acbent2

5 hours ago, albar965 said:

Altitude is shown in different places: Progress window, elevation profile and map. You can configure LNM to show the indicated or actual altitude.

See LNM options on page "Map Display Labels" -> "User Aircraft". There are three different altitude values for the user aircraft on the map.

Same in "Tools" -> "Elevation profile display options" for altitude labels. The aircraft is shown in the profile using indicated altitude, by the way. This is affected by the baro setting.

Also "Tools" -> "Aircraft progress display options" -> branch "Altitude".

Let me know where it is wrong if this doesn't help.

Alex

 

Awesome, Alex! Thanks. I set "indicated altitude" and it's back to normal. Awesome program!

First off, I'd like to express how grateful I am to have LittleNavMap. It is a fantastic program, especially with the addition of Mapbox overlays. I use LittleNavMap in conjunction with Simbrief. Since upgrading to the latest version of LittleNavMap, I'm seeing a significant difference in my altitude in FS as compared to what I see in LNM. I'm currently cruising at FL390 in sim and according to LNM, I am at FL370. This discrepancy occurred right after I upgraded LNM. Any suggestions or recommendations I can implement to rectify this?

Thanks!

Adam

Vey late to the party, but I just recently acquired the scenery. It's fantastic, except for the glideslope on RW29. Localizer is bang on but the glideslope lands you almost at the touchdown zone of the reciprocal runway. Anybody know if they issued a fix for this? I couldn't find anything in their forums. Thanks!

I didn't see anyone mention Regina (CYQR). No one has done that one, including SimAddons. That would complete my short hops across Canada in the CRJ. Thanks. Your sceneries look great, btw.

Does anyone know if it has been substantiated that ToolbarPushback actually causes a performance degradation? If so, has a reason for the loss been explained anywhere? Thanks. 

Hi.

 

I have been out of flight simulation for a few years now and have only recently come back to it - a bit. Two kids, marriage, a new job etc has not left me any real time to fly.

 

I'm considering purchasing Fly Tampa's CYUL, but have concerns about my hardware's ability to handle it. I have an Athlon FX60 dual core processor and 768MB NVidia card and, I think, 2 Gigs of system RAM. Very old technology, I know. I can run Fly Tampa's KBOS smoothly enough with my LDS 767. Would CYUL be a lot more demanding than, say, the KBOS scenery?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Adam

Wow! Very nice! I especially like the prop spinner shots in the third set.

That's actually some what of how my quadrant is behaving. It works perfect in the CH manager, perfect with FSX, but FS9 I don't get it. I will post tonight the specifics of the problem to see if some one has any insight.

Actually, I managed to get it back somewhat by playing with the controller sensitivities. I don't know how, but they seemed to go out of whack. Once I played with them a bit it was much better. I have to do some 'fine tuning' in FSUIPC now.Thanks for the response.Adam

Hi All,For some reason my throttle quadrant calibrates fine in windows and in the CH Control Manager but when I go into FS9 and load my plane - twin engine Navajo Panther - the throttle levers advance at different rates, the prop controls are also out of whack and only one mixture works. It was working fine before but suddenly screwed up.I have uninstalled and reinstalled both controllers and made sure all the assignments are correct. I'm also using Peter D's FSUIPC and some of the readings show different numbers in the 'reset' sections and this is with both levers advanced to full. Please see pics.Im at a loss and could really use some help.Thanks in advance.Adam