Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Donations

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by janda

  1. >I have a 50 series serial number. I do not have any phantom>key issues. Just the sticky yoke when climbing and slightly>off center calibration. The calibration is simular to the way>the plane would resond if you where using the number pad to>turn and clicked the 6 key once. It just keeps turn, banking.> I am a private pilot so I am familar with the movement of the>DG.as you said xxx50xxx series :( ... yokes starts from xxx51xxx are free from that behaviours..brds
  2. >I have been using my Saitek yoke for a month or so, tweaking>to get it working like I want. I have resisted to post>becuase there has been enough issues regarding this product>and I was still getting use to it. I have a CH yoke and it>performs well except for some stickiness, so I bought a>Saitek.>>Well I have some stickiness. It is when pulling and releasing>slowly it sometimes sticks prior to the center. It centers>perfectly for roll. Any ideas? Lubrication suggestions? I>have taken it apart but can not determine where it is>sticking.>>I also have noticed a slight out of trim condition flying the>172, it always turns to the left a little. I have calibrated>it many times. Looking at the deazones in the control panel>it appears that the yoke is just slightly off center. I>havenot increased the dead zone here but will try. Any>ideas.>>I do not have any randoms key presses or any other issues.Please give me your serial number of your yoke.. you can find it of the bottom side. It can say a lot... brds
  3. >>as we can read on "polypoke" blog , they are ready to show>>first glimpse of new addon from Microsoft Acceleration , and>>dx10 (early compilaton I thing) is already here too.>>http://polypoke.spaces.live.com/>>>>So my question ... is there anybody to share some videos or>>photos from "Hangar B" ???>>>>brds>>>>Martin>>Martin,>>The DX10 update I was referring to is the run-time components>for the video card. The FSX DX10 update is not yet ready to>show publicly.>>Regards,>>OwenHi Owen..sorry to hear that .. at least I was hope .. ( you said dx10 update), so we have to wait a litlle longer..anyway I`m waiting for any media from hangar B ( Acceleration), hope to see lots on your blog :)brdsMartin >
  4. as we can read on "polypoke" blog , they are ready to show first glimpse of new addon from Microsoft Acceleration , and dx10 (early compilaton I thing) is already here too.http://polypoke.spaces.live.com/So my question ... is there anybody to share some videos or photos from "Hangar B" ???brdsMartin
  5. as in the title, any FSX upgrade?, new features? any plans?anything for new FSX?BRDS
  6. hmmm is there any chance to see it in final version?????? It`s really strange when it`s raining and no mark is visible on water ....brds
  7. that`s it as below :Let's see if I can recall from memory:Airbus A321Aircreation 582SL ultralightBeech BaronBeech KingAirBell 206Boeing 737-800Boeing 747-400Bombardier CRJ-700Cessna 172Cessna 208Dehavilland DHC2 BeaverDG-808SDouglas DC-3Extra 300Lear 45Maule M7Mooney BravoPiper J-3Robinson R22And in the deluxe version:Beech Baron w/Garmin G1000Cessna 172 w/Garmin G1000Grumman GooseMaule M7-235 on skisMooney Bravo 172 w/Garmin G1000this is from another site forum where Mike post it.brds
  8. check them out...http://www.flightxpress.de/artikel/070806/fsx/fsx.htmlbrds
  9. >Great find mate. Now it can't be long until we get some>hands-on time :)Thanks should going to Paul Lange (msfs member) and his blog... :) http://blogs.technet.com/p-12c_pilot/archi.../01/444359.aspxbtds
  10. just two... but ..http://www.elmundo.es/navegante/2006/07/24...1153756594.htmlbrds
  11. here you are...http://simuvuelo.org/pagina01.aspx?npag=93brds
  12. As Paul said,perfomance increase allready about 30% after first developers touch .... !!! :)read about it and more ... :)http://blogs.technet.com/p-12c_pilot/archi.../22/442904.aspx brds
  13. >Not disapointed at all. Mostly cause this isn't an official>Microsoft video. So I'm treating it as such. Meaning not>official and homemade and no representation of what the final>product might hold. ;) >>Either way, each that passes we get a day closer to see the>final product(barring any delays). :) Bob... trust me THIS IS OFFICIAL MS VIDEO from MS Conference in Redmond... sorry , but after OVER 3 YEARS of work on FSX , I suspect more "fresh" inovations... at hot:- better 737 cockpit- default (who fly on it?? )- airport traffic - we have it already in fs9- touchdown -the same like fs9 - really nothing new to say o yeahhhh 3 YEARS OF GOOD WORK!!so for now ... let `see final productbrds
  14. >Could see how you might say that. There are 2 main reasons>why I say no.>>1st Autogen looks FS9(1a. ground textures too). 2nd, stunt>planes in multiplayer almost looked 'layered' onto the video.>>Sure Frankfort's airport had service vehicles moving about>(FSX feature), but its not like there aren't addons of>Frankfort out there for FS9.>I understand that you are disapointed .... I`m toobrds
  15. >Funny & "cute". But didn't see anything that screamed "I'm>FSX!!!"(not counting ending title, which you could slap on>anything).>>So quit teasing us with the 'fake' FSX videos! :( UNFORTUNATLY this IS fsx....brds>>
  16. Just look at that.... http://www.projectmagenta.com/video/SharedSkies.wmv38mb:(brds
