torium

OT: If you are from Sweden and understand Norwegian - you can learn some tricks by going to Youtube and searching for: Hos tannlegen

Go to Youtube and search for: Marathon man dentist scene

From Randazzo (PMDG) July 28, quote:

Here is a nuanced post from the FS-forum:

In which menu can I select LOD 400 or LOD 500, etc.?

Thank you so much for your great creative contribution !!! 👍

I recently received a quick feedback. contact@blackboxsimulation.com

Flight simming should be fun. Nausea and vomiting are not fun. 🤢

IPACS recently said, quote: "We are also planning to bring a more realistic weather into Aerofly at some point but this is obviously a big feature that requires more than a year of our full time work."

But isn't AFS2 built on today's technology? After all, FSX, P3D (underlying technology dates to 2006) and X-Plane are built on yesterday's technology - and have largely reached their potential. The future of the latter will only become more of the same. And that's ok for most people. So far, AFS2 therefore does not have as many competitors on today's technology. Based on rumors from beta testers - those who today criticize AFS2 will probably also criticize the upcoming "VFR simulator" MSFS2020. Anyway we now have many good flight simulators to choose from. Wishing you all a Happy New Year.

What's the point? What do you want to discuss? The slow development of Aerofly FS2? IPACS has repeatedly admitted that their development is slow. That they are a small vulnerable team doing as best they can. What is it then you want to achieve with this recurring grievance over slow development - when IPACS already know and admit the reality? How motivating is it for the few developers to be constantly reminded of this challenge? All flight simulators have their weaknesses and strengths. Rumors say that this will also apply to MSFS2020. I am currently tired of the FSX / P3D / X-plane. Therefore, currently Aerofly 2 is my preferred simulator. Maybe it's because I do not have this need to see cars running on the roads?

Yes, please. Sounds great.

Oh, that's sad. Hoped for Plug and Play.

You know Aerofly is on multiple platforms?

http://www.aerofly.com/features/aircraft/

I think this should be fine: "This Glass Disc Can Store 360 TB of Your Photos for 13.8 Billion Years" https://petapixel.com/2016/02/16/glass-disc-can-store-360-tb-photos-13-8-billion-years/

From IPACS, quote:

Yes. Remember I was very impressed with the weather system.

Personally I choose realism before emotion. Jun 20, 2019 by Sérgio Costa, helisimmer.com, quote: https://www.helisimmer.com/news/aerofly-fs2-r22-slightly-changed-flight-model

Great !! Waiting for the Steam version of Aerosoft LUKLA.

Why? Are models of bridge, buildings and trees copy protected? We don't need orthos.

Yes, fortunately.... Such a statement would have otherwise been the basis for thorough medical treatment.

???? Do you mean 120 fps without stutters and blurries?

IPACS does not attempt to create a product that will replace P3D or X-plane. They have tried to explain this repeatedly. For some years back the FSW-team (Dovetail) conducted an extensive survey - and concluded, quote: "We have learned that flight simulation appeals to an incredible amount of people, but a lot of them find it too hard to get started with. It is our aim to reclaim and attract those would-be simmers, but in order to do so, we need to present flight simulation in a way that doesn't initially overwhelm them." IPACS recently stated something similar, quote: "The one thing that we are trying to do differently compared to the other flight simulators out there is we don't want our users spending a ton of time messing with settings and making under the hood adjustments, we also want a simple to use interface with limited settings so that casual flyers can also just pick this up and start flying." Do you see the point?