Jump to content

fghdgdfdfgfgf

Frozen-Inactivity
  • Content Count

    925
  • Donations

    $25.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by fghdgdfdfgfgf


  1. 18 hours ago, westman said:

    If you for some reason want to uppgrade to 8cores from a 6core cpu 8700k to 9900K.
    you have a good Z370 Mobo with external usb 3.1 gen2 controller and not use wifi.
    If you read the specs the only big difference is onboard Wifi and usb 3.1 gen2

    I read in some treads here at Avsim that Z390 should OC better then the Z370 true?
    or is it rumors that popped up on the net without any source.

    Have start Overclocking a 9900k on my Z370 Apex MoBo .

    Get the CPU stable with  5.4ghz HT-on and 5.5ghz   HT-off , cooling customloop 360 rad and D5 pump.
    I write in a tread here at avsim that i pass the 9900k if i not find a really GOOD cpu, get lucky to find one.

    The ASUS Z370 APEX Overclock as the Top of the line Z390 boards can even be sligtly better .

     

    Thanks for the report!

    Rob A. reports at another forum that he's running 5.5 (assume he's still on the z390 Fomrula), but seems to require a 2 stage boot up process that is not unlike the start up sequence for a Saturn V rocket.

    18 hours ago, westman said:

    Funky Nasty if you find a good  9700k-9900k CPU , its the only you need.

    here is a CB15 test run, no tweaks mems 4133 c17  no tweaking a std asus mem profile.

    But that's just it ....what are the odds of me finding a "good" 9900 or 9700.

    Yes! Nice Cinebench score  ....and I like those voltages.  WTG, man.

     

    If given the chance, post some other performance screen shots.

    Thanks!


  2. On 3/3/2019 at 8:31 AM, SunDevil56 said:

    Good advice. I expect the winds can get unpredictable and pretty squirrelly on those approaches, especially if you are running a real world weather engine like AS4 etc...

    Wasn't it 28L where the Asiana 777 crashed just short of the runway threshold a few years back..??

     

    KPHX  can have some serious attitude during the summer months, no?  🙂  Place is brutal!


  3. 51 minutes ago, SunDevil56 said:

    Good advice. I expect the winds can get unpredictable and pretty squirrelly on those approaches, especially if you are running a real world weather engine like AS4 etc...

    Wasn't it 28L where the Asiana 777 crashed just short of the runway threshold a few years back..??

     

    Yeah it was ..28 right was closed.

    True: My wife, daughter and I were scheduled to check in at the Marriott, across the logon from the 28's,  just  hours before that happened ....It was our (my :-)) bi annual plane spotting date to the Marriott. Wife and daughter didn't care about plane spotting but entertained me as long as the weekend included Union Square in SF

     

    Edit: to be clear ...I wasn't referencing the Asiana incident but rather the crash bug that can happen on approaches over water with P3D.

    • Upvote 1

  4. 4 hours ago, Airline2Sim said:

    I think SFO for me, althogh I’ve never been there for real. 

    I grew up around SFO. .Mir has captured the airport down to the mood. Yeah, it's a moody airport.  Heck, I think Mir lives nearby SFO  ...I get the sense he as personal connection to the strip.

    Unsolicted ...but,  I was at the opening of the AA hangar as a young boy ....inside was a brand new AA 747 .....yeah, we got the tour. Fond memories.

     

    Edit: to the OP.

    If doing KSFO make sure you're closer to 100' than 50' when crossing the rocks at the foot of the 28's. 🙂


  5. 1 hour ago, Noel said:

    I think your level of appreciation for benchmarking fully exceeds my own and may well exceed your own 'passion for P3D',  but I don't think you appreciate P3D any more than I do my friend.  I've been at it for well over 20 years, built PC's plenty over the years, and know enough to know what matters in a sim that is nigh to impossible to even benchmark in any meaningful way that transcends specific scenarios.  In a double-blinded comparison I would bet $1,000 today, no make that $10,000 today, that there will be NO SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE to users who decided to throw out their 2666 to install 3200 in their DRAM modules.   Zero, zip.  Oh sure, there will be slightly faster memory benchmarks, but that WILL NOT TRANSLATE to any detectable difference by even you, double-blinded!  Your focus on benchmarking apps apparently is where your biggest passion lies, and when it starts to influence the buying decisions of people less obsessed w/ minuscule differences in total performance I thought I'd bring up another POV.  Others will decide what it means to them, but that's how I see it. 

