Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Almost everything they make is a slideshow for me. It appears to be their signature characteristic. My machinery is pretty beefy and nothing made by no one else receives the beating that Inibuilds gives it. I hope someone there figures out how to perform, or they're ordered to by Microsoft.
  3. My guess? From my recollection the Duke is slated to use some SU15 features. Can’t release until SU15 is in production. The PA-38? Not so much I believe so no issue releasing mid flight SU15 so to speak. YMMV. TANSTAAFL -B
  4. I've recently landed at Gaspé (CYGP) and the terrain around the nearby water is very odd. It keeps resolving itself and finding strange elevations, etc. Is anyone able to look and see if it's just me?
  5. I really hope you can still use Live weather with different time of day. I generally like to fly daytime as this is when I fly in real time and the contrast of dark computer and light outside is never great.
  6. I think a Piper Tomahawk would look really good with a Red Duster painted on the tail.
  7. I’m just amazed by your level of knowledge on this topic. Same goes for many other people here on Avsim. Learn something new every day 🙂
  8. Check it again @simbol https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2128461104?t=1h38m3s
  9. Yes, I think people have taken the "about another week" statement quite literally and put 7 May down, but we will have to see. It seems they are collapsing their planned work for SU15 and SU16 into one SU now and so it is expected that it will take time. Is PMDG holding for SU15 too, or is that an assumption? I am not that interested in the 777 but I was looking forward to the Dukes. It if pushed much longer though I will hold off until the fall because the warmer weather is nearly here.
  10. Sorry, I almost regret saying it. I’m following all three threads. Still haven’t had the time to get it so far - but I will now 😁 Happy flying / deadly spins and blue skies!
  11. I watched, I didn't catch that.. what I read was they might need a week I never heard any date per say.. R.
  12. The -300ER is not the version of the 777 that I would want, so I will have to wait even longer before I can consider a purchase.
  13. Hopefully, but at least the A320v2 is better regarding performance.
  14. AFAIK it’s the best fleet so far, no other comes close. I mean in number and quality. It’s unmatched. And I’m talking about 2020. If 2024 is really a leap forward, the gap will be broadened.
  15. I have never once seen that message in four years of this game.
  16. If they’re doing an A330, I’d love for them to extend it to an A340-200/300. Something about the underpowered hairdryer seems fun to fly!
  17. Today
  18. The A300 is easier on my system than the Fenix is right now for me and their LAX recently got a nice optimization update. They'll sort the A310 out eventually but like I mentioned earlier, MS is the one slowing the updates down.
  19. Disappointing. I was hoping to recreate some World War II flights using the actual weather at the time.
  20. A very short video that doesn't show either weather depiction in the best light. Yes, MSFS is mostly cumulus, and that is true for weather in the distance. Even in your short video, ASFS cloud depiction was WAY better.
  21. I wonder how does the default planes in MSFS stack up to the default planes in the other sims? Anybody know? It seems like the default planes in MSFS are quite good now, especially with the iniBuilds Beluga and the iniBuilds A400M coming in MSFS 2024.
  22. You could probably include A2A's Comanche in that category, but I know what you mean.
  23. You know you can disable the interconnect? There are video’s on YouTube that show how to do it. I have done it and I prefer to fly that way.
  24. Typically these days we have a primary product team, then a much smaller support team to do the followups. The support and tidy group is usually entirely separate from the teams leading flagship titles. We are lucky that the sim has proven popular in sales, which makes a support team cost effective to create all the service packs. Sometimes in the lifecycle of a product we have to draw a line on service packs simply because the cost to develop the pack outweighs the current strength of sales revenue, based on a calculated "per head revenue" generation of everyone in the team. Keeping service teams smaller really keeps the costs down and drives that equation of salary vs revenue contribution for each dev to something manageable.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...