Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Donations

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About SB9DV

  • Rank
  • Birthday 07/04/1956

Contact Methods

  • MSN
  • Website URL
  • ICQ
  • Skype

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    West Sussex UK

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
  • Virtual Airlines
  1. Ok, SOLVED! I made sure any existing install was removed and cleaned up with CCleaner. Then attempted to reinstall, but this time when prompted to select the Simulator from the list, I chose FSX instead of FSX Steam Edition (I use the Steam Edition variant) and the install went fine. The missing menu option was this time available and working. It took some time to set up the unit (the manual is very comprehensive about a lot of things - except it does not really tell you what to do and how to do it!). But after a day of effort, the device is installed and working. Now I just need to learn how to use it! Wonder if it can read PLN files? cheers, Lee
  2. Hello, I purchased the Reality XP GNS530 product yesterday with the intention to learn to use it on the Alabeo Cessna 310R. I want to join in the London to Australia rally and after years of flying VOR/NDB navigation in light aircraft and years of flying the big tin using FMC/Radio navigation, I wanted to learn this method for the rally and for VFR flying generally. I checked that the Alabeo Cessna does support the inclusion of the GNS530 and there is an EXE file that removes the original Alabeo gauge and inserts the RXP one. I use FSX-SE on a Windows 10 64-bit system with FS running at 2560 x 1440 resolution. The install of the GNS530 stalled for several minutes and so I stopped the install using Task Manager. I then launched the installer again and all seemed to go well. I then ran the EXE file to "swap" the gauges. Opening the Cessna 310 in FSX, I got a dead unit! The new gauge was there but absolutely dead. No ON/OFF switch or anything that the mouse would react to! So I ran the EXE file that swaps them back again and all is well. However, I do not know what to do about this. Is the gauge installed? I check ADD/REMOVE Programs and cannot see a RXP installation. The original Alabeo gauge is now back ok. Any ideas? My order details - Order Number 1463829 - John James - yesterday 07-September-2019 at 12:31:37pm Thank you, regards, Lee
  3. Hi, Cannot really find the answer to this ..... I want to take part in the London to Australia Rally over at Bluegrass Airlines. I have purchased the Alabeo Cessna 310R II aircraft for the event and now for timing purposes, I want to place Tom Goodrick's FTimer gauge onto the main panel of the Cessna 310 VC. I have tried many ways to insert the gauge line into the panel.cfg but it just will not display! If I place it under WINDOW.00, it does not show. If I place it under the Vcockpit01 - [Vcockpit01] Background_color=0,0,0 size_mm=512,512 visible=0 pixel_size=512,512 texture=$Panel_1 gauge00=GPS530_3D_CC310R!GPS_530_3D, 0, 0, 512, 372 gauge01=C310RIIALA!ToggleCAR530, 64,0, 256, 32 gauge02=Digital!FTime, 72, 380 It does not show. If, however, I change the gauge number thus - gauge59=Digital!FTime, 72, 380 It shows as two gauge parts, but they are very small and are right on top of the radio stack! I use FSX-SE running Windows 10 64-bit at a screen resolution of 2560 x 1440. Can anyone suggest a way for me to do this? I keep reading how it is not possible to add a gauge to a VC panel, but I am hoping to do this. I used to do it back in my FS2004 days. The only other possibility is to use a Time to Decimal calculator for the timings. Thanks for any help you can provide, Regards, Lee
  4. Hi, Thanks for your kind replies. To be honest, I'm not sure about the "eyepoint" I don't use any camera addons. Essentially, because I'm in VC mode, I need to be able to see the cockpit in wide screen so to speak - so when the aircraft loads, I go to the FMS and select COLD & DARK - then I set the cockpit view to its widest view by zooming out (using just the "+" key on the top row) and then I re-arrange the cockpit by moving it across to the left, so I can see the ALT window and the CMD buttons (I hold down the SHIFT and the CTRL keys and then use BACKSPACE or ENTER to "move" the cockpit to the left (in the Captains seat). I then use the A key to cycle through the various panel areas that I'll need to use (IRS NAV buttons, top panel, the OVERHEAD panel, the RADIo/PEDESTAL panel, etc,) which I then use the "+" or "-" keys to re-size so I can see them clearly. From this point on, I can then use the "A" key to get to whatever panel I need to use or watch during my pre-flight and startup. Add to this, I usually then resize the outside views as well - for good outside views. As to the "eyepoint" I do not know exactly where that point is, so I don't know if I'm behind or in front of it. I have tried using the SPACEBAR to reset the view. But I then loose the bottom of the flight deck. And this does not re-establish the click spots. So I need a little more help to identify this point so I can try your fix. cheers, Lee
