Jump to content

Ricardo41

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    5,245

  • Donations

    $0.00 

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ricardo41

  1. Ricardo41
    Please provide evidence for this statement.
  2. Ricardo41
    You know this, how?
  3. Ricardo41
    The World Map is a useless and clunky performance hog. Nothing there that you couldn't do from a simple menu: pick time, departure, arrival, weather, plane, done. The best thing for MSFS would be if Microsoft decided to buy up Navigraph and integrate charts and simbrief functionality directly into the sim.
  4. Ricardo41
    Not on avsim.....
  5. Ricardo41
    There are no "other flight sim groups" that are somehow entitled to "engagement" from Microsoft. Microsoft released the trailer where it felt its main audience is. I have no idea what you mean by "core flight simmers"-
  6. Ricardo41
    If I understand this correctly, MSFS is finally moving away from on the of the dullest conventions in the sim, the utterly boring "World Map". Now I can start with a mission and a purpose, be it mountain rescue, cargo transport, biz jet executive service, airline operations, etc. A huge win in my book. Hopefully, we'll be able to sort these missions by various parameters, for example, time, for those of us who only have limited time.
  7. Ricardo41
    There is. It's called "enjoying the game". And not turning it into a Power Point presentation. Thank God MSFS took away the fps counter.
  8. Ricardo41
    No, depending on settings, more like 30-50
  9. Ricardo41
    Classic avsim! Half the folks telling us they're not going to buy it. Anyways, Q8Pilot has a stream about this plane. https://www.youtube.com/@Q8Pilot
  10. Ricardo41
    The manual is 253 pages long, and the one for the EFB is 20 pages long. Looks to be pretty in depth.
  11. Ricardo41
    I'm running MSFS on a 1440p monitor with all settings to high and am getting 30-50 fps even at complex airports. Works for me. I stopped worrying about performance and frame rates a long time ago.
  12. Ricardo41
    Don't miss it all.
  13. Ricardo41
    This thread makes a strong case for using Vatsim.....
  14. Ricardo41
    No, he's just plain rude and insults people. Simple as that. No need to sugarcoat this.
  15. Ricardo41
    What does your internet issue have to do with an Avionics upgrade?
  16. Ricardo41
    I agree MSFS 2024 is the only future for flight simulation. Developers who don't realize this will soon be staring at empty bank accounts.
  17. Ricardo41
    AAU2 probably killed for good whatever ambitions QW may have had to bring their 787 to MSFS. This is what happens when you sit on your hands. Someone swallows up your market.
  18. Ricardo41
    There is no QW 787 for MSFS.
  19. Ricardo41
    MSFS 2020 runs well on lower-end hardware. MSFS will probably, too.
  20. Ricardo41
    Did you report this to the creator? He's very active on flightsim.to and also on WT's Discord channel
  21. Ricardo41
    Mod Works like a charm. No issues. Compatible with AAU1.
  22. Ricardo41
  23. Ricardo41
    The "Wooslemod" fixes issues and provides features that should have been there from the beginning. I really don't understand why doors opening and closing wasn't part of the default package.
  24. Ricardo41
    You keep reading things into things that simply aren't there and points that nobody argued. The fact of the matter is that MSFS 2020 gave ALL simulators a new lease on life. I'd even go so far as to argue that the continued existence of flight simulation IN GENERAL depends to a significant degree on the ongoing success of the MSFS franchise.
  25. Ricardo41
    The entire sim is "inaccurate". It's all make believe. If you believe it, then it is so.
×
×
  • Create New...