenging approach in the Fenix ๐Ÿ™‚
  15. Great shots from a lot of desert there and a very nice fighter oldtimer, F104 starfighter isn't it? Looks good...
  16. After update Navigraph login not working on Longitude.
  17. Your example is a VFR flight, not an IFR flight needing a flight plan. Just take off VFR without a flight plan, shoot the approach and call Tower for landing clearance.
  18. I'm installing AIG models right now. I'm hoping for better performance over FSLTL.
  19. Couldnt you have mentioned the iniBuilds A320 a few more times?๐Ÿคฃ
  20. Good idea to do the flight from KORD to Lake Geneva, just did it earlier, it's a very nice country all around. Very nice shots!
  21. Apparently they're having another one now (calling it their "Spring sale") running until 11 April. I'm tempted to grab the UK North, Central, and South bundle but I'll need to do some research to see if it's worth buying first.
  22. Not the same. It doesn't talk to AI let alone control AI traffic.
  23. Thank you PM! ๐Ÿ™‚ Thank's a lot PM_7878, there are more nice places from all the freeware, I just started exploring, they did a lot.
  24. I doesn't seem like any of those fixes had anything to do with Vnav and Lnav performance unless I'm missing something
  1. Load more activity
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...