  5. Hi, I recently moved up from FS2004 to FSX-SE on a brand new Flying Computer from Chill blast, a company specialising in high level PCs here in the UK. Running Windows 10, 64-bit, latest update on an i7-7700k 4.2GHz CPU with 16GB RAM, a GeForce 1080ti 11GB graphics card. OS is on a 500GB SSD with FSX-SE on a separate 2TB 7200 HDD. I have owned the FS2004 versions of the 737NG (all variants) and the 747-400/400F and am a long time customer. The 737NGX is installed correctly, licenced and the Operations Centre functions fine and is up to date. The 737NGX is a wonderful aircraft and it has taken me some time to move up from flying on a 2-D panel to flying in VC but now I have mastered it. Problem is that I seem to intermittently "lose" all my click-spots in the VC from time to time! I have researched this a little and it seems I'm not the only one experiencing this anomaly. Sometimes it's all fine, other times I just cannot click anything in VC at all. Sometimes it sorts itself out and comes back. Mostly when it happens, it does not come back. I tried changing the views and the zoom levels. Mostly it does not work. Switching views worked one time, but today, I was flying from Gold Coast in Australia to Coolangatta in Cairns and I had to use the 2-D panel to descend and complete the landing. Then, parking on the stand, guess what? I could not shutdown the engines! The 2-D panel did not help because there is no throttle quad in the 2-D panel!! I tried using CTRL+SHIFT+F1 and I managed to shut down No.1 engine - but I could not shut down No.2! For 10 minutes I tried everything I could think of to shut it down. Using the "E" key to switch from No.1 to No.2 did not work. Neither did CTRL+E, CTRL+SHIFT+E or anything else. Cycling the views did not work and I could not pull the shutoff lever at all. My last effort was to shutoff the fuel pumps. No luck there either. In the end I had to exit the sim. This only seems to be an issue with the 737NGX. I have the 777-200LR and the 747 QOTS II and so far this has not happened with them. Most people seem to reload the sim and sort out the problem. Not really something I want to do during an ACARs monitored flight! So before I go to PMDG Support, i wanted to ask here if anyone had any ideas about how to solve this? Thank you for your time. Merry Christmas to you all! Regards, Lee James West Sussex UK
  6. Hi, I installed a new Airbus model into FS9 - as I have done so many times now - and all works fine. Except - that when I turn on the APU and then start the engines, I get this ...... And this .... The model is fine and the only change I have made is to "alias" the Eurowings Pro panel to the model and also a different Sound set. Note that I have done this many times and I have a number of Project Airbus models in different liveries, all safely installed and working and using the Eurowings Pro panel and various sound sets. I suspected the Aircraft.cfg file and found the Wake and Spray options enabled under the EFFECTS section. Disabling these made no difference - and they are also enabled in other PA models already installed! To try to troubleshoot this problem, I loaded a similar model A320 into the same parking position, at the same airport and gate and the same time and did a start up with no issues. I then loaded the problem aircraft and did the same thing - resulting in the spray coming out from the wheel area as shown. I did, however, successfully fly the jet from SCEL to SBGR with no issue - but with this spray continuing to come out until I shut down the engines. I cannot access the MDL file without and editor and I would not know how to spot any problems, Anyone have any ideas? Cheers, Lee
  7. Hi, I have a custom built computer system for MSFS (customised by the late great Mike Greenblatt of FS-GS) running FS9.1 (FS2004) on a Windows XP Pro SP3 based OS. I do hope to move to FSX-SE in the near future but not just yet. And I want to keep this system to fly until I have the new rig set up as I want it. My NVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 2GB Video card seems to be on the way out now. Textures draws are slow now and the screen occasionally "flashes" (only happens in FS, not in normal Windows environment use) and so I want to replace the card. Naturally, this video card is no longer available. Searching the Internet for used or nearly new cards, reveals many available but only the 512MB variety and usually only