  17. >LAdamson..>>Just dont forget your not the only one who "knows what youre>talking about". I am a pilot too, and if you think this flight>model is sufficient, and graphics should come before>this....well, I am not so sure you know what youre talking>about then..its room for BIG improvement no doubt about it.Well said...one explenation.. I started this topic not because I hate Ms and developers etc... just because FS series (since 2.0) are my HUGE PASSION and bring computer aviation to the very high level of realism.... my opinion about not sufficient flight modeling is going rather for understand (by developer ) that along with improwment realism in graphics and others things, Ms team should know that the graetest deal in FLIGHT SIMULATOR is FLIGHT MODELING AND BEHAVIOUR OF AIRCRAFTS IN THE AIR , ON THE LAND ,WATER and with various weather conditions,and that system should be completly reworked to bring new platform for third party developers (I don`t mean default aircraft).As we know AGAIN in the next version we will see only small changes (if any,because as Mike said, they are quite happy with current modeling ) that`s not way to GET IT AS REAL AS... again Fs will be looking and sound better , but it`s not huge step to bring it on Higher level of realism ... (for me of course) ... I know that everyone coudn`t be happy yes I know.. but FROM FLIGHT SIMULATOR not EARTH SIMULATOR I expect more realism during flight from behaviour of aircraft (yes I know Real air productions so far the best , but why they have to using tricks and other things to force a spin for instance ???(developer words) Mike said that there is One person responsible for flight modeling in MS team...ONE MAN in whole group of 40 people (or more) so it`s clear that is not MAJORITY problem for MS fs... the problem is $$$, so for new users it should be only looking better for ACHH and wowww!!! (again I speaking for myself).at the end I still love FS and will forever , it pains me only that my Best Simulator platform didn`t going for it`s assumption and core ideas... :(brds btw, sorry for my english ...I do it my best :)
  18. >I actually agree with what janda is trying to say here. Not>the way he said it though. Having spent years and years>developing, I am a little surprised that this core component>remains just about the same....lots of things in the flight>model that needs work..one thing that bothers me, is when a>plane makes contact with the ground, the transition is>everything but smooth and realistic..>Thank`s man , I think that is a "few" more people whith similar feelings, and it`s unbelivie how passive words are comming from others ... if you are agree, that is nothing to do with actual flight dynamics , and it needn`t be totaly reworked ok .. so IT WILL BE THE SAME ... IT`S NOTHING BETTER FOR OUR`S DEVELOPER MS... they will only change graphics and other things in the next version for new users...... it`s all know that FS with similar flight dynamics to X-PLANE would be never beat!!! ....FS have incredible graphics , we know about it , but there is more to do in other things ... I can`t understand WHY MS are in such defense to do nothing with that...what is the reason ??? too much complicated??? lack on stuff??? is there any resonable reason to DO NOTHING WITH CORE COMPONENT OF FLIGHT SIMULATOR??????brds
  19. >Also, FSX will continue the 3rd party developement trend. In>case you weren't aware, there are add ons you can get that>simulate specific aircraft almost exactly. Companies that come>to mind are Dreamfleet, Caranedo, PMDG, Level-D and a whole>slew of others. You can't expect each plane that comes with>FSX to be modelled to the degree of any of these add-on>developers. >>Cheers,>(SONIC) Boone>>Currently saving pennies for a new pooter for FSX (don't tell>the misses!)...my god...I`m not talking about default planes!!!! I`m mean new system of modeling on which developers can make theirs planes .This is the point!!!! don`t you understand??? brds
  20. >Janda, you're out of line.>>The developers do their best to provide a product with the>greatest amount of appeal to the widest range possible. To>that end, they try to satisfy as many people as they can. But>they can't do everything for everyone.>>Flight dynamics are important, but so are many of the other>things in the effort to create a trulty immersive>environment.>>Are you a pilot? Many of the people who visit flightsim>forums who are real pilots state that they are actually quite>pleased with the flight dynamics (well, they don't always say>that about the helicopters.)>>I've been using flight sim since back in the days of FS-5.1,>I've got my own small flightsim site at>http://flightsim.andyjohnston.net where I've put together>literally hundreds of freeware add ons, and I've watched the>product grow a great deal from those days. I think they are>absolutely on the right track, I only wish they were able to>squeeze even more great features into each release (I'm sure>they wish for that to, and would do it if they had the>resources.)>>I don't want to sound like I'm being a jerk here, but to speak>in that tone of voice to *anyone,* let alone the developers>who come here in their free time...yes, actually I`m a glider pilot, and during ppl... so I know what I`m talking about.... anyway, nobody will tell me that fs9 flight dynamics is so good that it shouldn`t be any major work on it.That`s all.brds
  21. >You should be getting a ton more info in the next few weeks,>including at Oshkosh.:) ok thanksbrds
  22. >I think if you check the forum posts you'll see that we do>make incremental changes to the physics/flight systems each>version. However, the fundamental system we have now>satisifies the needs of the very vast majority of users so>there's little benefit from overhauling it. Other flight sims>on the market use different systems so I'd encourage you to>try them (if you haven't already) to see if they offer what>you're looking for.is it some kind of joke???? - the fundamental system we have now>satisifies the needs of the very vast majority of users so>there's little benefit from overhauling it.ooops sorry , because it`s something wrong with that... you guys are working on FLIGHT SIMULATOR or what? and if on , so what is the most important on this kind of software??? making each version better and better physics/flight modeling or going for eye candy? YOU ARE thinking that FS9 flight model is great enough for very vast majority???? sorry but it`s not true, I can guarantee that MOST users are agree with me... Mike , I really appreciate what are you making in graphics aspects , it`s also very important , but at the same time you should make changes (major) in flight modeling/weather behaviour etc.... brds
  23. as we know after Ifc Denver that almost nothing had done with flight modeling and psychics over fs9 ... x(A question was directed to the team about flight models and whether they
  24. what about fsx compability? any future patch will be relasing?brds
  • Create New...