Ricardo41
-
Content Count
5,250 -
Donations
$0.00 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Ricardo41
-
-
12 minutes ago, odourboy said:t flight plan data from the MSFS World Map is causing problems.
Will this be fixed in a patch?
-
44 minutes ago, Janov said:MSFS lacks the gameplay depth to hold interest for long -
Yeah, no "gameplay depth" at all.
- 7
-
1 hour ago, JacquesBrel said:How do you want me to respond to that?
What's your opinion about the Steam player count?
Don't bother. He's the king of non sequiturs.
-
I strongly suggest that nobody, I mean, nobody download this mod.
Why?
You'll load up the CJ4...hours later you look up from the sim and realize that your dog has collapsed in the kitchen because you forgot to feed it.....Best mod ever, IMHO.
- 7
-
If everything is so difficult and the sdk is this that and the third, why is it that community members are able to achieve in a few months what it takes/took addon developers sometimes years to accomplish?
THe CJ4 went from being a toy to approaching "study level" in 4 months.
-
How Aerosoft releases go:
1. Hyped up release, promoted in the Aerosoft forums. Lots of pre-release posts from M.Kok.
2. Release and disappointment
3. The blame game begins.
4. Abuse is heaped on Hans Hartmann
5. Gaslighting begins - remember "Wingflexgate"?
6. People swear they'll never buy another Aerosoft product again.
7. The caravan moves on.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
- 4
-
2 hours ago, leprechaunlive said:Your "study level" probably isnt the same standard as others. The planes you cited are amazing achieviement, its borderline wizardry what these teams are doing, but it is still far from a true study level (without a proper failure systems and logics, its never gonna be study level anyways). The high price hardcore market is not shrinking. People that wanted that in other sims still want it on this one, but its true that it is a market that will not grow. Compared to the huge user base, it is still gonna remain a niche. (i think, i dont actually fly those)
What makes you think that failure modeling isn't on the road map of these or other developers?
- 1
-
The market for high priced addons is shrinking faster than a pair of tighty whities in the hot dryer cycle.
CJ4 is now close to study level: free
A320 approaching payware status: free.
Let me see here: I can get close to study level free, or I can pay $150 for a few more buttons, with a generous helping of developer arrogance. Mmmmm. Tough choice!
- 1
-
How do I access the new camera presets? Thanks
-
Looking forward to trying this out on the weekend.
- 2
-
9 hours ago, Chock said:In case you were unaware of this, the US Government does indeed make and publish its own first person shooter combat game for PC and XBox, You can download it from here.
And - as someone else noted - with regard to Aerosoft customers buying things such as OMSI and Euro and American Truck Simulator; what's wrong with that anyway?
I've played America's Army for many years. Never thought it was a particularly good shooter, but it was a free download.
I enjoy OMSI and Eurotruck Simulator, but nobody is going to confuse those games for the real Thing. In a similar vein, looking for accuracy down to the tiniest Details in Aerosoft's addons is a fool's errand.
-
Aerosoft isn't aiming for the "study level" market. Never have, never will.
Their customers are the same ones who buy Eurotruck simulator or OMSI.
Expecting anything different is expecting a leopard to lose its spots.
- 1
- 1
-
6 hours ago, MattNischan said:a curious disconnect
As I've said before, it's the kind of disconnect that opponents of Mike Tyson experienced. One minute they are strutting around in the ring, the next they're on the floor, wondering what the hell happened and where their career went.
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, WestAir said:Logical fallacy. The FAA does review simulators, and simulators are used to train real world pilots.
Would you be so kind as to link to a FAA review of an Aerosoft addon?
- 2
-
8 hours ago, jpe828 said:As a pilot myself (GA) it annoys me when "gamers" review stuff. It is tough to find someone who actually knows what they are looking at when reviewing an addon. I need more than "look how good it looks".
It's a game, therefore it should be reviewed by gamers. I don't see the Pentagon reviewing the Call of Duty series.
- 2
-
For full enjoyment of the Longitude you'll want to install the following mods:
https://github.com/Working-Title-MSFS-Mods/fspackages
Go to the bottom of the github page to see the latest version(s)
Discussion of range, fuel burn and efficiency:
Longitude checklist and speed tables:
https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/longitude-checklist-now-available/330061/9
- 1
-
I'll be trying Rob's mods out soon, obviously, there are many more great mods. I keep an Excel sheet of my flights and the planes I fly them with, and these are the top four (for me)
-
1. 200 miles or less: DA 62
2. 400 to 600 miles: TBM 930
3. 400 to 1000 nm: Citation CJ 4
4. Long range: Citation Longitude
For all planes I use the relevant mods, which improve the quality and handling of these planes dramatically. The Longitude, especially, is quickly becoming my favorite plane.
I'm not going to link each and every mod separately, but here is the relevant sticky from the MSFS forums. Be sure to also check out the discussions in the relevant sub-forums.
https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/community-aircraft-mods-megathread/282130
I haven't had so much fun in a flight sim since the early days of Terminal Reality's Fly!
- 5
-
The author of the mod has released a new version: 1.40.
https://flightsim.to/file/3655/asobo-cessna-citation-longitude-flight-dynamics-modifications-project-version-1-0
https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/cessna-citation-longitude-flight-dynamics-modification-project/325768/181
- 1
-
This guy is doing a " 7 cotinents tour" in the Longitude.
https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/seven-continents-of-flight-in-the-citation-longitude/331950
-
You can read into my answer whatever you wish. The simple fact of the matter is that if you want to be heard, post a bug report or participate in the relevant discussion on the official forums.
-
10 hours ago, ADamiani said:I'm opening this thread because I don't want to hijack the other one already opened with a different purpose.
Two open questions:
1) Do you agree that each update is reducing the visual quality of MSFS?
Quick note: this is not whining: this is an opinion based on facts.
1) No, I don't agree.
2) Your opinion might be "based on facts". but you do realize that there are about 678 threads talking about how the sim "gets worse after every upgrade".
Raise the issue at zendesk and report it on the msfs forums.
-
6 hours ago, andyjohnston.net said:the ridiculous amount of time it takes to load!
One simmer's ridiculous, is another one's short loading time. Patch after patch loading times have improved for me.
-
If I were a certain company I'd be starting to loose sleep...
- 3
Working Title CJ4 v0.8.0 - OPEN BETA - RNAV/LPV, VNAV, FADEC
in Microsoft Flight Simulator (2020)
Posted
So, is the consensus that using the default flight planner in MSFS causes CTDs`?