for the Apple Mac! I really want to keep as much of my settings as possible while installing another card, so I am asking for recommendations as to what card to buy to replace this one. My system is an Intel Pentium Dual Core E5400 CPU running at 2.73Ghz with 2GB of dual channel RAM. The motherboard is an ASUS P5KPL-SE which supports PCI-E. I have Flight Environment Pro and GE Pro installed as well as the complete Ultimate Terrain series (Alaska, USA, Canada and Europe). I use ActiveSky Evolution (the last version available for FS9) for my weather. I'm not certain exactly how the video card is set up and I'm concious of possible losing all my settings when I get a new card so I really want to minimise this - if I can. I'm also wondering if there is a faster CPU available out there that would fit my motherboard and just give FS2004 as little "boost" as it were. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you Lee James West Sussex UK
  8. Hi, Not sure if anyone checks this forum or not anymore but here goes with a question.... I still use Squawkbox with FS9 (FS2004) online with VATSIM, although I will be moving to FSX-SE later in 2016 - and hopefully P3D if the licencing options change to allow me to use it. There are still aircraft (and liveries) that are not available in the Squawkbox VIP model set. For example, the new 787 and the 747-8 cannot be set up under the option to ADD AIRCRAFT in SB because these jets came along after work stopped on developing SB further. I would like to try and see if I could add a 787 and a livery for it such that when I add the aircraft into SB and connect online, the aircraft can be "seen" in MultiPlayer mode by others connected online with me at the time. I appreciate that perhaps any resulting new model that gets done will need to be available for download by others so they can add it to their model set and thereby "see" my new aircraft. I was wondering if there was a tutorial or a method for creating this? Or even perhaps a way to use and existing model (say the current 777) and then adapt it so that it appears as a new model, that looks like a twin jet but is labelled as a 787 - again, so it can be seen. And how do I set a livery for it? There seems to be no documentation around to help me with this idea - so can anyone here point me to some help? I appreciate any comments you chaps can make that might help me to see if this is a viable idea. Thank you, Kind regards, Lee
  9. Hi, Interesting to read this discussion, some of which I understand and some I don't! :smile: I am just now researching a new computer build based around the Intel i7-4790k CPU on a Windows 7 64-bit based system. The problem is the choice of monitor. I currently FS9 on a PC with Win XP Pro SP3 on a dual core cpu and my monitor is an IIyama 19" with FS9 running at a 4:3 screen ratio in 1280x1024x16 resolution. Graphics card is a NVidia GeForce 8800GTS. The new system will also have an NVidia card, possibly the Asus NVIDIA GTX 970 STRIX 4GB Graphics Card My intentionis to carry on with the FS9 system as it is while the new system is built and I work on learning a new way to fly. I'm going up to FSX Steam and also looking at XPlane. That being the case, I'm now going to have to learn to fly FS in a different way after many years of simming. I'm a 2D cockpit man and now I'm going to have to learn to fly using the predominently VC-type flight decks found in FSX. At the age of 59, my eyesight is not what it used to be and I'm not looking forward to trying to read the instruments while having to zoom in and out here and there to do so. So, my question as a first time moving into this new arena, is what type of monitor and what type of connection should I be looking at? The late Mike Greenblatt of FSGS, a wonderful chap from whom I learnt a lot, always said to go for an odd size monitor (27, 29, 31 inch etc.) and make sure you run FS at the same resolution as your Windows desktop. So is it worth going up to a large screen (34 to 40 inches - TV or LED type perhaps)? What effect will that have? I guess it could result in blocky pixels. I have looked at 27 inch monitors which seem to be in the good price range here in the UK but might be too small. There is also the 29 inch ultra-wide which most likely would not really help. And what connection? HDMI? DVI? I would value comments by someone here, taking into account what has been said, that might help me make the right choice. Thank you, Regards, Lee