    Fair enough.

    -Cheers

     

    OBTW ......but my focus is actually on the little things ....you know, like how the needle on a steam gauge moves like I'd expect it to move in real life. Or maybe something as trivial as filling out an FMC and having the feed back response feel like the real thing    ....I won't even mention the bigger stuff like panning around in the cockpit without stutter.

    • Like 1

  6. 12 hours ago, Noel said:

    I think he'll see exactly nothing in the way of any detectible difference whatsoever as it relates to flying in any flight simulator.  

    Oh what the heck ....maybe it's time to give a shout-out to the dudes and ladies behind the hardware I so much appreciate:

    Intel ....8086 is old school good

    EVGA ... the 6393 1080ti has performed beyond expectation ....would buy it again in a heart beat

    Asus ... a big shout-out to the designers and engineers behind the z370 Apex. can't help but feel that this board was designed and engineered by hardware enthusiast/gamers for hardware enthusiast/gamers ...again, old school stuff.

    ..and the monitor I use taint bad either. 🙂


  7. 11 hours ago, Noel said:

    I think he'll see exactly nothing in the way of any detectible difference whatsoever as it relates to flying in any flight simulator.  

    Well, I think my level of appreciation for P3D and the 3rd party apps I use is a little deeper than yours. 

    If your hardware can do what's in the two graphics below then I'll sit down and refrain from reaching to those that might share the passion I have for P3d.

    The two graphics taken just now ....surfs still strong, so you can still go out and see for yourself...From KLAX to KSFO; Active Sky (5 layer clouds); PMDG 747; FSDream Team KLAX; Flightbbeam KSFO; Orbx So-Cal and Nor-Cal .....let's see what you got Noel.

    oXv1O80.png

     

    Link below is the approach over the Dumbarton:

    approach

     

     

     


  8. I think you'll see a nice a little pop in performance going from 2666 to 3200 C14 ...especially if you fly something a PMDG or the other Airbus study level aircraft. I recommend it.

    To be sure, I'm not recommending you go out and buy 4000 MHz memory.  While you will notice a difference going from 3200 to 4133 you'll probably have to go through more hassle and/or expense than it's worth. And there's no guarantee you'll ever get 4000+ with your mobo/cpu combo anyway.

    B-DIE  is the fab for Samsung's latest memory chips. It's accepted by most as being superior to other industry offerings ...and is usually very overclockable. Google it.

     

    • Upvote 1

  9. 5 hours ago, TrentXWB said:

    @FunknNasty Thanks!...  Do you have any performance comparison between different RAM speed, I know it is a lot to ask but was wondering how much performance gain I will get? Also what is your GPU

    EDIT: maybe I am wrong but I don't see that you have C14 there, C17 instead, no?

    Lat spring I spent a few hours playing with mem settings at LAX-24L, noon, fair skys and the PMDG 747:

    2400 C10  27 FPS

    3200 C14  30 FPS

    4133 C17  33 FPS

    The above tested at 5.0 ghz (all cores), 4.5 cache,  no avx offset

     

    The guy in the below link breaks down the affects of mem speeds at a microscopic level ...imagine the difference if he measured 3200 vs 4133

    https://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?101819-DDR4-4400-vs-4133&highlight=4400+4133

     

    DjangO has a generated a B-die list for us  ....I'd take the 3200 C14

     

     

    And lastly ....My mems are w-a-y overclocked. The middle cpu-z graphic shows the memory sticks I'm using. I'm also showing the AIDA because a simple tweak made last night got me an extra 1/2 GB pe sec and another tick off the latency with no increase in voltage(s). Yeah, work in progress. 🙂

    bczLrH9.png

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1

  10. I had a cheap Asus  24" 1920x1200 IPS before getting my current IPS monitor. At night even the cheap slow as molasses 24"  looked  good in the cockpit of a PMDG liner ...but ghosting and sync issues were really noticeable during the day, hence the reason I went for a hi performance IPS.

    Would I get a cheap IPS again? no. I'd probably get a hi performance TN if on a no break budget. A slow IPS is really slow ....So yeah, you're going to have to pay at least $600 (US) for a quality 27 inch IPS ....worth every penny IMHO.


  11. 12 minutes ago, Bert Pieke said:

    There is no way to futureproof with a video card...  :unsure:

    A 1080 is just fine for now, and wait and see what happens in a year or two..