  10. My God! What a shock! Like othes here, I am deeply saddened by the loss of the amazing man. He was a true specialist. I remember the time I began to have issues - most notably the dreaded Out-Of-Memory Errors - with my FS9 installation. Many of our members over at British Airways Virtual and others outside of the Organisation mentioned Mike and his services. On the first email exchange, I was sceptical. However, ultimately I allowed him completely free reign when we began the task of "unifying" my PC to get the best of FS9. Mike knew things about FS and Windows that even the experts at Microsoft didn't! Wow, what a difference he made! People said he was capable of miraculous things with Flight Simulator - well, he certainly was! The change was truely dramatic. And I was going to consult him about moving on to FSX one day soon ..... I'm kind of stunned really. I never knew about his illness and I suspect many others didn't know either. Such an aggressive and dreafful disease that took him from us. I never met him although I had planned to on one of our trips Stateside. But it never happened. I believe Mike lived in Long Beach but originally came from New Jersey. *********************** British Airways Virtual will dedicate OverNighter 11, our October overnight long haul event, our last one for 2012, to Mike's memory. A tragic loss! Our sincere condolences to his wife and family - our thoughts are with them. "Cleared to Flight Level Infinity and Beyond - Mike, take your place among the heavens my friend"
  11. Carl,>..... I would appreciate a copy, and also, perhaps that will take care of any filter issues, I have tried emailing you repeatedly overthe past year, and each time I get the email bounced back :(. Looking forward to your communication. Thanks!<
  12. Hello Carl,>>BTW if anyone has a copy of RW BA checklists and wouldn't mindsharing, I'd LOVE to find one in my inbox!!!!<
  13. Hello Q,>>On the contrary. It never hurts anyone to recheck their>"facts". Both F/O's and Training Captains have been known to>be wrong from time to time. Ask Mr Randazzo :(<>Re the one pack/no pack debate for start. This is dependent onthe modification status of an aircraft. It was found on aircraft with older pneumatic system software (or hardware...can't remember), that the shock to the pneumatic system was too great going from "no packs" duct pressure to "main engine start" duct pressure. For a while, it was necessary for crews to select at least one pack on during start. Some crews may still use one pack out of habit (or can't find information in their books stating for sure which aircraft have been modified). I don't recall seeing any amendments in our maintenance manuals, so we usually do the same thing. Havingone pack is not going to hurt the engine, whereas no packmight.<>If I get the opportunity, I'll ask a BA crew this week aboutprocedures... Pilots sometimes have different views/recollections on certain matters however... So I'll try to catch them when there are at least 3 in the cockpit ;)<>Incidentally, I was originally under the impression that APU~Pack ops was dependent on weight AND temperature.... but I'm quite willing to accept that _I_ am wrong on this issue.<
  14. Hi there,I find it a real pity that someone who states that he has no connection with the real British Airways, is unable to accept the possibility that his information might be incorrect.I was certainly able to accept that possibility - which is why I re-checked the information and discovered that it was in fact correct.Your suggestion about me asking my friend to check in with your Training Captain for some additional SOP training is unfortunate and rather offensive - and confirms my initial suspicion that your claims about having the correct information here might in fact be highly questionable. However, i don't intend to degrade the thread further by pursuing that line of enquiry.Its a pity that a really useful thread here has been threatened somewhat by your unprofessionalism in your remarks about my friends who are serving line pilots on the 744 with BA and have been for some time. I was certainly prepared to listen to the possibility that you might be correct. Now, unfortunately I cannot do that.I am always happy to be corrected if my information is wrong - which I'm satisfied that it isn't in this case - but you seem rather upset and offensive in your tone when your opinion is questioned here.A real pity. I had hoped that the discussion could have gone forward.In this case, I am satisfied with regard to the procedures and the information I have been given. And I'll take no further part in this discussion as I have answered your threatening tone and wish to go on to better things.My best regards,Lee
  15. Good evening,Sorry, you still don't give your name so I can't greet you properly...>>Sorry for the delay. The information I posted above was directly from the latest version of the BA flying manual, so is fairly correct. However in order to authenticate it I have just spoken to acurrent senior captain on the jumbo with BA.<
  • Create New...