    ...Bert-  you have 11,000+ posts here at Avsim, perhaps the above quoted  post is one too many?  No?

    Away from puter right now but, I can show a recent p3d v4.4 flight that was using 9.5 GB of video ram -should be home in a few hours ....I’ll post the hwinfo graphic.

    Heck, even on sunny day I’m using at least 8.5.

     


  12. 37 minutes ago, bishups said:

    The ram was a screw up.

     

    Understatement: your new pc doesn't even meet the "recommended" minimums for P3d, if you should decide to down that path. Xplane? pretty darn memory intensive ...memory speed has to mean something.

    41 minutes ago, bishups said:

     I was so focused on the cpu and gpu that I didn't take time to compare and think about my ram situation,

     

    Yeah, that could be an issue when you put your stuff together and you find your new rig isn't meeting performance expectations ....don't forget what your feeding your cpu. Oh, and the GPU also relies on system ram.

    Not that your asking me for advice, but I'd ship that memory back now and exchange it for at least 2666 memory.

    • Like 1

  13. 1 hour ago, Djang0 said:
    What I'm looking for is memory to complement my i7-9700K and GTX1080Ti but I'm not planning to OC the memory initially. Only as the system gets dated would I want a good OC from the memory, I'm looking for modules with Samsung B-Die chips.
     
    As a rule of thumb which of the following 32GB 2x16 kits would you guys consider:
    3000 CAS16 £250 (non B-Die)
    3000 CAS15 £275 (non B-Die)
    3000 CAS14 £350
    3200 CAS16 £280 (non B-Die)
    3200 CAS15 £350
    3200 CAS14 £380

    I'd get the 3200 C14 ...especially since you plan an overclock.  In theory, the 3200 c14 should be binned a higher quality than the rest..

    I have the 2x8 3200 C14 B-die ..can run my kit to at least 4300, am running it now at 4133 C17.


  14. 6 hours ago, bobbyjack said:

    All I can say is that if you had a mac that ran the equivalent of w7 you'd be pretty much out of luck as far as upgrading.

    Let's get a grip. 

    What? You see the graphic I posted?  37 processes running ...and that's with P3D v4.4, ASN, and FSDream team all running. Like Mike said: "to each his own".  And ....oh, by the way ....It would take me 10 minutes to go to the store any buy another drive and another ten minutes to install Win10 on my machine in dual boot config. Heck, and tha'ts with the bios tuned with Win10, I have twin bios.

    Now back to Win7, I've been running this install since I built the rig back in Feb. 2018, and it's exactly the same today as was last year ....no updates of any kind ....boots the same now as it did a year ago. 

    With that said ... don't go running out to get Win7 if you're on a Z390. Microsoft has made darn sure the we can't use Win7 on a new end user desktop going forward. Oh, I've said it before going to say it again, bet my house that my Win7 install completely outperforms your Win10 in the flight sim world.  Yeah, get a grip.

    • Upvote 1

  15. On 2/12/2019 at 3:18 PM, SteveW said:

    . Win 7 is thin and stuck in the past, Win10 has some great stuff - too much to mention.

    Steve ... you know the difference between a pig and a hog, right????

    y4s91DQ.png

    ...pigs get fat and hogs go to slaughter.

    You know Nike, the great American shoe company, has just announced a new autonomous shoe.  Yeah, always on the lookout to "enhance" the user experience the $300 (US) running shoe will tighten the laces without user intervention and will also allow the runner to track other runners ...of course you have to download the app.

    In other related news .....Health officials in San Francisco have reported that AIDs infections are on the rise for the1st time since the late 80's early 90's. The infected demographic? Adults in the early 20's. What's interesting? The kids had never heard of aids or they thought it was long eradicated.

    Top of the morning to Ya, Steve. 🙂

    • Like 1

  16. 11 hours ago, shafs67 said:

    Sorry i forgot to mention i and running a water cooling at the moment. also watch this video and was surprised that there was not a big difference between them.

    In reference to the 9900 vs 8700 video you posted. Captured this morning. My 8700 at 1.34v. LLC5, so we get droop to 1.328. Notice the fans? Yeah, the two case fans are stock -the litttle ones- at idle. The fans on the 240mm aio rad are Noctunas .....all but silent. My summertime blend. 🙂 THe captured  HWinfo vitals start on approach into lax. The flight originated from sfo. ambient: 22c

    xwsTY1W.pngUkt66zu.png

×
×
  • Create New...